Core Viewpoint - VoIP-Pal.com Inc. has initiated a fourth federal lawsuit against major tech companies, alleging antitrust violations related to mobile operating systems and Wi-Fi calling services [1][2]. Legal Actions - The new lawsuit, Case No. 1:25-cv-01970, is a nationwide consumer class action against Apple Inc., Google LLC, and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [1] - The complaint claims that the defendants have used their control over mobile operating systems to exclude standalone Wi-Fi Calling, thereby forcing consumers into bundled voice plans and suppressing competition [2]. - VoIP-Pal is seeking structural relief, treble damages, and market correction under the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, and RICO [2]. Company Overview - VoIP-Pal.com Inc. is a publicly traded corporation headquartered in Waco, Texas, and it owns a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology [4]. - The company is actively seeking to monetize its patent portfolio [4]. Market Vision - In a recent interview, CEO Emil Malak discussed the company's litigation strategy and market vision, emphasizing the broader implications of its antitrust actions [3]. - The full Q&A is available for public access, providing insights into the company's future direction and legal approach [3].

Core Viewpoint - VoIP-Pal.com Inc. has filed a new federal antitrust lawsuit against major tech companies and telecom providers, alleging a coordinated effort to suppress competition in standalone Wi-Fi Calling, marking a significant shift from patent enforcement to broader statutory actions [2][4][5]. Group 1: Antitrust Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit names Google, Apple, and Samsung as primary defendants, with AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile identified as co-conspirators in the alleged suppression of competition [2][4]. - This is the third major legal action taken by VoIP-Pal, focusing on what the company claims is a long-standing structure of exclusion and control over mobile voice infrastructure [2][4]. - The complaint seeks to represent approximately 373 million U.S. mobile subscribers who have allegedly been harmed by exclusionary practices that limit access to non-carrier Wi-Fi-based calling [5]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Company Position - VoIP-Pal is shifting its legal strategy from asserting patent rights to challenging market dominance and exclusion of competition under various statutes, including the Sherman Act and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 [4][5]. - The company has developed key technologies since 2005 aimed at providing affordable voice services over Wi-Fi, but claims it has been systematically denied access to the necessary infrastructure [5][6]. - VoIP-Pal encourages federal and state regulators to examine the systemic barriers described in its filings and remains open to constructive engagement with all parties involved [6]. Group 3: Company Background - VoIP-Pal.com Inc. is a publicly traded corporation based in Waco, Texas, with a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology that it seeks to monetize [7].

Core Insights - VoIP-Pal.com Inc. has filed two Second Amended Complaints against major telecom companies AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, focusing on allegations of forced tying, deceptive marketing practices, and unauthorized use of patented technology [2][4]. Legal Actions - The first complaint is an individual action by VoIP-Pal under antitrust, RICO, and telecommunications law, claiming exclusion from the Wi-Fi Calling market and unauthorized use of its patented call routing system [4]. - The second complaint is a nationwide class action representing approximately 373 million U.S. mobile subscribers, alleging systemic overbilling and deceptive bundling of services [4]. Allegations and Damages - The complaints highlight a total of $628.41 billion in alleged damages under RICO, Antitrust, and Telecommunications law, emphasizing the historic scope of damages related to structural fraud and consumer deception [2][3]. Company Overview - VoIP-Pal is a publicly traded corporation based in Waco, Texas, owning a portfolio of patents related to Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology, which it aims to monetize [5].