Core Insights - Aave Labs is developing a revenue-sharing plan aimed at redistributing value to AAVE token holders following governance disputes regarding fees and brand control [1][2] - The proposal will focus on sharing revenue generated outside the main lending protocol with AAVE holders, addressing community concerns over revenue allocation [1][3] Governance Disputes - Tensions arose between Aave Labs and DAO members over the distribution of revenue from Aave-branded products, particularly from app.aave.com, which critics argued should benefit the DAO [2][3] - A community vote on whether to transfer control of core brand assets to the DAO resulted in 55% against, 41% abstaining, and only 3.5% in favor, highlighting divisions within the community [4] Revenue and Market Performance - AAVE crypto was trading near $176, reflecting a 2.8% increase in the past day, with a trading volume of approximately $348 million [5] - The market cap of AAVE reportedly decreased by around $500 million following the public dispute, indicating a loss of trust among stakeholders [5]

Core Viewpoint - A debate within Aave's DAO has emerged regarding control over the protocol's interface and the financial benefits derived from it, particularly following the integration of CoWSwap into the Aave platform [1][2]. Group 1: Integration and Financial Implications - Aave Labs integrated CoWSwap into the app.aave.com interface, replacing Paraswap, which was presented as an upgrade for user experience and improved execution [1][2]. - The integration has led to swap-related fees no longer contributing to the Aave DAO treasury, with fees now accruing to an external recipient, estimated at 15 to 25 basis points [2]. - On-chain data indicates that the partner-fee mechanism associated with CoWSwap could yield millions of dollars annually, although this surplus has decreased due to a shift in routing logic [3]. Group 2: Governance and Operational Structure - Aave Labs clarified that the interface operates independently from the DAO-governed protocol, with the DAO managing on-chain parameters while Aave Labs controls application-level features [4]. - The company argues that monetization applies only to accessory features, maintaining protocol neutrality and preventing centralization of economic control [5]. Group 3: Criticism and Concerns - Critics, including members from the Aave Chan Initiative, express concerns that monetization from the frontend was expected to benefit the DAO, given the contributions from tokenholders [6]. - There are claims that CoWSwap's solvers are increasingly utilizing free flash loans from other protocols, which diverts user flow and fees away from Aave, further impacting DAO revenue [7]. - Aave Labs responded by stating that the previous surplus from Paraswap was not a guaranteed entitlement and that alternative frontends remain available for the DAO to utilize [8].

Core Viewpoint - A dispute has arisen between the Aave community and Aave Labs regarding revenue sharing following the integration of CoW Swap, which has led to significant financial implications for the Aave DAO treasury [1][2]. Group 1: Revenue Impact - The integration of CoW Swap has resulted in the loss of a revenue stream estimated at approximately $200,000 per week, translating to an annualized impact of around $10 million [2]. - This change is perceived as shifting value away from AAVE token holders, raising concerns among governance delegates [2]. Group 2: Governance and Decision-Making - Marc Zeller, founder of the Aave Chan Initiative, criticized Aave Labs for making unilateral changes to the economic arrangement without DAO approval, which he views as a breach of fiduciary duty [3]. - Zeller expressed concerns about the implications of this decision on future upgrades, particularly the upcoming V4 upgrade, questioning whether other features could be similarly restricted from DAO oversight [4]. Group 3: Defense from Aave Labs - Stani Kulechov, CEO of Aave Labs, defended the integration, arguing that the previous fees from ParaSwap were not mandatory protocol fees but rather a "discretionary surplus" [5].

Industry Focus - HairDAO utilizes Ethereum to facilitate and manage hair loss research, showcasing the potential of on-chain collaboration in accelerating scientific advancements [1] - The organization is conducting in-depth reviews to determine the effectiveness of various hair-growth treatments [1]

Core Insights - World Liberty Financial, a crypto project associated with the Trump family, has initiated a buyback of its WLFI tokens, spending $10 million to acquire over 59 million tokens through CoW Swap, following a governance vote that approved the use of generated fees for buybacks and token burns [1][2]. Company Overview - World Liberty Financial is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol aiming to provide lending, borrowing, and exchange services using its USD1 stablecoin [2]. - The project previously sold 35 billion WLFI tokens for a total of $550 million between October and March, allowing token holders to vote on protocol decisions [5]. Market Performance - Despite the buyback efforts, WLFI has seen minimal investor interest, with only a 0.4% increase in trading over the past 24 hours and a 50% decline from its all-time high in September [2]. - The buyback on October 10 involved approximately $9 million for nearly 51 million tokens, indicating a trend among DeFi protocols to buy back tokens to boost investor confidence [6]. Industry Trends - A report from Keyrock highlighted that the top 12 revenue-distributing DeFi protocols collectively spent nearly $800 million on token buybacks and revenue-sharing activities in July, marking a more than 400% increase since the beginning of 2024 [7]. - The practice of buybacks in the crypto space is likened to public companies, where it serves to signal long-term commitment and enhance token value [8].

Or this Arbitrum proposal "A Vision for the Future of Arbitrum""Many of the bottlenecks facing the ArbitrumDAO is due to the lack of participation from The Arbitrum Foundation and Offchain Labs…We think it is time to rectify it and to be more actively involved to support the ArbitrumDAO."or“We expect the number of proposals will significantly diminish in favor of more informal feedback loops… before anything reaches the DAO.” ...

Overview - TRON DAO is a community-governed decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) [1] - TRON DAO is dedicated to the growth of the TRON chain [1] Technology - TRON DAO supports the TRC-20 standards for decentralized applications and smart contracts [1]

Core Insights - 1inch Network, a decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator, has achieved a significant milestone by routing $500 billion in trades on the Ethereum network since its launch in 2019 [1] - The protocol's total swap volume across all chains has reportedly surpassed $700 billion, although this figure contrasts with third-party analytics that show approximately $235 billion [2] - Dune Analytics reports a total trade amount exceeding $716 billion, indicating discrepancies in data aggregation methodologies [3] Competition and Market Dynamics - 1inch remains a leader in the DEX aggregator space, but faces increasing competition, with CoW Swap capturing over 26% of the Ethereum market share as of January 2025 [4] - The rise of new models, such as dark pools on Solana, highlights the competitive landscape within the DeFi sector [4] Economic and Governance Challenges - The 1INCH token has an indirect value capture mechanism, leading to frustration among holders due to its disconnect from the protocol's trading fees [5] - Users must lock their tokens to receive "Unicorn Power," which can be delegated to resolvers for profit sharing, but this system does not directly tie rewards to the platform's trading volume [6] - Historical discussions within governance forums indicate ongoing debates about using the DAO's treasury to reward stakers, with concerns about the need for a self-sustaining revenue model [7] Financial Viability and Security Concerns - The 1inch DAO currently holds a treasury of approximately $10.9 million, with funding from 1inch Labs reportedly halted two years ago, raising questions about long-term viability [8] - The protocol faced a security incident in March 2025, resulting in a loss of $5 million due to an exploit [8]

Project Proposal - Tabi proposes a collaboration with Nouns DAO for a Nouns Korea Meetup [2] - The proposal aligns with Nouns DAO's governance process [1][2] Nouns DAO Overview - Nouns DAO is a crypto-native, community-driven decentralized autonomous organization [1] - It fosters transparent governance and a participatory ecosystem through community voting [1] Event Details - The X Space event is scheduled for tonight at 11:00 PM KST at @nounsdao [2]

RT Developer DAO (🧱, 🚀) (@developer_dao)🎙️ Calling all NYC builders!Did you know that @BNBCHAIN has an IRL workspace in New York for founders, builders and investor to co-mingle?Hear @0xmarwan tell us all about the Builder Bunker and how you can get involved in this clip from @devntellxyz 👇 https://t.co/AMlw9srp22 ...