We are covering the late breaking news out of Los Angeles. Late today, the latest development in a clash that seems escalated by the federal government under the Trump administration includes now a small number of US Marines formerly mobilized to respond to this ongoing clash and the protests. Today's protests, and you can see some of the footage, and we've been tracking this, are overwhelmingly peaceful across the city there.The escalation though has little precedent in modern times to see the Guard deploy ...

RT U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA)I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that.This is anarchy and true chaos.My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement. https://t.co/pPYbvP6xR0 ...

Core Insights - Meta is launching a significant overhaul of its fact-checking system, introducing Community Notes for Facebook, Instagram, and Threads in the U.S. starting March 18 [1][2] - The initiative aims to address public perception of bias and improve the accuracy of information on its platforms, moving away from reliance on third-party fact-checkers [8][10] - The new system is inspired by Twitter's Community Notes and seeks to create a more scalable and less error-prone fact-checking process [12][18] Group 1: Community Notes Implementation - Community Notes will allow users to suggest and rate notes that fact-check claims in posts, with the goal of enhancing the reliability of information shared on Meta's platforms [13][17] - The program will initially be tested in the U.S., Meta's most profitable market, before considering expansion to other regions [2][10] - Meta's executives emphasize the importance of getting the system right in the U.S. before rolling it out internationally, particularly in light of regulatory scrutiny in the European Union [2][10] Group 2: Addressing Bias and Misinformation - Meta's VP of Public Policy highlighted past mistakes in fact-checking, including mislabeling opinion articles, which contributed to the decision to develop Community Notes [9][10] - The new system aims to reduce perceived bias and improve the accuracy of fact-checking by requiring consensus among contributors with opposing viewpoints [17][19] - Research indicates that crowdsourced systems like Community Notes can be perceived as more trustworthy than traditional third-party fact-checkers, potentially reducing the spread of misinformation [18][20] Group 3: Challenges and Limitations - Despite the potential benefits, there are concerns about the speed and effectiveness of Community Notes, as they may not intervene quickly enough during the early viral stages of misleading posts [19][20] - A study found that while contributors suggested accurate information 81% of the time, only 9% of posts received consensus for fact-checking, indicating a significant gap in the system's responsiveness [20][21] - The implementation of Community Notes does not replace Meta's existing Community Standards, which govern the classification of hate speech and other prohibited content [10]