Seedance 2.0真正的考验，将来自“地表最强法务部”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rapid rise of Seedance 2.0 and the ensuing copyright concerns, particularly highlighted by the backlash from copyright holders like Stephen Chow's representatives, indicating a growing anxiety within the content industry regarding the unchecked growth of AI technologies [3][6][10]. Group 1: Seedance 2.0 and Its Features - Seedance 2.0 allows users to easily create videos featuring iconic characters from popular IPs, such as those from Stephen Chow's films, by simply inputting basic materials [4][11]. - The generated videos are noted for their high quality, fluid movements, and expressive features, effectively capturing the essence of the original characters [5][11]. - The platform's appeal lies in its "unrestricted" creative freedom, enabling users to generate content that heavily relies on well-known IPs [11][12]. Group 2: Copyright Issues and Industry Response - The surge in AI-generated content has led to significant copyright concerns, with Stephen Chow's management publicly questioning the legality of the widespread use of his characters [6][10]. - The article emphasizes that Seedance 2.0 lacks adequate copyright protection measures, allowing users to generate videos featuring characters from major franchises like Disney and Dragon Ball without authorization [17][18]. - The content generated by Seedance 2.0 poses a higher risk of copyright infringement compared to static images, as the videos can closely replicate the original characters' actions and expressions [26][28]. Group 3: Legal Precedents and Implications - Disney has been proactive in protecting its IP, having filed lawsuits against various AI companies for unauthorized use of its characters, highlighting a broader concern for the film industry regarding AI's impact on copyright [21][24]. - The legal strategies employed by Disney include seeking economic compensation and establishing industry standards for copyright protection in AI technologies [24][25]. - The article suggests that Seedance 2.0 may face similar legal challenges as other AI platforms, given its ability to generate content that closely resembles copyrighted material [26][30]. Group 4: Potential Paths Forward for ByteDance - The article outlines several potential strategies for ByteDance, including litigation and settlement, proactive licensing agreements, or implementing technical measures to avoid copyright infringement [47][49]. - A historical perspective is provided, noting that ByteDance has previously navigated copyright disputes, but the current landscape may present more complex challenges due to the nature of AI-generated content [40][42]. - The company is advised to consider proactive engagement with copyright holders rather than waiting for legal action, as the stakes in the current environment are significantly higher [60][61].