PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 24, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National plaintiffs’ law firm Berger Montague PC announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENPH) (“Enphase” or the “Company”) on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Enphase securities during the period from April 22, 2025 through October 28, 2025 (the “Class Period”). Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased Enphase securities during the Class Period may, no later than April 20, 2026, seek ...

BRBR SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: BellRing Brands (BRBR) Facing Securities Class Action Over Alleged Artificial Growth and $2.9 Billion Value Wipeout - Hagens Berman [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationSAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 24, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- National shareholder rights law firm Hagens Berman is issuing an updated notice to investors in BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) regarding the March 23, 2026, lead plaintiff deadline accusing BellRing and certain of BellRing's top executives of securities fraud. [CLI ...

Core Viewpoint - A shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit against Zynex, Inc. for alleged misrepresentations regarding the company's revenue related to a fraudulent overbilling scheme from 2018 to 2023 [4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit represents investors who purchased or acquired Zynex securities between February 25, 2021, and December 15, 2025 [1]. - Defendants are accused of making false statements about the company's financial performance, specifically its reported revenue [4]. Group 2: Legal Process - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file necessary documents by April 21, 2026 [3]. - Participation as a lead plaintiff is not required to share in any potential recovery from the lawsuit [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Bernstein Liebhard LLP, the law firm handling the case, has recovered over $3.5 billion for clients since its inception in 1993 [5]. - The firm has a strong reputation, being named to The National Law Journal's "Plaintiffs' Hot List" thirteen times and recognized in The Legal 500 for sixteen consecutive years [5].

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the merger of CECO Environmental Corp. (NASDAQ: CECO) and Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. Upon completion of the proposed transaction, CECO shareholders are expected to own approximately 62.5% of the combined company. Halper Sadeh encourages CECO shareholders to click here to learn more about their rights and optionsor contact Daniel Sadeh or Zachary Halper free of charge at (212) 763-0060 or sadeh@halpersadeh.com or zh ...

Core Viewpoint - Enphase Energy, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly making false statements and failing to disclose critical information regarding its financial and operational prospects during the specified class period [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc., and it includes purchasers or acquirers of Enphase Energy securities from April 22, 2025, to October 28, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until April 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Enphase Energy overstated its ability to manage channel inventory and mitigate the effects of the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On October 28, 2025, Enphase Energy reported third-quarter financial results, indicating that elevated channel inventory would lead to lower battery storage shipments in the fourth quarter of 2025 [4]. - The expiration of the 25D Credit is expected to negatively impact revenues for the first quarter of 2026 [4]. - Following the announcement, Enphase Energy's stock price fell by more than 15% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Enphase Energy securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [5]. - A lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm to litigate the case [5]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Plug Power Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following significant stock drops attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, captioned Ortolani v. Plug Power Inc., et al., No. 1:26-cv-00165 [3]. - Investors have until April 3, 2026, to request to be appointed to lead the case, with claims asserted under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [3]. Group 2: Company Background - Plug Power specializes in hydrogen fuel cell turnkey solutions for electric mobility and stationary power markets, and develops infrastructure such as hydrogen production plants [4]. - The company announced a "closed a $1.66 billion loan guarantee" from the U.S. Department of Energy to finance the construction of hydrogen production facilities [4]. Group 3: Stock Performance and Events - On October 7, 2025, Plug Power's stock dropped by $0.26 per share (6.3%) following the abrupt departure of its CEO and President [5]. - On November 10, 2025, the company announced the suspension of activities under the DOE loan program, leading to a further stock drop of $0.09 per share (3.4%) [6]. - A report on November 13, 2025, confirmed the suspension of plans to construct hydrogen facilities, resulting in a stock decline of $0.48 per share (17.6%) [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ardent Health, Inc. and its senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is filed by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP on behalf of investors in Ardent Health securities, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [3]. - Investors have until March 9, 2026, to request to be appointed to lead the case, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Ardent Health - The lawsuit alleges that Ardent Health misrepresented its process for determining the collectability of accounts receivable, claiming reliance on "detailed reviews of historical collections" while actually using a "180-day cliff" method [4]. - This misrepresentation allowed Ardent Health to report inflated accounts receivable and delay recognizing losses on uncollectable accounts, constituting a violation of federal securities laws [4]. Group 3: Stock Price Impact - On November 12, 2025, Ardent Health disclosed a $43 million revenue decrease for the quarter and increased its professional liability reserves by $54 million, leading to a stock price drop of $4.75 per share, or over 33%, from $14.05 to $9.30 [5].

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 24, 2026) - Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. (NASDAQ: FRMI), certain of the Company's senior executives and directors, and underwriters of Fermi's Initial Public Offering after a significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Fermi, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://w ...

Core Viewpoint - The Navan class action lawsuit alleges that Navan, Inc. and its executives misled investors regarding the company's financial health and future expenses during its IPO, leading to significant stock price declines after the IPO [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers of Navan, Inc. common stock related to its IPO on October 31, 2025, where nearly 37 million shares were issued at $25.00 per share [1][2]. - The lawsuit claims that the offering documents were materially false or misleading, particularly regarding a 39% increase in sales and marketing expenses shortly after the IPO [3][4]. - Following the earnings report on December 15, 2025, which revealed increased expenses to nearly $95 million, Navan's stock price fell nearly 12% [4]. Group 2: Stock Performance - By the time the lawsuit commenced, Navan's stock price had dropped to as low as $9.20 per share, representing a nearly 63% decline from the IPO price of $25.00 [5]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Navan common stock during the IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [6]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can choose a law firm to litigate the case [6]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [7]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, including the largest securities class action recovery in history [7].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud lawsuit has been filed against Navan, Inc. and certain executives, alleging inadequate disclosure in the company's IPO materials regarding increased sales and marketing spending and slowing revenue trends [2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Navan's IPO offering materials, dated October 31, 2025, failed to disclose significant increases in sales and marketing expenses while the company was experiencing slowing revenue trends necessary to maintain reported growth metrics [2]. - Navan sold approximately 36.9 million shares at $25 per share during the IPO [2]. - Following the disclosure of increased sales and marketing expenses and the departure of the Chief Financial Officer on December 15, 2025, Navan's stock price fell to $12.90 per share the next trading day [2]. Group 2: Eligibility and Actions - Investors who purchased Navan common stock and experienced a decline in share value may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit, regardless of whether they sold their shares [3]. - The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff is April 24, 2026, and a class has not yet been certified [4]. Group 3: Whistleblower Information - Individuals with non-public information about Navan are encouraged to assist in the investigation or file a report with the SEC under the whistleblower program, potentially receiving rewards of up to 30% of any successful recovery [5]. Group 4: Firm Background - Block & Leviton is recognized as a leading securities class action firm, having recovered billions for defrauded investors and representing many top institutional investors [6].