AI狂欢是“赢家的诅咒”么？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of "Winner's Curse" in the context of the current AI infrastructure competition, highlighting the irrational exuberance in capital expenditures driven by fear of missing out (FOMO) rather than sound financial models [2][5][9]. Group 1: Winner's Curse in AI Infrastructure - The term "Winner's Curse" refers to the tendency of winning bidders in auctions to overpay due to optimistic valuations, which can lead to disappointing returns [2][3]. - In the AI infrastructure race, major tech companies are engaged in a capital bidding war, with reported capital expenditures reaching up to $400 billion by 2025 [5][7]. - The competition is characterized by a lack of rigorous cash flow models, with companies driven by the fear of falling behind rather than rational assessments of value [5][7]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Pricing - The rapid increase in hardware prices, such as DRAM and high-performance memory, reflects the "Winner's Curse" as suppliers capitalize on the competitive bidding environment [7]. - The article draws parallels to historical events, such as the California Gold Rush, where the true beneficiaries were not the miners but those supplying tools and resources [7]. - The disparity between rising asset prices and struggling operational cash flows indicates a potential misalignment in market valuations [7][8]. Group 3: Talent Acquisition and Valuation - The "Winner's Curse" extends to the talent market, where companies are overpaying for top AI talent, often leading to overestimation of their marginal value [8]. - The rapid pace of technological advancement can render significant investments in talent obsolete before the return on investment is realized [8]. - The article emphasizes the importance of having the ability to exit investments that no longer make sense, contrasting with the tendency to continue investing due to sunk cost fallacy [8][9].