差不多

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of personal engagement in thinking and writing, particularly in the context of AI's role in creative processes. It argues that while AI can assist in generating content, it cannot replace the essential human experience of struggle and reflection that leads to genuine understanding and growth [11][56]. Group 1 - AI writing can produce clear and structured drafts, but human intervention often involves simplifying and refining the content to better reflect personal thought [6][7]. - The act of writing is portrayed as a process that forces clarity in thought, transforming chaotic ideas into coherent expressions [18][20]. - Engaging with AI can create a false sense of understanding, where individuals may feel they comprehend concepts without undergoing the necessary cognitive struggle [24][27]. Group 2 - The distinction between "Writes" and "Write-Nots" highlights the difference between those who actively engage in writing as a form of thinking versus those who rely on external sources [15][16]. - The article discusses the significance of taste and aesthetic judgment in the AI era, where individuals must remain critical of AI outputs to foster personal growth and improvement [34][38]. - Continuous engagement in creative processes is necessary to maintain and develop one's taste, as neglecting this can lead to a decline in critical judgment [43][44]. Group 3 - The article suggests that deep conversations with AI can provide valuable insights, but they lack the emotional and experiential depth that human interactions offer [45][48]. - It warns against the ease of substituting personal thought with AI-generated content, which can lead to a gradual decline in critical thinking skills [53][56]. - The call to "be human again" emphasizes the need for individuals to embrace the messy, imperfect aspects of thought and creativity that AI cannot replicate [57][58].