Vitalik Buterin published a post stating that the core issue of current decentralized governance (such as DAOs) lies in the scarcity of human attention, while traditional mechanisms tend to lead to the concentration of power. To this end, he proposed utilizing personal Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve this problem. Additionally, he emphasized the importance of privacy in these mechanisms. https://t.co/tzhtzcFJK2 ...

"AI becomes the government" is dystopian: it leads to slop when AI is weak, and is doom-maximizing once AI becomes strong. But AI used well can be empowering, and push the frontier of democratic / decentralized modes of governance.The core problem with democratic / decentralized modes of governance (including DAOs on ethereum) is limits to human attention: there are many thousands of decisions to make, involving many domains of expertise, and most people don't have the time or skill to be experts in even on ...

Но есть тоже другой момент: децентрализованное управление не только как результат, а как процесс.Сейчас оппозиции очень нужны новые «герои» и новые идеи. Как их найти, и дать им шанс? Через более демократичную структуру. Как решить детали политических реформ или договора между Россией и Европейскими странами который более оптимизирован для целей о которых я писал? Как лучше найти детали плана который может удовлетворять 70%, чем спрашивать этих 70%?Один важный момент, что самые новые теории «цифровой демокр ...

Vitalik Buterin shared updated views on the convergence of Ethereum and AI, arguing against pursuing "accelerationist AGI" and instead advocating a positive path that prioritizes human freedom and safety by integrating crypto and AI perspectives. His focus includes building trust-minimized, privacy-preserving AI interaction tools (such as local LLMs, ZK-enabled API payments, and client-side verifiable proofs); positioning Ethereum as the economic layer for AI interactions (supporting AI-to-AI coordination, ...

$SKR is now live on Kraken 📱$SKR by @solanamobile powers the Seeker ecosystem through decentralized governance, staking rewards, and secure device verificationOwn your mobile experience → https://t.co/q57XhPZUqg*Geographic restrictions apply https://t.co/FzvDtZRD4I ...

Most DAOs are run by three groups:1. core team/foundation2. professional delegates3. token whalesProfessional delegates exist because 1) most token holders ignore governance, 2) 95% of votes are "upgrade to v4.2.1," and 3) someone has to get paid to care.This setup was meant to prevent attacks like Compound's in 2024, where a whale bought tokens and voted to drain $24M in $COMP tokens because only 57 addresses voted.No one cared to vote.This tri-alliance has multiple flaws from Vitalik mentioned vulnerabili ...

分组1 - Aave's community is experiencing a significant divide over control of the protocol's brand and assets, highlighting the tension between decentralized governance and centralized development teams [1] - The dispute was sparked by Aave's integration of CoW Swap, which directed swap fees to Aave Labs instead of the DAO treasury, raising questions about brand control and economic risk alignment [1] - Supporters of DAO control argue it would ensure governance rights align with those bearing economic risk, while opponents believe it could hinder development and accountability [1] 分组2 - Ethereum developers are advancing plans for the "Glamsterdam" upgrade, which includes the Amsterdam and Gloas upgrades on its execution and consensus layers respectively [2] - The core proposal of Glamsterdam is the enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS), aimed at preventing any single actor from controlling transaction inclusion and order [2] - ePBS would enhance security by allowing block builders to assemble blocks without revealing their contents to proposers, thereby reducing manipulation opportunities related to maximal extractable value (MEV) [2]

RT Web3 Foundation (@Web3foundation)Decentralized Voices has evolved governance through authentic debate, accountability, and meaningful engagement. While cohort 5 will be the last for now, the lessons and impact will continue.Read more here: https://t.co/ND86mfrN3H ...

Core Insights - Ownership coins are expected to revolutionize decentralized governance by 2026, with projections indicating at least one project may exceed a $1 billion market cap [1] - These coins integrate economic, legal, and governance rights into a single asset, addressing long-standing challenges faced by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) [1][3] Group 1: Ownership Coins vs. Traditional Governance Tokens - Traditional governance tokens in DAOs typically provide only voting rights, lacking substantial economic power or legal accountability, which introduces investment risks [2] - Ownership coins represent a significant design shift, combining various rights into a legally enforceable digital asset, thereby enhancing accountability within DAOs [3] Group 2: Practical Applications and Innovations - Token holders of ownership coins gain enforceable control over digital organizations with tangible assets, paving the way for legally recognized self-governed on-chain entities [4] - MetaDAO is an early adopter of this framework, utilizing futarchy principles to guide decisions through prediction markets rather than traditional voting [4] Group 3: Market Performance and Growth Potential - The Messari Theses report identifies ownership coins as a key investment opportunity for 2026, highlighting AVICI as a top performer with significant growth potential [5] - AVICI has demonstrated strong holder retention and broad distribution, with 12,752 holders as of mid-December 2025, despite experiencing price volatility [5] - The token's holder count increased from 4,000 to 13,300 in just 45 days, showcasing community resilience even during a 65% price decline [6]

RT Ignas | DeFi (@DefiIgnas)Most DAOs are abandoning decentralized governance.Aave is resisting this trend for the benefit of all DAOs and their token holders.Acquisitions like Axelar's, which completely disregard token holders, set a terrible precedent.It makes DeFi tokens uninvestable: token holders face all the risks but gain little upside.At the same time, DAOs can't be vulnerable for extraction by supposedly aligned entities.Case in question is Compound: despite being a leader in lending in the past, i ...