Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Jayud Global Logistics Ltd. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on January 20, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Jayud securities between April 21, 2023, and April 30, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court by January 20, 2026, to represent other class members in the litigation [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the class period, Jayud made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information, including involvement in a fraudulent stock promotion scheme and insider trading activities [5]. - Specific allegations include the use of social media misinformation and offshore accounts to manipulate stock prices, leading to misleading public statements about the company's business and prospects [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased SLM Corporation securities between July 25, 2025, and August 14, 2025, of the February 17, 2026, deadline to become lead plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought SLM securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by February 17, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiffs [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 and has been ranked highly for its performance in securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that SLM Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding its financial stability, particularly concerning early-stage delinquencies and the effectiveness of its loss mitigation programs [5]. - It is claimed that these misrepresentations led to a materially false impression of SLM's business operations and prospects, resulting in investor damages when the truth was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased common stock of Primo Water Corporation and Primo Brands Corporation during specified class periods about a lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Primo Brands securities between November 11, 2024, and November 6, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 12, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit claims that defendants misrepresented key facts about the merger between Primo Water and BlueTriton Brands, leading to investor damages when the true details were revealed [5]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, highlighting the firm's expertise and reputation in the field [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Perrigo Company plc securities between February 27, 2023, and November 4, 2025, of the January 16, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Perrigo securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by January 16, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [2] - The lawsuit alleges that Perrigo made materially false and misleading statements regarding its infant formula business, including issues related to underinvestment, necessary capital expenditures, and manufacturing deficiencies [4] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Klarna Group plc securities related to its September 2025 IPO, alleging that the Registration Statement contained false and misleading statements regarding the company's risk profile and loss reserves [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Klarna materially understated the risk of increased loss reserves shortly after the IPO, which was either known or should have been known to the defendants [5]. - It is alleged that the public statements made by Klarna were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Class Action Participation - Investors who purchased Klarna securities may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Integer Holdings Corporation common stock of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to alleged misleading statements made by the company during the specified class period [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from July 25, 2024, to October 22, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors who purchased Integer common stock during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 9, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Integer Holdings - The lawsuit alleges that Integer made materially false and misleading statements regarding its competitive position in the electrophysiology manufacturing market [5]. - It is claimed that Integer overstated its visibility into customer demand while experiencing a deterioration in sales for two of its electrophysiology devices [5]. - The company mischaracterized its electrophysiology devices as long-term growth drivers for its cardio and vascular segment, leading to misleading positive statements about its business and operations [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Coupang, Inc. securities between August 6, 2025, and December 16, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Coupang securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must file with the Court by February 17, 2026 [3] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Coupang made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose inadequate cybersecurity protocols that allowed unauthorized access to sensitive customer information for nearly six months [5] - It is claimed that this breach heightened the risk of regulatory and legal scrutiny, and the company did not report the breach in compliance with SEC reporting rules [5] - As a result of these actions, the public statements made by Coupang were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased CarMax, Inc. securities between June 20, 2025, and November 5, 2025, of the January 2, 2026, deadline to become lead plaintiffs in a securities class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought CarMax securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by January 2, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that CarMax's defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's growth prospects, which were overstated due to temporary market conditions [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Synopsys, Inc. securities between December 4, 2024, and September 9, 2025, of the December 30, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Synopsys securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by December 30, 2025 [2] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [5] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Synopsys' defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about the company's business and operations [4] - Specific allegations include the negative impact of Synopsys' focus on artificial intelligence customers on its Design IP business and the misleading nature of positive statements made by the defendants [4] - The lawsuit claims that when the true details were revealed, investors suffered damages as a result [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of StubHub Holdings, Inc. common stock about the January 23, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline related to a class action lawsuit following the company's September 2025 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased StubHub common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by January 23, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement was materially false and misleading, omitting critical information about changes in payment timing to vendors and its adverse impact on free cash flow [5]. - It is claimed that these omissions led to materially misleading reports on StubHub's free cash flow and positive statements about the company's business and prospects [5].