NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after a significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Alexandria Real Estate, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/ ...

NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF) and Point Bonita Capital for potential violations of the federal securities laws after SEC probe is revealed. If you invested in Jefferies or Point Bonita, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/jefferies-financial-group-inc-class-action. Why are Jefferies and Point Bonita being Inv ...

NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Synopsys, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNPS) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after a significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Synopsys, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/synopsys-inc-class-action-la ...

NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after a significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Integer, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/integer-holdings- ...

Core Viewpoint - The James Hardie Industries plc is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due to misleading statements regarding its North America Fiber Cement segment performance during a period of inventory destocking [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled "Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc" and is filed in the Northern District of Illinois [1]. - Investors who purchased James Hardie common stock between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025, have until December 23, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that James Hardie executives made false assurances about the strength of the Fiber Cement segment despite early signs of customer destocking [3]. Group 2: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that on August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in sales in the North America Fiber Cement segment due to customer destocking, which was first identified in April and May [4]. - Following the disclosure of the sales decline, James Hardie's stock price dropped by over 34% [4]. Group 3: Company Background - James Hardie designs and manufactures a variety of fiber cement building products, with manufacturing facilities located in both the United States and Australia [2]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm representing the investors, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc for failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, leading to significant financial losses for investors [3][4]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit involves allegations against James Hardie and certain executives for not disclosing critical information that violated federal securities laws during the Class Period from May 20, 2025, to August 18, 2025 [3]. - On August 19, 2025, the company revealed a 12% decline in sales in its North America Fiber Cement segment, attributed to customer destocking, which was first identified in April and May [3]. Financial Impact - Following the disclosure of the sales decline, James Hardie's share price plummeted over 34%, dropping from $28.43 per share on August 18, 2025, to $18.64 per share on August 20, 2025, representing a loss of $9.79 per share [4]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased shares during the Class Period have until December 23, 2025, to file lead plaintiff applications in the ongoing lawsuit [1][2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a securities class action lawsuit against CarMax, Inc. alleging that the company misled investors about its business stability and growth prospects, resulting in significant stock declines [2][4]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that CarMax and its executives concealed critical information regarding the company's operational challenges, leading to two major stock crashes [2][5]. - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as June 20, 2025, to November 5, 2025 [3]. Allegations - The complaint identifies two main issues that allegedly inflated the stock price: - **Unsustainable Demand**: CarMax reported strong growth for Q1 2026 but failed to disclose that this was due to a temporary surge in customer demand driven by anticipated tariffs [4]. - **CarMax Auto Finance Risk**: Management assured investors about the stability of their loan reserves, which later revealed a significant increase in loan loss provisions amounting to $142 million, a 40% sequential increase [4]. Impact on Business - The lawsuit highlights a distortion in core retail demand that could not be maintained in subsequent quarters, leading to a drastic cut in forward guidance and signaling systemic weaknesses in business operations [4]. - The stock experienced a 20% decline following the announcement of disappointing Q2 results, which included a 24% drop in net EPS and the unexpected loan loss provision [4]. Investor Actions - Investors who purchased CarMax securities during the class period and suffered losses are encouraged to contact Hagens Berman to discuss their rights and potential involvement in the lawsuit [5][6].

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - December 16, 2025) - Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. (NYSE: LRN) and certain of the Company's senior executives for securities fraud after significant stock drops resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Stride, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/stride-inc-class-act ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. on behalf of shareholders who purchased securities during the specified class period, alleging securities fraud due to misleading statements and undisclosed adverse facts about the company's performance and prospects [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is based on claims that Sprouts made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial outlook during the class period [4]. - Shareholders have until January 26, 2026, to file a lead plaintiff motion in the ongoing lawsuit [1]. Group 2: Company Performance - On October 29, 2025, Sprouts reported third-quarter results showing a comparable-store sales growth of only 5.9%, which was below the company's prior guidance [3]. - The company revised its full-year guidance for comparable store growth to a range of flat to 2%, citing challenging year-on-year comparisons and signs of a softening consumer [3]. - Following the announcement, Sprouts' stock price dropped by $27.3, or 26.1%, closing at $77.25 per share on October 30, 2025, indicating significant investor losses [3]. Group 3: Allegations Against Defendants - The complaint alleges that the defendants failed to disclose that Sprouts' customer base was not as resilient to macroeconomic conditions as claimed, and that the company was not adequately positioned to handle economic uncertainties [4]. - It is also alleged that the shift in consumer spending dynamics was insufficient to offset sales slowdowns, and that the company's reported sales figures did not reflect a sustainable growth trajectory [4]. - The lawsuit contends that the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [4].

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP announces that investors with losses have opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit against Blue Owl Capital Inc. ("Blue Owl" or the "Company") (NYSE: OWL). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR OWL INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE BEFORE FEBRUARY 2, 2026 (LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE) TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed alleges that, between February 6, 2025 and November 16, 202 ...