全网最没存在感的潮牌，靠韩剧同款也没能翻红

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent acquisition of a 29.06% stake in Puma by Anta, highlighting Puma's decline in market relevance and performance, particularly in China, and questioning the brand's future direction under new ownership [5][12][36]. Group 1: Puma's Market Position and Performance - Puma has struggled to maintain its relevance among younger consumers, transitioning from a popular brand to one that is recognized but not actively engaged with [3][8]. - The brand's market performance has been lackluster, with a reported global revenue decline of 4.3% to €5.974 billion and a net loss of €309 million for 2025 [12]. - In the Chinese market, Puma's revenue accounted for only 7% of global income, indicating weak performance compared to competitors [12]. Group 2: Anta's Acquisition Strategy - Anta's acquisition of Puma is seen as a strategic move to leverage its experience in brand management and market positioning, similar to its successful turnaround of Fila [36][37]. - The acquisition is expected to provide Puma with a new opportunity for growth, although Anta has stated it will respect Puma's management culture and allow for independent operations [37]. - Anta's previous successes in brand repositioning suggest potential for Puma to regain market traction, but the process may be gradual and complex [36][39]. Group 3: Historical Context and Brand Evolution - Puma's historical roots are tied to its founding by the Dassler brothers, which has shaped its competitive dynamics with Adidas [16][19]. - The brand's identity has shifted over the years, moving from a focus on sports to a more fashion-oriented approach, which has contributed to its current market challenges [28][33]. - Despite past successes with celebrity endorsements and product launches, such as the Creeper designed by Rihanna, Puma has struggled to create consistent hit products in recent years [31][32].