3 Ethereum's 👇🧬 EVM (the tech)👥 L1 & some L2s (the business)🔷 ETH (the equity*)* The most liquid public equities are also used as (i) currencies and (ii) savings or store of value instruments. https://t.co/pjyVfwM6MZ ...

While @Ethereum dominates RWAs overall, @ZKsync is emerging as the top L2 driving Ethereum’s RWA growth, holding 15% of the market share and averaging $2.4B RWA value last month.Let’s dive into the numbers: 🧵 https://t.co/UvagUvmdlw ...

RT Brother Lyskey (@0xLyskey)Since Eli’s post in February…1️⃣ DecentralizationDecentralization is moving in the right direction and things are accelerating:- From 160M STRK staked → 465M- Staking v2 went live, introducing Validator Block Attestation; turning validators from passive participants into active contributors- SW and SNF started and executed their first two delegation programs; delegating STRK to the community- Starknet became a Stage 1 Rollup on L2Beat- Starknet also became the first Rollup to mi ...

RT Token Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal)There are many L1s & L2s, but only three that host over $30 billion in user assets on their platform.1) @ethereum ~$330 billion2) @trondao ~$82 billion3) @solana ~$34 billion https://t.co/v9inSj8yJ1 ...

There are many L1s & L2s, but only three that host over $30 billion in user assets on their platform.1) @ethereum ~$330 billion2) @trondao ~$82 billion3) @solana ~$34 billion https://t.co/v9inSj8yJ1 ...

RT Olivier (@ODesenfans)@Austin_Federa @megaeth_labs Starknet just took a meaningful step in the right direction here, and honestly if Stripe/Paradigm can build a high-performance EVM L1 they certainly can build an L2 with a decentralized sequencer set.I don’t think the tech is the issue here. ...

Good question.My take on this is centered around the core idea of a blockchain being purpose-built vs. "general purpose" in nature.With Plasma as an example, the chain has:- gas-free usdt transfers- specific consensus mechanism for anti-spam- uses bitcoin for security rather than ethereumThese are small things from the outside, but when you get lower level in the stack you realize they are mega differentiators.Tempo has opt-in privacy, stablecoin gas fees, a better UX meant for payments.These things matter. ...

payments chainsI am not an expert on payments, but I have worked in 3/5 of the big banks in Canada, as well as several fintechs building payments rails and moving a lot of money with code — and most recently on high-perf chainswhich is to say I have some opinions on the concept of a high-perf chain for paymentsthis will be a long post so I suggest clicking the grok button on the top rightfirst, how can a blockchain have a payments focus in the first place?in the past, there have been several approachesone i ...

RT Matt Huang (@matthuang)On Tempo, permissionlessness, L1 vs L2Tempo will be a permissionless chain. On day 1, anyone will be able to deploy a token, and anyone will be able to transact on the chain. Some projects think that attracting real-world usage and serious institutions requires giving up on base layer neutrality. We do not think that, and that's not how we're building Tempo.The plan for Tempo is to have permissionless validation and permissionless smart contract deployment as well as permissionless ...

JUST IN:According to Matt Huang, Tempo chose to build a L1 instead of an Ethereum L2 because they think a "decentralized validator set is a necessary requirement for partners" to ensure credible neutrality.No mention of other economic reasons, or talk of a new token.Very, very interesting...Matt Huang (@matthuang):On Tempo, permissionlessness, L1 vs L2Tempo will be a permissionless chain. On day 1, anyone will be able to deploy a token, and anyone will be able to transact on the chain. Some projects think t ...