Federal district court judges — not the Supreme Court — have been the strongest check on President Trump’s assaults on the Constitution, @NoahRFeldman says (via @opinion) https://t.co/hVqeUQFQrU ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)Only unimaginably lazy or corrupt legislators let lobbyists write bills on topics this important.If Senator Scott and his fellow victims of traitorous, anti-constitutional spying won't use their Constitutional legislative powers to defend the Constitution -- even when they personally are the victims of the anti-constitutional forces! -- then they deserve all the spying they are getting from our extremely anti-constitutional secret police, and more. The more spying the traitors do ...

The reason that these six members of Congress felt that it was appropriate, maybe necessary to briefly remind members of the military that they should not obey illegal orders is because the Trump administration, uh, Secretary Hegsath back in February essentially moved to neuter the legal advice at the Pentagon that commanders depend on. They fired the the top three judge agitant generals who were head the military lawyer group which had the effect of intimidating all of the lawyers in the Pentagon. So there ...

FBI and Justice Department officials are working to arrange interviews with six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a video advising service members not to follow illegal orders. The video enraged President Trump, who posted on social media last Friday that the lawmakers, all of whom have previously served in the military or US intelligence, should be arrested. He also accused them of sedicious behavior punishable by death.The four members of the house who appeared in the video, Jason Crowe, Chris Duzio, M ...

New tonight, exclusive reporting from MS Now. Donald Trump is considering removing one of his most loyal supporters, FBI Director Cash Patel, in the coming months as he and his top aids have grown increasingly frustrated by the unflattering headlines Patel has recently generated. Headlines like this one from MS Now, the Cash Patel's girlfriend received an FBI security detail and a separate report alleging he chartered a government jet for a date night.Laura, um I know that you have some reporting on this. y ...

I want to bring in Leon Petta who served as defense secretary as well as CIA director under former President Barack Obama. It's good to see you again, Mr. . Secretary.Uh there were members uh of the six the group that made this video who said that at least part of the impetus was they were hearing from members of the active military who were telling them they were concerned about actions that they were being asked to take. So, having heard what Rachel just said, I wonder if you think that they could be in a ...

Political Rhetoric and Violence - The analysis suggests that escalating rhetoric, particularly accusations of treason, within the MAGA movement could incite political violence [2] - The report highlights concerns that the President's words have inspired violence in the past [8] Senator Mark Kelly's Profile - The report indicates that attacks on Senator Mark Kelly could inadvertently elevate his national profile, potentially aiding future presidential aspirations [3][4][9] - The analysis mentions that some perceive Kelly as a formidable political opponent [9] Military Conduct and Legality of Orders - The report raises concerns about a potential moment where active duty senior military officials may need to speak out against or disobey questionable or illegal orders [6][7] - The analysis emphasizes the importance of military personnel adhering to the Constitution and refusing to carry out illegal orders, a message amplified by the President [10][11] Trump Administration's Actions - The report suggests the Trump administration's actions are reminiscent of the chaos of the first term [10] - The analysis points out the possibility of Trump asserting the authority to deploy the military into any American city [5]

Let's read more from Judge Curry's ruling um from about the appointments clause today. The appointments clause is more than a matter of etiquette or protocol. It is among the significant structural safeguards of the constitutional scheme.The clause not only serves as a bull work against one branch a grandizing its power at the expense of another but also preserves another aspect of the constitution's structural integrity by preventing the diffusion of the appointment power. Translate that for me. >> Oh boy. ...

Today, Defense Secretary Pete Hegath, who has presided over a series of deadly military strikes in the Caribbean of highly questionable legality, announced that the Pentagon will initiate an investigation into Senator Mark Kelly, one of six Democrats who participated in a video simply reminding active duty service members of their duty to refuse illegal orders. In a statement posted on social media, the Pentagon cited the uniform code of military justice and federal law prohibiting actions quote intended to ...

Military Justice and Political Implications - The discussion revolves around whether Senator Kelly can be court-martialed for posting a video referencing military law [1][2] - The core issue is whether Senator Kelly's actions, and those of other lawmakers, interfered with military loyalty or good order and discipline [2][3] - The legality of orders is central, with some arguing that defying illegal orders is permissible or even required [3] Administration's Response and Potential Abuse of Power - Concerns are raised about the administration using investigations to punish perceived adversaries [4] - The power to recall retirees to active duty for court-martial is highlighted as a significant threat, regardless of the merit of allegations [5][6] - The administration's willingness to use this power is seen as a potential abuse [6] Political Context and Reactions - Senator Kelly's reaction to the president's criticism is noted, emphasizing the increased threats resulting from his words [7][8] - The heightened threat environment in politics, especially when the president directs anger towards individuals, is acknowledged [9] - The situation is compared to a dictator's playbook, targeting perceived enemies [10] - The actions of Senator Kelly and others are defended as simply quoting the code of military justice to protect military personnel [11] - The discussion suggests the president's actions are an attempt to bully and intimidate, similar to his treatment of reporters [12][13] - The importance of upholding the Constitution, to which all officials and military personnel swear loyalty, is emphasized [14]