JPM医疗年会Day1-2回顾：从中国管线到全球竞争格局

Core Insights - The JPM Healthcare Conference 2026 highlighted a significant shift in the narrative surrounding Chinese innovation assets, which are increasingly recognized as critical components for multinational pharmaceutical companies' long-term growth strategies [4][5][24] - The conference emphasized the importance of clinical advancement efficiency and global development pace for Chinese pharmaceutical companies, marking the entry of their innovation pipelines into the core narratives of multinational firms as just the beginning [24] Group 1: Chinese Companies' Innovations - Chinese companies are now being integrated into the core strategies of multinational pharmaceutical firms, moving beyond previous "single-point licensing" narratives to being key contributors in oncology, neuroscience, and metabolic diseases [5][9] - Notable collaborations include SystImmune's BL-B01D1, which has a potential total deal value of $800 million with Bristol-Myers Squibb, and the KarXT project, which is prioritized for development in the psychiatric pipeline [5][7] - The partnership between 3SBio and Pfizer on the PD-1 and VEGF bispecific antibody SSGJ-707 is highlighted as a significant transaction, indicating its strategic importance in the next-generation oncology immunotherapy landscape [7][9] Group 2: Multinational Companies' Strategies - Multinational companies are focusing on a 2030 pricing framework, with strategic decisions revolving around which assets will shape the next industry reshuffle [10][24] - Bristol-Myers Squibb plans to launch 10 new drugs by 2030, emphasizing a multi-pillar approach to mitigate risks associated with patent cliffs [10][12] - Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals are adopting a focused strategy on single disease areas, with Madrigal positioning itself as a leader in the MASH field and Vertex concentrating on cystic fibrosis and gene therapy [12][15] Group 3: Market Dynamics and Challenges - The second day of the conference shifted focus to practical execution challenges, including competition in metabolic diseases, patent expirations, and supply chain management [16][24] - Eli Lilly expressed uncertainty regarding the market performance of its oral GLP-1 candidate, while Novo Nordisk acknowledged significant competitive pressures and emphasized direct patient channel management [16][18] - Bayer updated its assessment of patent expirations for Xarelto and Eylea, indicating a gradual approach to managing revenue impacts while relying on new product launches for future growth [18][19] Group 4: Supply Chain and Manufacturing - The importance of local manufacturing capabilities was underscored, with Samsung Biologics discussing its U.S. production capacity to meet growing demand [21][24] - Companies like Teva and Sandoz are focusing on the strategic value of biosimilars in light of upcoming patent expirations, indicating a long-term structural adjustment rather than a short-term fix [19][21]