AI会让人变蠢吗？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of AI on human intelligence and the importance of maintaining independent deep thinking models in the face of AI advancements [7][10][28]. Group 1: AI and Human Intelligence - The debate in the media and communication circles is divided between those who favor traditional methods ("hand-made") and those who embrace AI [7]. - Economists argue that AI may lead to the production of standardized and mediocre individuals, as AI can replace what it teaches [7][9]. - The author emphasizes that the training process of thinking models in the human brain is crucial, and the rise of short video consumption has already altered these models [8][9]. Group 2: Importance of Independent Thinking - Establishing an independent deep thinking model is essential for individuals, especially in fields like media and public relations [11][12]. - The article suggests that the ability to think deeply and independently is a key differentiator among individuals [13]. - The author highlights that while AI can assist in learning, the practice ("habit") must still rely on individual effort [13][14]. Group 3: AI Usage in Core Fields - It is advised to minimize AI usage in one's main area of expertise to ensure the development of independent thinking [15][16]. - The article notes that excessive reliance on AI for writing and creativity can lead to a decline in cognitive abilities [17][19]. - The author argues that the process of physically creating and expressing thoughts is a vital cognitive training exercise that should not be undermined by AI [19]. Group 4: Cultural and Historical Context - The article stresses the importance of preserving the legacy of human civilization and warns against the dangers of fragmented information consumption [21][22]. - It discusses the potential negative effects of AI on societal values and the need for human oversight in the information dissemination process [26][27]. - The author concludes that the choice of whether AI makes humanity smarter or dumber lies in human hands, emphasizing the need for a human "editor" to guide AI's role [28].