Trump encouraged mortgage fraud case against New York Attorney General Leticia James is such a colossal prosecutorial nothing failure for his Department of Justice that it has already come up short collapsed two times. It was first dismissed because DOJ unlawfully appointed prosecutor Lindseay Halligan in the Eastern District of Virginia. She was of course appointed when the US attorney who was supposed to be there resigned suddenly under pressure after he resisted bringing the cases against Jim Comey and T ...

Legal & Compliance Risks - The DOJ is indicting former Trump official John Bolton for allegedly mishandling classified information, involving 18 criminal counts related to retention and transmission of national defense information [1][2] - Allegedly, Bolton shared over 1,000 pages of information about his activities as NSA with unauthorized individuals, potentially his wife and daughter, via a commercial messaging application [3][4] - The core of the case revolves around Bolton allegedly keeping notes/diary entries with classified information and sharing it with unauthorized individuals, which constitutes unlawful transmission [5] - Legal experts note the existence of a longer case record, but also question the DOJ's impartiality given recent actions and potential political motivations [8][10][21] - Concerns are raised about selective prosecution, comparing Bolton's case to similar conduct by others who were not investigated [27][28] National Security Implications - The indictment details the transmission of classified information, including top-secret information, over unclassified communication systems like Gmail [22][23] - This transmission to unauthorized individuals (wife and daughter) posed a security risk, as a hack occurred [23] - The case is considered serious due to the nature of the classified information involved and the potential compromise of national security [22][25] Political & Reputational Risks - The case raises questions about potential political targeting, given Trump's past criticisms of Bolton [5][7][13] - The indictment may be perceived as part of a broader pattern of actions by the DOJ that are influenced by political considerations [9][10][11] - The case could impact perceptions of fairness and impartiality within the justice system, potentially leading to a systemic flaw [27] - Bolton's reputation as a conservative Republican is highlighted, emphasizing the potential impact of the case on individuals who break with Trump [14][18]

President Trump has named his enemies list and in the past few weeks the DOJ has been on a tear against them. We followed several indictments and now there's a grand jury and panel looking at charges against John Bolton, a former Trump aid. Uh Trump has basically tried to turn the DOJ into a sort of selective prosecution operation.That of course is unlawful if defense council has the evidence that Trump was basically ordering these cases regardless of the facts and that the facts don't support the charges. ...

Comeies, it's worth noting James Comey's son-in-law um who is I believe married to Meen Comey, his daughter, who was fired from um uh the Southern District of New York, I do believe, is where she served. His son-in-law used to work in the Eastern District of Virginia office up until they indicted his father-in-law and he resigned in defense of the Constitution. And so, I think Mark's point about look, this is not business as usual.This isn't even politics as usual. What we are the president is weaponizing f ...

Legal Proceedings & Potential Outcomes - The case against James Comey is viewed by some legal experts as a vindictive and selective prosecution [1] - The defense plans to file motions around selective malicious prosecution, acknowledging the high legal bar [4] - Evidence suggests actual vindictiveness from the government towards Comey could lead to the case's dismissal [7][8] - Concerns exist regarding the unusual handling of the case, including the appointment of inexperienced prosecutors and the lack of clarity regarding the alleged false statements [1][2] - The defense argues the prosecution is targeting Comey in a way that wouldn't be applied to others [7] Key Individuals & Their Roles - Former FBI Director James Comey pleaded not guilty in federal court [1] - Lindseay Halligan, a prosecutor with limited experience, was handpicked to lead the case after the previous US attorney refused to indict Comey [1] - Patrick Fitzgerald, Comey's defense lawyer, intends to file motions challenging the prosecution [1][4] - Morin Comey, James Comey's daughter and former federal prosecutor, was present at the arraignment [1] Political Context & Motivations - President Trump's repeated calls to prosecute Comey are noted as a driving force behind the case [1] - The prosecution is perceived by some as a means to keep Comey under a cloud of suspicion, regardless of the ultimate verdict [1] - A message from Trump urging Comey's prosecution was accidentally posted publicly, suggesting a personal agenda [4][5]

Legal Proceedings & Strategy - The legal team intends to file motions for selective prosecution and unlawful appointment of the interim US attorney, aiming to dismiss the case before trial [2][12][13] - Discovery prospects are extensive, potentially involving White House and Justice Department communications, and grand jury proceedings [2] - The defense may argue the prosecution is retaliatory, violating free speech rights [13] - The White House might assert executive privilege to withhold certain communications [22] Potential Outcomes & Motivations - A conviction is considered a success for the Trump White House, potentially across multiple investigations [9][11] - James Comey may seek vindication through a jury trial, aiming to prove his innocence [7] - There are concerns about potential retribution from the Trump administration, including frivolous lawsuits and IRS targeting [16][17] Key Individuals & Dynamics - James Comey's confidence is noted, but this is his first time being on the defense side [5] - The involvement of Pam Bondi and potential White House coordination are under scrutiny [20][21] - An FBI agent was allegedly fired for refusing to do a "perp walk" with James Comey, indicating a desire for public spectacle [18]

Case Strength & Legality - The case against Comey is potentially weak due to a former US attorney with Republican ties declining to bring charges and an inspector general report finding Comey credible [3] - The involvement of political appointees alone in the grand jury indictment process raises concerns about the case's integrity [4] - Legal malpractice is a potential risk, especially considering the US attorney with no prosecution experience seeking the indictment [8] - Selective prosecution is a concern, suggesting the case might be biased against an individual for their beliefs or lawful actions [17] - Only 14 out of 23 grand jurors voted to indict on two counts, with a third count declined, further indicating a lack of consensus [15] Political Implications & Justice System - Concerns exist that the prosecution is driven by revenge and could set a precedent for future administrations to target political enemies [6][10] - The Department of Justice is potentially being used as a tool to target critics or those who have investigated or prosecuted the president [19] - There's a fear that the current actions could lead to a vicious cycle of revenge and tit-for-tat prosecutions in future administrations [11] Evidence & Credibility - The case appears to be a "he said, he said" situation between Comey and McCabe, with McCabe's statements not necessarily contradicting Comey's [13][14] - The inspector general's finding of a lack of candor by Andrew McCabe raises questions about his credibility as a witness [22]

So, Ken Delaneian, what happens from here. Uh, we just said the arraignment will be October 9th, but what happens to James Comey today, this weekend, over the next several days. Where does this case go.We're still reporting this out, Willie. There was some talk last night that Comey was going to surrender for processing at an FBI office in the Eastern District of Virginia today, this morning. Uh we're still trying to figure out whether that's going to happen because it's not necessarily true that he has to ...

DOJ & White House Scandal - The DOJ is facing a crisis of Trump's own making regarding the potential indictment of James Comey, despite career prosecutors finding no evidence to indict him [1][2] - Trump pushed the attorney general to bring charges against Comey, but some allies expressed reservations about the case [3] - Trump denies involvement in pursuing Comey, contradicting his own words and actions [5][6] - Trump was demanding Bondi move faster in indicting opponents [8] Legal & Ethical Concerns - Bringing cases solely based on Trump's personal demands constitutes selective prosecution, which is illegal in America [13] - The pursuit of Leticia James, the New York Attorney General, is also under scrutiny, raising concerns about unlawful revenge [14][16] - The administration is accused of weaponizing the Department of Justice and criminalizing political foes to scare people out of exercising their lawful right to disagree [28] Broader Implications - The situation is compared to a "Banana Republic" with members of the opposition party being indicted [10] - The pursuit of Comey is seen as a continuation of these "Banana Republic indictments" [21] - The current administration's conduct is categorized as unlawful, a shift from the "lawful but awful" behavior of the first Trump administration [23]

President Trump's Justice Department is weighing potential charges against former FBI Director James Comey. >> This is a surprise. >> Three sources familiar with the matter.>> No, it's not cuz Donald Trump ordered his attorney general to do this last week and fired a US attorney because the US attorney couldn't get evidence to go after his political enemies. Three sources familiar with the matter tell MSNBC the department is considering charging the former bureau chief with lying to Congress for his respons ...