某公司强制研发每周二三四晚加班，每月必须 30 小时，不达标给 C 加扣钱！这合理么？

Core Viewpoint - The company has explicitly included "overtime hours" in the KPI requirements, mandating 30 hours of overtime for R&D staff and 40 hours for project managers each month, with penalties for non-compliance [1][4]. Group 1 - The requirement to include overtime in KPIs is seen as unreasonable, as it directly ties "overtime hours" to performance ratings and salary deductions [4]. - The company has set a structure where R&D employees must work overtime on specific days, effectively commodifying their right to rest [4]. - The notification states that failing to meet overtime requirements results in a performance rating of C or below, which is perceived as a way to eliminate any escape routes for employees [4][6]. Group 2 - The company operates under the assumption that employees will compromise to keep their jobs, leading to a culture where excessive overtime is normalized [6]. - There are instances where similar overtime mandates have been successfully challenged by employees, indicating that pushback can lead to policy changes [6]. - The workplace dynamic is described as a competition of who can say "no" rather than who can endure more, highlighting the exploitative nature of such policies [9]. Group 3 - Employees are advised to document all communications regarding overtime requirements and performance evaluations as essential evidence for potential future disputes [10].