别被 OpenAI 骗了！挖走 Peter 不是保护开源，而是为了掌控下一代 AI 操作系统

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI's hiring of Peter Steinberger is perceived as a strategic move to gain control over technology and commercialize it, contrasting with its previous non-profit stance [1][2]. Group 1: OpenAI's Strategic Shift - OpenAI has transitioned from a non-profit organization to a commercial entity under Sam Altman's leadership, introducing advertising in GPTs, which contradicts its earlier commitment to serve humanity rather than shareholders [1]. - The hiring of Peter Steinberger is seen as an effort to dominate the technology landscape, with the intention of transforming his architecture into a core asset for OpenAI [1][2]. Group 2: Implications for the SaaS Industry - If Steinberger's architecture becomes a "universal operating system," it could disrupt the existing SaaS industry, positioning OpenAI as a key player in controlling traffic and rules [2]. - Companies with platform ambitions are unlikely to support alternative solutions out of goodwill; instead, they will absorb key talent to understand and ultimately control the technology [2]. Group 3: Concerns Over Open Source - The argument that open source can ensure independence is countered by the view that it commodifies the foundational layer, failing to capture value from higher-level components like computing power and proprietary models [4]. - Even if the architecture is open-sourced, control will still reside with those managing the runtime environment, highlighting the importance of hiring core personnel to ensure compatibility with their ecosystem [4].