hell yeahUnder Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers (@UnderSecPD):WE'VE SANCTIONED: Clare Melford. She leads Global Disinformation Index (GDI), a UK-based organization that monitors websites for “hate speech” and “disinformation”. If you question Canadian blood libels about residential schools, you're engaging in “hate speech” according to https://t.co/5F3fU4hf4R ...

Main Argument - The core argument is that society is becoming increasingly desensitized to disinformation, leading to a dangerous indifference that erodes ethical standards and harms society [2][5][6][10] - The speaker advocates for proactive measures, specifically "weird checking," to combat disinformation by challenging the social norm of accepting lies [28][30] Problem Definition - Disinformation, defined as intentionally deceptive false information, is distinct from misinformation, which is unintentional [11][13] - The speaker highlights the phenomenon of "deception fatigue," where repeated exposure to dishonesty diminishes emotional and moral responses [20] - Disinformation has significant real-world consequences, including contributing to preventable deaths (e g, 330,000+ deaths during the HIV/AIDS epidemic in South Africa), fueling distrust in election results, and costing the global economy an estimated $78 billion USD annually [8][9] Proposed Solution - "Weird checking" is introduced as a method to counteract disinformation by questioning the normality of spreading fake news, thereby influencing social norms [28][29] - Individuals are encouraged to actively resist disinformation by calling out those who spread it, reinforcing the idea that such behavior is socially unacceptable [30][31] Social Norms and Behavior - Social norms significantly influence human behavior, and the normalization of dishonesty creates a dangerous feedback loop [23][26] - The speaker draws a parallel to the shift in social norms around smoking, suggesting that similar changes are possible with disinformation [24][25] Call to Action - The speaker urges individuals to resist passivity and actively condemn dishonesty to preserve their own moral compass and protect society from the harmful effects of disinformation [32][33][35]

Disinformation Suppression & Censorship - Rejects sweeping censorship under the guise of "disinformation" suppression [1] - Advocates for decentralized, crowd-sourced annotations to empower audiences to discern true information [1] - Aims to avoid biased curation of information [1] Digital Freedom Initiative - Investigates approaches as part of the State Department's Digital Freedom initiative [1]

Social Issues - Governments need to tackle new social problems like loneliness and disinformation to serve their people [1] Governance - The article highlights the need for governments to address emerging social challenges [1]

Brazil has made “disinformation” a criminal offense and its tyrant judges the sole arbiter of whatever the fuck that term meansEstadão 🗞️ (@Estadao):EDITORIAL | O Supremo cria o crime de ‘desinformação’ – “A Constituição, que deveria ser um aparato para conter o arbítrio, passou a ser manipulada como um instrumento para praticá-lo”. Leia o texto completo em > https://t.co/iHNiXryA1e (via @opiniao_estadao) https://t.co/hIL47j6MwL ...

Industry Focus: Digital Disinformation & Psychological Operations - The report highlights concerns about government-funded university labs partnering with private censorship firms to develop psychological inoculation videos [1] - The core issue revolves around the potential for "digital disinformation" and "psychological inoculation" tactics [1] - The report draws a parallel between current practices and the historical MKULTRA project, suggesting a continuation of intelligence agency involvement in behavioral psychology [1] Key Argument - The author argues that these partnerships aim to "psychologically brainwash" the public into accepting a specific set of beliefs [1] - The author labels this phenomenon "Digital MKUltra" [1]

Media Landscape & Disinformation - MSNBC is criticized for spreading disinformation [1] - The network is accused of lacking facts and a significant audience [1] Law Enforcement & Accountability - The FBI emphasizes following the chain of command [1] - Failure to comply with the chain of command may result in consequences [1]

Censorship & Disinformation - The National Academy of Sciences is heavily involved in censorship, producing a significant amount of "disinformation studies" [1] - These studies are allegedly targeted at Trump supporters and policy critics [1] - The National Academy of Sciences' politicization is highlighted [1] - No government agency requested the NAS to weigh in on the matter [1] Political Agenda - A report by the National Academies is described as "rigged" to thwart Trump's energy agenda [1]

Free Speech & Political Hypocrisy - The report highlights a perceived hypocrisy where some conservatives, who once championed free speech, now appear to support its restriction when it comes to views they disagree with [2][3] - The report suggests a narrative of selective outrage, where certain groups express strong condemnation of some speech while excusing or downplaying other potentially offensive or harmful speech [3][12] - The report points out the spread of disinformation, specifically regarding alleged censorship by the Biden administration, and how difficult it was to counter the false narrative [14][15] Authoritarianism & Media Control - The report draws parallels between current events and the actions of authoritarian leaders like Viktor Orban in Hungary and Vladimir Putin in Russia, particularly concerning media control [5][6] - The report emphasizes the suppression of dissenting voices and the targeting of media outlets critical of those in power, citing the example of a comedy show being removed from the air in Russia [7][8] - The report suggests that the issue is not about free speech for all, but rather about protecting the speech of those who align with a particular political ideology [9] Callous Remarks & Apologies - The report mentions a controversial statement made on Fox News regarding homeless people, including a suggestion of "involuntary lethal injection," which was later apologized for [11][12] - The report contrasts the apology for the aforementioned callous remark with the perceived lack of accountability for spreading disinformation [12][15] Political Strategy & Revenge - The report suggests that certain groups are focused on using institutions like the FCC as tools for political revenge and media control [16]

Threats to Science and Public Health - Scientists like Michael Man and Peter Hotz face organized attacks from climate deniers and vaccine skeptics, sometimes sanctioned by government officials [1][2] - These attacks aim to undermine public faith in science, which is crucial for addressing climate change, pandemics, and other crises [2][14] - Misinformation and disinformation, amplified by social media and AI, pose a significant threat to tackling global challenges [22] The Anti-Science Movement - Five forces drive the anti-science movement: propagandists, bureaucrats, and others who weaponize platforms to spread misinformation [14] - Organized misinformation led to an estimated 200,000 American deaths due to vaccine refusal [10][11] - Financial incentives, such as selling low-cost generics at inflated prices, motivate some to discredit science and scientists [11][12] Defending Science - Science relies on peer review, scientific meetings, and other established processes to refine and validate research [17][18][23] - Engaging with bad faith actors who reject scientific evidence is unproductive [18] - Media's "performative neutrality" or "false objectivity" can give undue weight to unscientific viewpoints [20][21]