Our podcast on science and technology. The first episode of our four-part series on the past, present and future of nuclear weapons https://t.co/qkjPF2Bi0L ...

Geopolitical Landscape - The debate centers on the potential for war between Iran and Israel, following a declared ceasefire [1] - Discussion includes the implications of Iran's nuclear program and the possibility of nuclear proliferation in the future [1] - US foreign policy and military interventionism are criticized [1] Key Players & Perspectives - Scott Horton, representing a libertarian perspective, critiques US interventionist policies [1] - Mark Dubowitz, from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), provides expertise on Iran and its nuclear program [1] - The debate explores differing viewpoints on Iran, its nuclear ambitions, and the appropriate response [1] Nuclear Program & International Agreements - Iran's nuclear program is a central point of contention, including discussions about uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons [1] - The debate touches upon the Iran nuclear deal and its effectiveness [1] - The Iran Nuclear Archive is referenced [1] Future Scenarios - The discussion includes best-case and worst-case near-term future scenarios regarding Iran [1] - The possibility of a US attack on Iran, referred to as "Operation Midnight Hammer," is considered [1] - The potential for nuclear proliferation in the future is a concern [1]

Initial Impact Assessment - Defense Intelligence Agency's initial assessment indicates US strikes degraded Iranian nuclear facilities but did not destroy them, potentially setting back the program by a few months [2] - The Trump administration disputes this assessment [2][3] - It's difficult to fully assess the damage due to site inaccessibility [6] Program Status and Future Prospects - The Iranian nuclear program's ability to reconstitute and continue uranium enrichment is uncertain [9] - The IAEA is focused on assessing the preservation of nuclear material and the potential for capability reconstitution [7] - Iran denies working towards nuclear weapons capability [9] Strategic Objectives - Israel and the Trump administration aimed to eliminate Iran's uranium enrichment capability [8] - The Trump administration claims the Iranian nuclear program has been set back decades and Iran will no longer enrich uranium [4]

Thanks for being here. On Bloomberg TV and radio, Congressman. Thanks for having me. And thanks for the lead in.You know, one after another of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle forgetting about everyone from Truman to through Biden. Every one of them did a kinetic firing. None of them went to war. None of them came to Congress for the constitutional approval.And that's the only thing the Constitution says is going to war. The fact is, since Teddy Roosevelt famously said that, you can, you know, I ...

If uh Iran is committed to becoming a nuclear weapons power, I do think it puts the regime at risk. I really do. I think it would be the end of the regime if they tried to do that.It's a very simple decision. If what they want is nuclear reactors so they can have electricity. There are so many in the c so many other countries in the world that do that and they don't have to enrich their own uranium, they can do that.But if what they want is a secret program buried in a mountain where no one can see it and i ...

Military Operation Overview - US Central Command executed a strike against three Iranian nuclear facilities, a high-risk mission demonstrating exceptional skill [1] - The operation, named Midnight Hammer, aimed to severely degrade Iran's nuclear weapons infrastructure [2][7] - The mission involved multiple domains and theaters, showcasing global power projection [3] Strategic Execution - A large B-2 strike package launched from the continental US, employing decoy tactics to maintain surprise [4] - The main strike package consisted of seven B-2 bombers, requiring multiple in-flight refuelings during the 18-hour flight [4][5] - A US submarine launched over two dozen Tomahawk Land Cruiser missiles against key infrastructure targets at Esfahan at approximately 5:00 PM EST [6] - Fourth and fifth-generation aircraft swept ahead of the strike package to counter enemy fighters and surface-to-air missile threats [7] Tactical Details and Impact - At approximately 6:40 PM EST, the lead B-2 dropped two Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) weapons on Fordo, with a total of 14 MOPs dropped against two target areas [8] - All three Iranian nuclear infrastructure targets were struck between 6:40 PM and 7:45 PM EST, with Tomahawk missiles striking Isfahan last to maintain surprise [8][9] - Iranian fighters did not engage, and missile systems apparently did not detect the US strike package [9]

Israel has carried out unprecedented strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military leadership. Where things go next could reshape the region. For years, people have speculated that Israel could strike Iran's nuclear facilities.But the scope and scale of these attacks, which also killed the head of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, shows a broader intent to weaken the regime. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had no choice but to act preemptively, warning Iran was close to dev ...

- [Narrator] This is a GBU-57, known as a Massive Ordnance Penetrator. At 20 feet long and weighing 30,000 pounds, it is the world's largest non-nuclear bomb and can destroy targets buried deep underground, earning it the name "Bunker Buster". to destroy Iran's heavily fortified nuclear facilities, experts say these are the conventional weapons with the best chance of success.- This is a big sucker. It is called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which basically sums up what it is. - [Narrator] Here's why the ...

some of these uh some of these uh missions we've been seeing here on our screen. What do you know. Hi, Christina.Yes, that's right. We can now confirm according to three US officials that the US has been helping in shooting down these Iranian missiles and projectiles that have been targeting Israel today. Now, that's notable for a couple of reasons.We know that in the past, this is something that the US has done. For instance, the Biden administration had a similar posture back when this was taking place in ...

VEHICLES, WHICH WERE ACTIVATED AS THE ATTACK BEGAN TO HIT IRANIAN AIR DEFENSES. I WANT TO BRING IN PAUL RIECKHOFF, AN INDEPENDENT NATIONAL SECURITY ANALYST AND AN IRAQ WAR VETERAN, RETIRED ARMY LIEUTENANT GENERAL WHO SERVED AS DEPUTY COMMANDER OF U.S. EUROPEAN COMMAND AND IS AN MSNBC MILITARY ANALYST AND FORMER SPOKESPERSON FOR THE U.S. MISSION TO THE UN, AND FORMER NSC DIRECTOR FOR SYRIA AND LEBANON, JOINS ME IN STUDIO. PAUL, I'LL START WITH YOU.WHAT CAN YOU TELL US ABOUT WHAT IT TAKES TO PULL SOMETHING LI ...