专家建议取消中高考，这利好普通人吗？

Core Viewpoint - The suggestion to abolish the high school and college entrance examinations (Zhongkao and Gaokao) is seen as inevitable due to declining birth rates and an oversupply of educational institutions, which may lead to a mismatch between student numbers and available university spots [4][5][16]. Group 1 - The declining birth rate has resulted in fewer children being born than the number of undergraduate admissions, indicating a potential future need to cancel entrance exams [5][6]. - The current examination system is criticized as a "pseudo-exam" that primarily tests rote memorization, which is deemed irrelevant to real-life skills and job requirements [10][11]. - There is a call for alternative assessment methods such as project defenses, practical ability tests, and comprehensive quality evaluations to identify innovative talents [13][14]. Group 2 - Comparisons with Japan and South Korea show that despite similar declining birth rates, these countries have not abolished their entrance exams, which remain competitive [16][17]. - The argument against abolishing entrance exams is that they provide a standardized measure of knowledge mastery, which is practical despite not assessing creativity [20][21]. - The suggestion to find innovative talent through alternative means is acknowledged, but the feasibility of such methods is questioned given the current educational landscape [23][24]. Group 3 - The pursuit of comprehensive development in education is seen as subjective, with concerns that unnecessary subjects waste resources and yield minimal results [28]. - Education should consider long-term impacts, as seemingly unimportant courses can plant seeds for future growth and resilience in students [29]. - The fairness of the current examination system is highlighted, as it allows equal opportunity for students from different backgrounds to compete on the same level [30][31]. Group 4 - The suggestion to abolish entrance exams is viewed as potentially beneficial in the long run, but it risks undermining the fairness of the current system in the short term [40][41]. - The proposal reflects a misunderstanding of the educational needs of diverse student populations, particularly in less developed regions [42]. - The criticism of the proposal includes concerns that it may favor elite students while neglecting the educational equity for those from ordinary families [44][45].