Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation and its senior executives for securities fraud following a significant drop in stock price due to alleged violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Integer Holdings Corporation, et al., No. 1:25-cv-10251 [3]. - Investors have until February 9, 2026, to request to be appointed to lead the case [3]. Group 2: Company Performance and Allegations - Integer designs and manufactures cardiac rhythm management and cardiovascular products, including electrophysiology devices [4]. - The company allegedly overstated demand for its EP devices while public assurances contradicted the actual decline in demand and revenue [5]. - On October 23, 2025, Integer lowered its 2025 sales guidance to between $1.840 billion and $1.854 billion, down from a previous range of $1.850 billion to $1.876 billion, which was below analysts' estimates [6]. Group 3: Stock Impact - Following the announcement of lowered sales guidance, Integer's stock price dropped by $35.22 per share, or over 32%, from $109.11 on October 22, 2025, to $73.89 on October 23, 2025 [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. and its senior executives for securities fraud, following significant stock drops attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Stride, Inc. is an education technology company that provides an online platform to students across the U.S. [4]. Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that Stride inflated enrollment numbers by retaining "ghost students," failed to comply with employee background checks and licensure laws, and provided a poor customer experience, leading to higher withdrawal rates and lower conversion rates [4]. - Stride's stock price dropped significantly due to these allegations, falling by $18.60 (over 11%) from $158.36 to $139.76 per share on September 15, 2025, after a fraud complaint was reported [5]. - On October 28, 2025, Stride acknowledged that poor customer experience led to an estimated 10,000-15,000 fewer enrollments, resulting in a further stock price drop of $83.48 (over 54%) from $153.53 to $70.05 per share on October 29, 2025 [6]. Legal Proceedings - Investors have until January 12, 2026, to request to lead the case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, under the case caption MacMahon v. Stride, Inc., et al. [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CarMax, Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, titled Jason Cap v. CarMax, Inc., et al., No. 1:25-cv-03602, with claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [3]. - Investors have until January 2, 2026, to request to be appointed to lead the case [3]. Group 2: Reasons for the Lawsuit - CarMax has been accused of misleading investors regarding the demand for its used cars, which was allegedly inflated by a temporary boost due to U.S. tariffs on cars [4]. - The unexpected departure of CEO Bill Nash on November 6, 2025, is also under investigation to determine if CarMax properly assessed its portfolio of car loans [5]. Group 3: Stock Performance - On September 25, 2025, CarMax reported disappointing financial results, including a 5.4% decline in retail used unit sales and a net income drop from $132.8 million to approximately $95.4 million year-over-year [6]. - Following the financial report, CarMax's stock price fell by $11.45 per share, or about 20%, from $57.05 to $45.60 [7]. - The announcement of CEO Bill Nash's departure and a weak preliminary Q3 2025 outlook led to an additional stock drop of over 24% [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Synopsys, Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop due to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Synopsys, Inc. provides design automation software products used for designing and testing integrated circuits. Its Design IP segment, which supplies pre-designed silicon components to semiconductor companies, has been the fastest-growing segment, increasing from 25% of revenue in 2022 to 31% in 2024 [4]. Allegations and Financial Performance - The lawsuit claims that Synopsys misled investors by stating that customers relied on its IP to minimize integration risk and that the company was experiencing strength in Europe and South Korea. However, it is alleged that customers required more customization for IP components, negatively impacting the economics of the Design IP business [5]. - In Q3 2025, Synopsys reported a revenue of $425.9 million for its Design IP segment, reflecting a 7.7% year-over-year decline, and a net income of $242.5 million, a 43% year-over-year decline. The company indicated that increased customization demands were leading to longer project timelines and resource requirements [6]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the release of disappointing Q3 2025 results, Synopsys' stock price fell from $604.37 per share to $387.78 per share, a decline of nearly 36% in one day [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding its operations and financial performance during the Class Period from October 22, 2024, to October 28, 2025 [1][3]. Company Overview - Stride, Inc. is an education technology company based in Reston, Virginia, providing online learning programs, curricula, and support services to schools and districts across the United States [2]. Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Stride inflated enrollment numbers, reduced staffing below statutory limits, ignored compliance requirements, and concealed enrollment losses during the Class Period [3]. Disclosure of Information - Investors became aware of the issues on September 14, 2025, when a report revealed that a school district had sued Stride for fraud and deceptive trade practices. On October 28, 2025, Stride announced that "poor customer experience" led to increased withdrawal rates and decreased enrollments, resulting in a significant decline in share price [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws related to its September 17, 2025 IPO [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased StubHub securities under the registration statement and prospectus from the IPO [2]. - The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement was materially false and misleading, omitting critical information about changes in vendor payment timing and its adverse impact on free cash flow [3]. - It is claimed that these omissions led to materially misleading reports on the Company's free cash flow and that positive statements made by Defendants regarding the Company's business lacked a reasonable basis [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors wishing to join the class action have until January 23, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [4]. - A copy of the Complaint can be reviewed on the law firm's website [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful in the lawsuit [5]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors in similar cases [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, alleging that the company's registration statement and prospectus related to its merger with Cedar Fair contained misleading information and failed to disclose critical financial issues [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks damages for alleged violations of federal securities laws on behalf of all individuals and entities that held shares of Six Flags common stock related to the merger [2]. - The complaint claims that the registration statement was negligently prepared, containing untrue statements and omitting necessary facts, which misled investors [3]. - Specific allegations include chronic underinvestment in Legacy Six Flags, aggressive cost-cutting measures that degraded operational competence, and undisclosed capital needs that undermined the merger rationale [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who purchased Six Flags shares have until January 5, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the class action [4]. - The law firm representing the investors operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only recover costs if successful [5]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized law firm specializing in securities fraud class actions and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [6]. - The firm emphasizes its commitment to restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the specified class period from January 27, 2025, to October 27, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased Alexandria securities during the class period [2]. - The complaint alleges that the defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts regarding the company's Long Island City property [3]. - Specific allegations include misleading claims about the leasing value of the LIC property and the lack of a reasonable basis for the company's Megacampus™ strategy [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in Alexandria have until January 26, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case [4]. - Participation in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful [5]. - The firm has a history of recovering significant amounts for investors in securities fraud class actions [6].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation on behalf of investors who purchased its common stock during the specified class period from July 25, 2024, to October 22, 2025 [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit is initiated by Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a prominent national shareholder rights law firm [1] - Investors have until February 9, 2026, to file a lead plaintiff motion [1]

Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. on behalf of investors who acquired shares between July 1, 2024, and November 5, 2025, particularly related to the merger with Cedar Fair L.P. [1][3] - The lawsuit claims that the merger registration statement and prospectus did not accurately reflect Six Flags' financial and operational status, highlighting years of underinvestment that left the parks needing significant capital to stay competitive [3] - Following the merger closing on July 1, 2024, Six Flags' stock price dropped from over $55 per share to as low as $20, representing a 64% loss in value [4] Company Overview - Six Flags, headquartered in Arlington, Texas, is a prominent owner and operator of theme and water parks [2] - The law firm Berger Montague PC, which is leading the class action, specializes in complex civil litigation and has a strong track record in recovering significant amounts for clients [5]