2025年——私募策略星光大赏

Core Viewpoint - The article reviews the performance of various private equity strategies in 2025, highlighting the dominance of quantitative long strategies and the challenges faced by subjective long strategies, while also discussing macro strategies and CTA performance. Group 1: Quantitative Long Strategies - Quantitative long strategies have emerged as the top-performing strategy in 2025, continuing their strong performance from previous years [4] - In July 2025, the number of quantitative strategies among billion-yuan private equity surpassed subjective strategies for the first time, indicating a growing investor interest [6] - The high market trading volume, averaging 1.73 trillion RMB per day, has facilitated the success of quantitative strategies by allowing them to capture small price discrepancies [9][11] - The frequent style switching in the market has favored quantitative strategies, which can adapt quickly to changing market conditions and capture opportunities across various sectors [13] Group 2: Subjective Long Strategies - Subjective long strategies have seen a resurgence in 2025 after a period of stagnation, but they have underperformed compared to quantitative strategies [15][17] - Despite achieving positive returns, many subjective strategies are facing significant redemption pressures as investors seek to recover from previous losses [21] - Successful subjective long funds tend to focus on aggressive positioning and sector concentration, particularly in technology growth sectors [19] Group 3: Macro Strategies - Macro strategies have maintained their relevance in 2025, benefiting from a favorable market environment and delivering satisfactory returns [23][26] - The performance of macro strategies was uneven, with a lack of clear macro themes in the first half of the year, followed by a clearer structural market in the second half [29][30] - The increased negative correlation between assets in the latter half of the year allowed macro strategies to effectively hedge risks [33] Group 4: CTA Strategies - CTA strategies achieved an overall positive return of 19% in 2025, but there was significant performance divergence among different CTA sub-strategies [35][37] - The commodity market exhibited a "structural market" characteristic, with substantial differences in returns across various commodities, benefiting certain CTA strategies [43] - Long-cycle CTA strategies performed better in a volatile market by filtering out noise, while short-cycle strategies struggled with frequent trading signals [48][50] Group 5: Neutral Strategies - Neutral strategies generated positive returns in 2025, but the accumulation of these returns was not smooth [53] - The performance of neutral strategies improved before August, supported by strong small-cap stocks, but faced challenges afterward due to increased volatility [57][59] - Overall, while neutral strategies provided acceptable returns, they lagged behind the more aggressive strategies that achieved over 20% returns [61]