BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased Ramaco Resources, Inc. ("Ramaco†or the "Company†) (NASDAQ: METC) securities between July 31, 2025 and October 23, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period†). Ramaco investors have until March 31, 2026 to file a lead plaintiff motion. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made m ...

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania--(Newsfile Corp. - February 2, 2026) - National plaintiffs' law firm Berger Montague PC announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (NASDAQ: SLM) ("Sallie Mae" or the "Company") on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Sallie Mae securities during the period of July 25, 2025 through August 14, 2025 (the "Class Period"), inclusive.Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased Sallie Mae securities during the Class Pe ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Coupang, Inc. for alleged misleading statements regarding its cybersecurity, which resulted in significant investor losses during the specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who acquired Coupang securities from May 7, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until February 17, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. - The complaint claims that inadequate cybersecurity allowed a former employee to access sensitive customer information undetected for nearly six months [3]. Group 2: Company Impact - Following the cyber event, Coupang's CEO resigned, indicating a significant impact on company leadership and investor confidence [3]. - The lawsuit highlights the potential financial repercussions for Coupang, as investors reportedly suffered significant losses due to the alleged cybersecurity failures [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Berger Montague, the law firm representing the plaintiffs, is noted for its expertise in complex civil litigation and has recovered over $50 billion for clients over its 55-year history [4]. - The firm has a strong track record in various legal areas, including securities, which is relevant to the current lawsuit against Coupang [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. and its executives due to significant stock price drops linked to alleged violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Fermi Inc. is an energy and AI infrastructure company focused on building large-scale nuclear reactors to support grid-independent data centers for AI workloads [4]. - The company's flagship project is Project Matador, designed to provide dedicated power for AI operations [4]. IPO and Allegations - Fermi completed its IPO in October 2025, claiming strong demand for Project Matador and securing a 20-year lease with an investment-grade tenant [5]. - Allegations suggest that Fermi overstated tenant demand and misrepresented the agreement with the First Tenant [6]. Stock Performance - Following the announcement of the First Tenant's termination of the construction funding agreement on December 11, 2025, Fermi's stock dropped by $5.16, or over 33%, from $15.25 to $10.09 per share [7].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Blue Owl Capital Inc. securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, of the lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by February 2, 2026 [2]. - Investors can join the class action by submitting a form or contacting the law firm for more information [5]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3]. - The firm has been ranked highly for its number of securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 [3]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen has received recognition as a leading figure in the plaintiffs' bar [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Blue Owl made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant issues, including pressure on its asset base from BDC redemptions and undisclosed liquidity issues [4]. - It is claimed that Blue Owl was likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs, and the defendants downplayed the severity of these issues, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's business and prospects [4]. - Investors reportedly suffered damages when the true details became known [4].

Core Viewpoint - PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws related to its mortgage recapture efforts as interest rates declined [1][2][3]. Group 1: Investigation Details - Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP is leading the investigation into PennyMac for possibly misrepresenting its ability to recapture customers refinancing their mortgages [3]. - The investigation is prompted by concerns that PennyMac's claims about improving recapture rates may not align with actual performance [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - On January 29, 2026, PennyMac reported disappointing financial results for Q4 2025, which included revelations about increased competition in the mortgage origination market [4]. - Despite increasing its origination capacity, PennyMac faced challenges in capitalizing on refinance opportunities due to competitors also expanding their capacities, leading to a stock price drop of over 37% from $140.70 to as low as $93.50 per share [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Fermi Inc. class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding its Project Matador campus, leading to significant financial losses for investors following the termination of a key funding agreement [3][4][5]. Company Overview - Fermi Inc. is positioned as an energy and AI infrastructure company, having conducted its initial public offering (IPO) in October 2025, selling 37,375,000 shares at a price of $21.00 per share [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that Fermi overstated tenant demand for its Project Matador campus and failed to disclose reliance on a single tenant's funding commitment, which posed a risk of termination [3]. - On December 12, 2025, Fermi announced that the first tenant for Project Matador had terminated a $150 million funding agreement, resulting in a nearly 34% drop in stock price [4]. - By the time the lawsuit commenced, Fermi's stock price had fallen to as low as $8.59 per share, marking a 59% decline from the IPO price [5]. Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows investors who purchased Fermi common stock during the IPO or the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [6]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [6]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7]. - The firm has a strong track record, being ranked 1 in monetary relief for investors in securities class actions for four out of the last five years [7].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. and its executives due to significant stock price drops linked to alleged violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Fermi Inc. is an energy and AI infrastructure company aiming to build large-scale nuclear reactors to support grid-independent data centers for AI companies [4]. - The company's flagship project is Project Matador, designed to provide dedicated power for AI workloads [4]. IPO and Allegations - Fermi completed its IPO in October 2025, claiming strong demand for Project Matador and securing a 20-year lease with an investment-grade-rated tenant [5]. - Allegations suggest that Fermi overstated tenant demand and misrepresented the agreement with the First Tenant [6]. Stock Price Impact - On December 12, 2025, Fermi's stock dropped by $5.16 per share, over 33%, following the termination of the Advance in Aid of Construction Agreement by the First Tenant [7].

Core Viewpoint - PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is under investigation for potential violations of federal securities laws related to its mortgage recapture efforts as interest rates declined [1][2][3]. Group 1: Investigation Details - Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP is investigating whether PennyMac misrepresented its ability to recapture customers refinancing their mortgages during a period of declining interest rates [3]. - The investigation follows PennyMac's claims of improving recapture rates, which may not align with actual performance [2][3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Impact - On January 29, 2026, PennyMac reported disappointing financial results for Q4 2025, revealing that increased origination capacity did not translate into expected refinancing opportunities due to heightened competition [4]. - Following the earnings call, PennyMac's stock price dropped over 37%, from $140.70 per share to as low as $93.50 per share [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ramaco Resources, Inc. for alleged securities fraud, claiming that the company misled investors about its mining operations at the Brook Mine [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, specifically under the case caption Henning v. Ramaco Resources, Inc. [1] - Investors have a 60-day window from the notice to move the court to serve as lead plaintiff in the action [2]. Group 2: Allegations and Impact - Wolfpack Research published a report on October 23, 2025, alleging that Ramaco's Brook Mine was not operational as claimed, describing it as a "hoax" and a "Potemkin Mine" [3] - Following the report, Ramaco's stock price dropped by $3.81, or 9.6%, closing at $36.01 per share on October 23, 2025, with unusually high trading volume [3]. - The complaint alleges that the company made materially false statements and failed to disclose significant facts about its mining activities, including that no significant mining had commenced at the Brook Mine [4].