Okay, we got a lot of stuff going on today. We're following the breaking news stories out of Australia and out of Providence, Rhode Island. But I want to shift for a moment to another important story. The Trump administration's continued crackdown on immigration in America. Recently, President Trump has turned his eyeire toward the Somali community, particularly those in Minneapolis and the city of in Minnesota and the city of Minneapolis. Beyond targeting Somali Americans broadly, he's aimed many of his at ...

We tracked down US Border Patrol Chief Agent Greg Bonino amid this unprecedented immigration crackdown here in New Orleans and asked him two questions. >> Why have you detained so many American citizens. Mr.. Bino, >> you need to step back. >> Mr. . Bino, >> last time.>> How do you respond to accusations racial profiling, Mr. . Those ignored questions coming after federal agents chased down American citizen Joselyn Gusman right here in Louisiana. >> Leave me alone.>> Broke through the window of American cit ...

There is new pressure mounting on White House borders are Tom Hman and the Trump administration amid increased reports of federal agents detaining US citizens. In Miami, video apparently showing officers stopping a woman's car and appearing to push her to the ground as she yells she is in fact a citizen. In Minnesota, local papers reporting ICE arrested another US citizen, a Somali American, and held her for 24 hours.She says while they allegedly made derogatory comments about her Muslim headscarf and MS no ...

Today, Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bravino is already touting dozens of immigration arrests in Charlotte, North Carolina as Operation Charlotte's Web has been underway. This as federal a immigration agents have come under increased scrutiny over their aggressive tactics and for often being masked and not identifying themselves while out carrying arrests. House Democrats are working to change all of that.In a recent letter, Congressman Rob Mendez and Dan Goldman, they've been urging top DHI, DHS, and ICE off ...

Political & Legal Concerns - Deployment of the National Guard is described as illegal and unconstitutional, raising concerns about authoritarianism and breaking the Constitution [1][5] - The Insurrection Act is being considered, leading to clashes of rhetoric and troop deployment [3] - A judge declined to immediately respond to a lawsuit filed by the State of Illinois, challenging the legality of sending in the National Guard against the state's wishes [5] - A judge warned federal lawyers against deploying the National Guard before an official ruling, highlighting potential legal risks [7] - The Illinois Attorney General argues that the American people should not live under the threat of occupation by the US military [8] Operational & Logistical Aspects - The Texas National Guard has arrived in Chicago, with military members seen in camouflage and carrying long guns [4] - The presence of out-of-state troops is occurring while a judge is reviewing the legality of their deployment [5] - The Broadview ICE Detention Facility is being used as a staging location for federal agents and detainees [22] Social & Community Impact - Concerns are raised about the targeting of individuals based on their looks, particularly in Hispanic communities [26][27] - Individuals are being picked up off the street, raising questions about the reasons and legality of these actions [19] - Reports indicate that Border Patrol agents are operating within 100 miles of Lake Michigan, claiming it as a border with Canada [25] - An attorney claims a Border Patrol agent shot a woman and allegedly said "Do something B word" before shooting, contradicting the government's initial explanation [29]

Immigration Enforcement Tactics - ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) tactics against residents are escalating, including raids on entire apartment buildings [1][12] - Agents are accused of separating children from parents and detaining US citizens [4][3] - Racial profiling is alleged in stops and detentions [7][8] - A federal judge initially ruled against ICE sweeps, but the Supreme Court allowed them to continue for now [8][9][10] Legal and Constitutional Concerns - The raids raise questions about the legality of the tactics and potential violations of constitutional rights [4][8] - The "Kavanaugh stop" allows ICE to continue violent raids and stops [10] - The right to be free from unlawful searches and seizures is a fundamental American principle [14] Impact on Individuals - Individuals, including US citizens, have been mistakenly arrested and detained [3][14] - Some individuals have experienced physical harm during detentions [5][6] - Detainees have faced challenges proving their citizenship [11]

Core Message - The speech emphasizes the importance of listening to and trusting diverse voices to achieve social change [1][8][11][18][19] - It advocates for inclusivity in problem-solving and decision-making processes, especially for those whose voices are often unheard [1][8][10][11] - The speaker shares a personal story of injustice to illustrate the consequences of distrust and the power of collective action [1][6][15] Key Arguments - Social change requires bridging the gap between different perspectives by actively listening to all voices, not just the loudest [1][8][11] - Systems and policies should include the voices of the people they affect, particularly marginalized groups [8][9][10] - Assumptions can hinder effective solutions; it's crucial to challenge them and seek diverse input [12][13] - Trust is essential for building bridges and creating positive change, contrasting with systems built on distrust [15][18] Personal Experience & Advocacy - The speaker recounts being part of 50,000 families falsely accused of tax fraud by the Dutch government, leading to financial hardship and distrust [1] - This experience motivated the speaker to advocate for children and young people affected by the crisis, leading to the creation of a foundation for equal and just recovery [4][6] - The speaker highlights the importance of turning personal pain and shame into strength to drive social change [20]

Constitutional Law & Civil Rights - The Supreme Court's decision allows federal agents to racially profile individuals during immigration sweeps in Los Angeles, potentially violating the Fourth Amendment [1][9] - The Fourth Amendment, designed to protect against unreasonable searches and seizures, is being undermined by the court's ruling, raising concerns about government overreach [2][7][10] - Justice Sotomayor dissented, arguing against a society where individuals are targeted based on ethnicity and appearance [12] - The ruling suggests that constitutional protections are conditional and can be disregarded based on perceived immigration status [13][18] - The Supreme Court's use of the "shadow docket" to issue the decision without oral arguments or explanation raises concerns about transparency and accountability [11][25] Societal Impact & Legal Precedent - The decision normalizes racial profiling and potentially creates a police state where constitutional rights are diminished [23][24] - The ruling could weaken constitutional protections for all individuals, not just specific groups [24] - The Supreme Court's actions are perceived as abandoning basic constitutional principles and granting the government excessive discretion [19] - The decision is seen as part of a series of rulings that approve actions violating the Constitution [22] - The ruling may damage the Supreme Court's legacy and undermine democracy for generations [27]

Immigration Enforcement Concerns - The report highlights concerns about potential racial profiling in immigration enforcement tactics, with claims that individuals are targeted based on skin color [1][3][9] - The report mentions an ACLU lawsuit alleging systematic targeting of brown people by the Trump administration's immigration enforcement [3] - The report raises questions about due process and the rights of citizens and legal residents during immigration enforcement actions [10][15] Individual Experience and Perspective - Brian Gvidia, an East LA resident and former Trump voter, recounts his experience of being arrested by ICE agents despite being an American citizen [1][2] - Gvidia expresses feeling "disgusted" and regrets his vote, stating he never believed communities would be attacked in this way [6][7] - Gvidia clarifies that he believed mass deportations would target hardened criminals, not day laborers or farm workers [8] - Gvidia emphasizes the importance of following the law and respecting constitutional rights for all individuals, documented or undocumented [14][15] Administration's Stance vs Personal Accounts - The report contrasts DHS Secretary's claim that ICE agents are not profiling people by race with Gvidia's personal experience and observations [9] - Gvidia questions the administration's actions, asking what happened to him and others if racial profiling is not occurring [9] - The report conveys the fear and anxiety experienced by individuals and communities due to the current immigration enforcement climate [8][11]

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to lift a ban on a Los Angeles-area immigration crackdown that opponents say relies on racial profiling to decide who to detain https://t.co/f98doWKw1N ...