Legislative Procedure - The current Senate rule requiring 60 votes to end debate (cloture) is being challenged [2] - Passing a bill only requires a simple majority vote if no one is speaking [2] - Achieving cloture is the mechanism that requires 60 votes to bring debate to a close, not passing a bill [2] Constitutional Concerns - The "zombie filibuster" is considered a violation of the Constitution [2] Call to Action - There is a call to end the "zombie filibuster" [1][2]

Core Argument - The rule of law, encompassing principles like equality before the law and judicial independence, is crucial for a country's prosperity and institutional growth [5][14] - The document contrasts the "rule of law" with "rule by law," where law is used as a tool for power consolidation, highlighting the dangers of the latter [8][10] - The author emphasizes the importance of constitutional awareness and civic duties, especially among young people, to ensure government accountability and prevent crises [12][13] Pakistan's Context - Pakistan's constitution, particularly the 1973 version, inherently includes the rule of law, yet the country has faced constitutional crises and instances of "rule by law" [6][7] - The Objectives Resolution of 1947-1949 emphasized Pakistan as an Islamic republic with republican democracy, protection of minority rights, and guaranteed judicial independence [6] - Erosion of judicial independence, such as parliamentary selection of top judges, undermines the separation of powers and the rule of law in Pakistan [8][9] Global Implications - The American system of checks and balances and separation of powers serves as a model for constitutions worldwide [3][5] - Countries that disregard the rule of law face a bleak future, as exemplified by recent examples in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh [10] - The youth, informed by social media, play a vital role in upholding the rule of law and holding governments accountable [11][12]

RT Cold Hard Sats (@coldhardsats)@NickSzabo4 @ParvizMalakouti Exactly. America is its people. There is nothing magical about the soil here that when you step foot on it, you become American. And neither does saying you believe in the constitution. Proclaiming the constitution is like a day rain dance for modern day "conservatives." ...

Executive Orders & Legal Framework - Executive orders are written orders from the President, aiming to implement specific actions [2] - Executive orders are not laws and are subordinate to the Constitution and federal statutes [2][3] - The legality and constitutionality of executive orders are ultimately determined by the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court [3] - Congress can also act if it has the political will to do so [3] Potential Impact & Concerns - The report highlights concerns about the extent to which President Trump has used executive orders to reshape government and society [1] - Trump's executive orders have targeted areas such as law firms doing business with the government, the Department of Education, and requirements to vote in political elections [1] - One executive order challenged a common understanding of the Constitution to end birthright citizenship [1]

Legal Analysis of Birthright Citizenship Case - The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the birthright citizenship case on its merits [1] - The case involves challenges to the Trump administration's attempt to eradicate birthright citizenship [4] - The administration argues that the Wong Kim Ark case only extends citizenship to children of parents with permanent domicile in the US [6] - The administration's interpretation focuses on the word "domicile" used extensively in the Wong Kim Ark case [7] Leticia James Case and Grand Jury Dynamics - A federal grand jury has denied the second attempt to indict Leticia James [7] - The Justice Department could attempt to indict her again, with each charge carrying a 10-year statute of limitations [8][10] - "No bill" decisions by grand juries are statistically rare, occurring in the "one to 10" number range annually out of over 150,000 cases [12] - Federal prosecutors rarely experience a "no true bill" [12]

joining us on that breaking news. And joining us now is Democratic Senator from New Jersey, Corey Booker. So much to discuss, but let's start on this breaking news.As we just reported, several of your Senate colleagues are today asking for an update from A. G. Bondi on the release of the Epstein files based on the law that passed.What have you heard about the efforts to get the full files. Does it look like the DOJ is complying with that law. Well, they're not complying with their commitments they made for ...

Legal & Ethical Obligations - Individuals swear an oath to protect and defend the constitution [1] - There should be consequences for abject war crimes [1] - Laws are clear: one can refuse illegal orders [1] - No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or the constitution [1] - The military won't follow unlawful orders from their commander-in-chief [2] Standards & Beliefs - There's a standard and ethos that we are above what enemies would do [2] - Vigilance is critical, whether serving in the CIA, Army, Navy, or Air Force [2] Historical Context - In 2016, Pete Hexith stated that one doesn't have to follow the order of the commander-in-chief [3]

Welcome back. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are demanding answers as backlash grows over the Trump administration's controversial strikes on alleged drug boats. MS Now has learned that Navy Admiral Frank M.Bradley will be on Capitol Hill this week to speak with members about the operations. The White House and Defense Secretary Pete Hegath now say it was Bradley who ordered a second strike to kill survivors from an initial strike back on September 2nd. And joining us now, Democratic Congressman Jason Crowe of C ...

Let me ask you about the other big story this week. You joined uh five other Democratic lawmakers in a video urging service members to disobey orders they believe are illegal. We're seeing some of that video play, Senator, right now.In response, the Pentagon has opened an investigation into military laws. It says that you may have violated the FBI is reportedly launching its own probe. Now, Defense Secretary Pete Hegsith has personally threatened to recall you uh to active duty so that you can be court mars ...

This week, we learned that the FBI has opened an inquiry into six Democratic lawmakers whom Donald Trump accused of sedicious behavior punishable by death. Their alleged defense was releasing a short video reminding members of the military that they must follow lawful orders and refuse unlawful ones. In a statement Tuesday, four House members said the FBI contacted the House and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms to arrange interviews with the lawmakers.Meanwhile, the Pentagon announced Monday that it's reviewing misc ...