spinning the facts and trying to confuse the people that I wanted to come in this morning and just clearly explain for the people back home how we got here and why this vote is happening right now. First, a quick review of the relevant history here. For four long years under the previous administration or the Biden Harris administration, Democrats insisted there was no border crisis.Remember they told you that that wasn't a problem at all. They they dismissed inflation as transitory. That's what they told u ...

He announced that there is going to be a new investigation that is now going to be run out of the SDNY, the same people who prosecuted Epstein and Maxwell. This new investigation where all arrows point to Democrats and that's very convenient for Donald Trump because once there is a new investigation that gives DOJ a reason to say, "Well, we're going to hold some things back." you actually can't get everything because there's this ongoing investigation and putting everything out there would jeopardize the in ...

The world's largest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, is now in the Caribbean as tensions with Venezuela escalate. President Trump this weekend said he's quote sort of made up his mind about whether to attack.This comes as today Marines begin a week of joint training with Trinidad and Tobago. And after 20 strikes on alleged drug vessels in the region, Democrats warn a war with Venezuela is both a distraction and illegal. majority of drugs don't come through the Caribbean.They come via a land route, ...

TO SUPPORT THEIR WHAT THEY'VE BEEN SAYING ABOUT THESE QUOTE UNQUOTE, LIBERAL GROUPS. IF YOU WERE ADVISING ANY GROUPS OUT THERE THAT JUST HAPPEN TO BE A BLACK LED ORGANIZATION OR ORGANIZATION THAT PERHAPS SAW A BOON OF DOLLARS POST 2020 AFTER GEORGE FLOYD'S MURDER, WHAT WOULD YOU BE TELLING THEM RIGHT NOW. >> I'D BE TELLING THEM THIS IS A.POLITICAL HIT JOB. I MEAN, THE FACT IS, LOOK, IT'S NOT JUST THAT THEY'VE GONE AFTER AFTER. GEORGE SOROS.>> IT'S NOT. >> JUST THAT THEY INDICTED JAMES COMEY TO SHAMES JOHN B ...

Investigations of Donald Trump - Jack Smith is requesting to testify publicly regarding his investigations of Donald Trump [1] - The investigation techniques used likely informed both volumes of the report [6] - Republicans have misrepresented what Jack Smith did [4] Senate Judiciary Committee & Public Hearing - Senator Sheldon White House hopes the Senate moves first to conduct a public hearing [3] - The hearing could be very useful, particularly regarding volume two of the special counsel report [3] - The Senate should be informed about potential land strike, even in a classified session [16] Volume Two of Special Counsel Report - Volume two of the special counsel report has not been disclosed because the investigation was concluded [6] - Volume two is believed to contain a lot of interesting material [3][6] Legal and Prosecutorial Conduct - The contrast between proper legal behavior and the current Trump Department of Justice is notable [11] - Jack Smith is seen as a sober and serious expositor of that differentiation [12] - The difference between a trap and trace pen register and a wire tap should be understood [4][10]

Investigation & Legal Stance - Special Counsel Jack Smith offers to testify publicly regarding investigations into Trump's handling of classified documents and efforts to overturn the 2020 election, seeking assurance of no punishment from the DOJ [1] - Smith defends his team's data collection, stating it was narrowly tailored to January 4th-7th, 2021, focusing on telephonic activity surrounding the January 6th riots, aiming to confirm reports of Trump's attempts to influence senators [1] - The investigation is portrayed as a standard procedure to investigate Trump's efforts to prevent the certification of the election [2] - Smith has been increasingly vocal about the Justice Department and the rule of law under Trump, particularly regarding pardons for those involved in the January 6th Capitol attack [3][4] Communication & Public Perception - Smith's offer to testify publicly is seen as a strategic move to counter mischaracterizations and distortions by Republicans [9][10][11] - Smith's shift from silence to public engagement is attributed to the need to defend against accusations of a politicized investigation [11][12] - The discussion highlights the tension between the traditional DOJ approach of silence until trial and the need to inform the public, especially in the context of the January 6th investigation [15][16][17][18][19] - Some argue that federal prosecutors are revisiting the traditional approach and recognizing the need to communicate the story to the public [22] - Jim Jordan's refusal to comply with a subpoena related to January 6th is noted in the context of his criticism of the investigation [22][23]

Legal Proceedings & Allegations - Attorney General Pam Bondi, along with other key figures, declined interview requests regarding the case [1] - Amal Boi denied advising DOJ attorneys to violate court orders and questioned a line attorney's authority to bind the department's leadership [2] - Boi's judgeship confirmation followed claims of falsehoods and distortions related to the case [3] Case Details & Outcomes - Kilmar Abrego Garcia was returned to the US and charged with transporting illegal immigrants, pleading not guilty [3][4] - A judge criticized the Justice Department's attempts to connect Garcia to MS-13, and he was not charged with terrorism [4] - Prisoners sent to El Salvador were released to Venezuela [4] - The Supreme Court unanimously agreed that the prisoners were entitled to their day in court [4]

We've got a lot to get to with this great panel. I want to bring in MSNBC justice and intelligence correspondent Ken Delaneian, who's been tracking all of this for us. Also here, MSNBC political analyst and former director of the DOJ's public affairs office, Anthony Coley, is on set with me.And our national security and intel analyst, Michael Fineberg, who recently resigned from the FBI under pressure because of his ties to a Trump critic. Thanks to all of you for joining us. Ken, I'll just start with you r ...

Allegations of Misconduct within the Justice Department - A former Justice Department attorney, Arez Ruvanei, alleges witnessing government lawyers lying in court and evading judicial orders [1][2] - Ruvanei claims that a high-ranking Justice Department official instructed attorneys to disregard potential court orders related to the expulsion of Venezuelans [9][10] - Ruvanei states he was ordered to falsely accuse a deported individual of being a gang member and terrorist [20] - Law professor Ryan Goodman's analysis indicates over 35 cases where judges accused the Justice Department of providing false information, including false sworn declarations [20][21] Due Process and Legal Principles - The core issue revolves around the denial of due process rights to individuals, regardless of their alleged affiliations [17][18][20] - The principle that everyone deserves their day in court is emphasized as a fundamental aspect of the American legal system [17][18] - Concerns are raised that the Justice Department's actions could set a precedent for arbitrary accusations and deprivation of liberty [20] - The Supreme Court unanimously agreed that the Venezuelan prisoners were entitled to their day in court [27] Repercussions and Responses - Arez Ruvanei was fired after refusing to sign a brief containing false information and subsequently filed a whistleblower disclosure [20] - Amal Boie, a former Justice Department official, denied advising attorneys to violate court orders and dismissed Ruvanei's claims as falsehoods and distortions [24][26]

Justice System Integrity - Concerns raised about the potential manipulation of the American justice system, suggesting a departure from impartiality and the rule of law [1] - The discussion highlights the importance of the Department of Justice operating without fear or favor, emphasizing that justice should be blind [1] - The report suggests a perception that political orientation is influencing legal decisions, potentially undermining trust in institutions [1] Political Retribution - The report indicates a focus on retribution within the current administration, with potential implications for individuals targeted [2] - There's an observation that individuals joining the administration may underestimate the extent of the retribution campaign [2] - The report mentions potential internal conflicts and hesitations among those tasked with executing the retribution agenda [2] Key Individuals - Pam Bondi's standing within Trump's inner circle is reportedly low, possibly due to perceived missteps related to the Epstein case [1] - Howard Lutnik also has low standing with the president's advisors [1] - Lindseay Halligan's actions are being scrutinized, with questions raised about whether they are being coordinated with key advisors [1]