What would happen if Trump decided to fire the Fed chair Jerome Powell. Yesterday's media circus really ignited a lot of questions on just the technicalities of removing the current Fed chair. One of the big questions would be whether Jerome Powell would actually take the dismissal serious or would he try to show up to work the next day only to find Trump preventing him from entering the office.If he does decide to stay at home, who takes his place. Would it be vice chair uh Jefferson stepping in or would w ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - ARMOUR's Q2 GAAP net loss related to common stockholders was $78.6 million, or $0.94 per common share [4] - Net interest income was $33.1 million, while distributable earnings available to common stockholders were $64.9 million, or $0.77 per common share [4] - The quarter ending book value was $16.9 per common share, with an estimated book value of $16.81 as of July 21 [6] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - ARMOUR raised approximately $104.6 million of capital by issuing about 6.3 million shares of common stock through an at-the-market offering program during Q2 [4] - Since June 30, an additional $58.8 million was raised by issuing approximately 3.5 million shares [5] - Monthly common stock dividends were paid at $0.24 per share, totaling $0.72 for the quarter [5] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The 30-year fixed mortgage rate was near 6.75% through late June and early July, dampening refinancing activity [10] - MBS to SOFR spreads widened by approximately 10 basis points quarter over quarter, remaining historically cheap [9] Company Strategy and Development Direction - ARMOUR's strategy focuses on growing and deploying capital thoughtfully during spread dislocations while maintaining robust liquidity and dynamically adjusting hedges for disciplined risk management [17] - The company is optimistic about structural demand for MBS improving later in the year due to evolving regulatory clarity and a potential resumption of Fed easing policy [15] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that the macro landscape is influenced by U.S. fiscal sustainability, Fed independence, and trade dynamics, which are expected to weigh on the market for some time [8] - The company believes that a resumption of the Fed cutting cycle this year could reignite liquidity flow into agency MBS [9] Other Important Information - ARMOUR's estimated net portfolio duration is closely managed at 0.46 years, with implied leverage at eight turns [12] - The MBS portfolio remains concentrated in production MBS with ROEs in the 18% to 20% range [13] Q&A Session Summary Question: Managing spread duration risk during volatility - Management expressed comfort with current leverage levels and noted that spreads remain historically attractive, indicating a potential for modestly increasing leverage [20][21] Question: Allocation to higher coupons and best value in the coupon stack - Management remains favorable towards 5.56 coupons, which are currently modeling the highest ROE, while the allocation to higher coupons has declined due to volatility [25][26] Question: Role of long treasury position within the portfolio - The five-year treasury position is used as part of the hedging strategy and as a proxy for Agency CMBS positions, allowing for tactical adjustments based on spread conditions [28][29] Question: Total expenses after fees waived - Management indicated that the higher expenses were due to increased professional fees and do not expect the same run rate going forward [33] Question: Balancing total return versus carry in the hedge portfolio - Management stated that they are positioned for a bullish steepener and are dynamically adjusting hedges based on macroeconomic views [37][38] Question: Expectations for leverage increase - Management noted that they are comfortable modestly increasing leverage given stable liquidity conditions and attractive spreads, while remaining cautious about making large bets [48][52]

There are three categories of issues that should be distinguished when we talk about Fed independence. The first is monetary policy setting the interest rate, deciding how much fuel's going to be given to the economy versus restraint for inflation. History teaches that the Fed should be autonomous and independent there, and that when the political process gets in their way, the result is more inflation, less economic stability and ultimately higher interest rates.That lesson is clear and needs to be insiste ...

Market Catalyst anchor Julie Hyman breaks down the latest financial news for July 22, 2025. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent commented that he does not see a reason for Fed Chair Powell to step down. However, Queens College Cambridge President Mohamed El-Erian said that Powell should step down to "safeguard the Fed's operational autonomy." Wall Street Journal chief economics commentator Greg Ip and Yahoo Finance contributor & StoneX Senior Adviser Jon Hilsenrath discuss the mounting pressure on Fed Chair ...

Dollar Strength and Trade - Markets initially worried about an unnatural correlation between the dollar and risk, particularly after "Liberation Day" [1] - The US has experienced less growth impact from tariffs than initially feared because countries have not retaliated as much as expected [2] - Small, open, export-oriented economies are expected to be most pressured by tariffs [2] - Tariffs are now seen as more positive for the dollar than previously [3] US Economic Outlook - The dollar experienced front-loaded weakness in the first half of the year, which is unlikely to continue [3] - There was an asymmetric reaction function where bad news was very bad for the dollar, but good news wasn't as good [4] - Deficit expansion isn't as bad as initially feared, and Section 899 has been removed, potentially removing a premium priced into the dollar [5] - US administration policies are hoped to be growth-positive, which would be more positive for the dollar [14] Fed Policy and Dollar Impact - The market is pricing in a premium related to the potential removal of Fed Chair Powell [6] - Removing Powell is unambiguously dollar negative, as it implies a commitment to devalue the dollar by 2% per year [7] - The market is aware that even if Powell is removed, the other Fed governors may not follow suit if the data doesn't support it [8] Euro and Global Growth - There is no good alternative to the dollar, as Europe lacks a strong growth story [10] - Optimism priced into fiscal policy has largely disappeared, and tariffs are expected to have a more negative impact on growth than fiscal stimulus in 2026 [10] - Euro dollar is capped at 120, but flows haven't broadly moved away from the US [11] - Inflation divergence is expected between the US and Europe, with the US experiencing a price level adjustment from tariffs, tighter immigration, and the dollar decline in the first half [16]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The discussion primarily revolves around the Federal Reserve (Fed) and its leadership, particularly focusing on Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the implications of potential political influences on monetary policy. Core Points and Arguments 1. **Presidential Influence on Fed Leadership** The president's remarks about potentially removing Fed Chair Powell raise questions about the nature of such a removal, whether it would be "at will" or "for cause" [1][10][15]. 2. **Supreme Court's Role** The Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Wilcox may protect Fed governors from being removed at will, indicating a unique status for the Fed compared to other federal agencies [1][11]. 3. **Structure of the Federal Reserve** The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) consists of twelve members, including seven governors nominated by the president, which limits the president's ability to influence monetary policy directly [2][8]. 4. **Terms of Governors** Governors serve a 14-year term, with the possibility of reappointment, which means the president has limited opportunities to influence the Board's composition during their term [2][6]. 5. **Historical Context of Leadership Roles** The powers of the Chair and Vice Chair are not significantly greater than those of regular governors, but they historically receive considerable deference from other committee members [3][14]. 6. **Potential Legal Challenges** If the administration attempts to remove Powell "for cause," it could lead to a lengthy legal process, which may negatively impact market perceptions [15][17]. 7. **Impact of Political Interference** Analysts believe that reducing the Fed's independence could lead to higher inflation risks and increased long-term interest rates, adversely affecting economic activity [16][17]. 8. **Historical Precedents** The historical record suggests that political interference has previously led to poor monetary policy outcomes, particularly in the late 1960s and early 1970s [16]. Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content 1. **Demotion of Leadership Roles** There is uncertainty regarding whether the administration can demote a governor from their leadership position, as the Federal Reserve Act does not explicitly provide "for cause" protection for these roles [12][14]. 2. **Recertification of Regional Reserve Bank Presidents** The presidents of the regional Reserve Banks are recertified every five years, which is typically a formality, but could be influenced by the current administration [7]. 3. **Public Perception and Communication** The president's public remarks on monetary policy can influence perceptions, although historically, Fed actions are dictated more by economic conditions than by presidential influence [9]. 4. **Long-term Economic Implications** Any reduction in the Fed's independence could lead to market participants demanding greater compensation for inflation risks, which could further complicate the economic outlook [17].

This week, Donald Trump's fight with Jerome Powell continued, with a White House official first telling Bloomberg News that the president was preparing to fire the Federal Reserve chairman, and then Trump quickly taking the threat back.Executive director of The Budget Lab at Yale @marthagimbel tells @svaneksmith and @chafkin why lawmakers have historically committed to Fed independence https://t.co/qSwm0RcP17 ...

I'm now find executive editor Brian Todd taking a look at a live shot of the opening bells on Wall Street on this Thursday morning. An extra special I would say guests ringing the bell at the New York Stock Exchange. That is Disney CEO Bob Iger.Uh also I see I see Mickey. I see many very important guests there getting trading underway down there. They're at the Disneyland Resort in Anon, California in celebration of Disneyland's 70th anniversary.NYC President Lin Martin also there in attend. You can see her ...

Well, I think let's back up and talk about principles. As you think about across time, the the the Fed was set up to be independent and have a dual mandate, unemployment, price stability, i.e. inflation. And their job is to manage you add their management economy through short-term interest rate adjustments to accomplish that outcome.And I think a stable central bank is a is really very important and very important in the United States because of this size economy with 30 trillion dollars plus of debt out t ...

President Trump says it's highly unlikely he will fire Fed Chairman Pal. But if the president in fact did want to remove Pal from his position, uh what would the process uh look like. Joining us with more on that, Jonathan Caner, former assistant attorney general in the Biden administration.He's also a CNBC uh contributor and our senior economics reporter uh Steve Leeman. I I would uh Jonathan I would say well he said he's not going to do it but um about a month or two ago there was some conjecture and he s ...