Core Viewpoint - The comparison between Envista (NVST) and Abbott (ABT) indicates that NVST may offer better value for investors based on various financial metrics and rankings [1][3]. Valuation Metrics - Envista has a forward P/E ratio of 18.81, while Abbott's forward P/E is significantly higher at 26.65 [5]. - The PEG ratio for Envista is 1.23, indicating a more favorable valuation in relation to its expected earnings growth compared to Abbott's PEG ratio of 2.61 [5]. - Envista's P/B ratio stands at 1.08, contrasting with Abbott's P/B ratio of 4.87, further suggesting that Envista is undervalued relative to its book value [6]. Zacks Rank and Style Scores - Envista holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while Abbott has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - In the Value category, Envista receives a grade of B, whereas Abbott is graded C, highlighting Envista's stronger position for value investors [6].

Group 1 - Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), while Carlyle Group (CG) has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating a stronger earnings outlook for AMG [3][7] - AMG has a forward P/E ratio of 8.24, significantly lower than CG's forward P/E of 12.11, suggesting that AMG may be undervalued [5] - AMG's PEG ratio is 0.64, compared to CG's PEG ratio of 1.06, further indicating AMG's potential for better value [5][6] Group 2 - AMG has a P/B ratio of 1.33, while CG has a P/B ratio of 2.78, reinforcing the notion that AMG is more undervalued [6] - Based on various valuation metrics, AMG holds a Value grade of A, whereas CG has a Value grade of C, highlighting AMG's superior value proposition [6] - AMG's improving earnings outlook makes it a more attractive option for value investors compared to CG [7]

Core Insights - The article compares two financial transaction services companies, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) and DLocal (DLO), to determine which is the better undervalued stock option for investors [1] Valuation Metrics - PAGS has a forward P/E ratio of 7.65, significantly lower than DLO's forward P/E of 17.66, indicating that PAGS may be undervalued [5] - The PEG ratio for PAGS is 0.68, while DLO's PEG ratio is 1.05, suggesting that PAGS has a better growth outlook relative to its price [5] - PAGS has a P/B ratio of 1.25 compared to DLO's P/B of 5.75, further indicating that PAGS is more attractively valued based on its book value [6] Investment Ratings - PAGS currently holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), while DLO has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting a stronger earnings outlook for PAGS [3] - Based on the valuation metrics and earnings outlook, PAGS is rated with a Value grade of A, whereas DLO has a Value grade of C, reinforcing PAGS as the superior value option [6]

Investors interested in stocks from the Utility - Electric Power sector have probably already heard of Portland General Electric (POR) and Pinnacle West (PNW) . But which of these two stocks presents investors with the better value opportunity right now? Let's take a closer look.We have found that the best way to discover great value opportunities is to pair a strong Zacks Rank with a great grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system. The proven Zacks Rank emphasizes companies with positive estim ...

Core Viewpoint - Both Annaly Capital Management (NLY) and Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) are mortgage real estate investment trusts (mREITs) with different portfolio strategies and risk profiles, leading to a comparison of their investment opportunities for investors [1] Group 1: Annaly Capital Management (NLY) - NLY's investment strategy focuses on prudent asset selection and effective capital allocation, including traditional Agency MBSs for downside protection and non-agency assets for enhanced returns [2] - As of March 31, 2025, NLY's investment portfolio totaled $84.9 billion, benefiting from a low prepayment environment through a scaled mortgage servicing rights (MSR) platform [3] - The decline in mortgage rates is expected to improve NLY's book value and net interest spread, enhancing the overall yield of its portfolio [4] - By the end of Q1 2025, NLY had $7.5 billion in total assets available for financing, including $4.7 billion in unencumbered Agency MBS, providing liquidity during adverse market conditions [5] - NLY has a monthly dividend yield of 14.6% with a payout ratio of 101%, reflecting confidence in its cash flow and growth prospects [6] - NLY's diversified portfolio and growth in MSR position it for improved returns as mortgage rates decline, trading at a discount compared to the industry average [10][17] Group 2: Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) - STWD's investment strategy includes commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and related commercial real estate assets, with a diversified portfolio of $1.02 billion as of March 31, 2025 [7] - The company has engaged in acquisitions and divestitures to optimize its portfolio, including the sale of 16 retail properties for $387.1 million, recognizing a gain of $92 million [8] - STWD's liquidity position is concerning, with cash and cash equivalents of $692 million against long-term debt of $18.4 billion as of March 31, 2025 [11] - STWD pays a quarterly dividend of 48 cents, yielding 9.5% with a payout ratio of 108%, but has not increased its dividend over the last five years [11] - STWD's earnings estimates suggest a year-over-year decline of 10.9% for 2025, with downward revisions indicating a more cautious outlook from analysts [20][22] Group 3: Comparative Analysis - Over the past year, shares of STWD and NLY have risen 13.7% and 11.8%, respectively, outperforming the industry's growth of 5.2% [12] - STWD is trading at a 12-month forward P/E of 10.87X, higher than its five-year median, while NLY trades at a lower P/E of 6.65X, indicating better value for NLY [14] - NLY's earnings estimates reflect a year-over-year rise of 6.3% for 2025, with upward revisions suggesting a bullish outlook, contrasting with STWD's downward revisions [20][22] - NLY is viewed as the more resilient and better-valued option for investors seeking stable income with lower risk, while STWD's higher debt levels and exposure to commercial real estate present more risks [23]

Core Viewpoint - Zacks Premium provides various tools and resources to help investors make informed decisions and enhance their confidence in stock market investments [1][2]. Summary by Category Zacks Style Scores - The Zacks Style Scores are indicators designed to assist investors in selecting stocks with the highest potential to outperform the market within a 30-day timeframe [3]. - Stocks are rated from A to F based on their value, growth, and momentum characteristics, with A being the highest score [3]. Value Score - The Value Style Score identifies attractive and discounted stocks using ratios such as P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, and Price/Cash Flow [4]. Growth Score - The Growth Style Score focuses on a company's financial health and future outlook, analyzing projected and historical earnings, sales, and cash flow to find stocks with sustainable growth [5]. Momentum Score - The Momentum Style Score helps investors capitalize on price trends by evaluating factors like one-week price changes and monthly earnings estimate changes [6]. VGM Score - The VGM Score combines the three Style Scores to identify stocks with the best value, growth potential, and momentum, serving as a strong indicator alongside the Zacks Rank [7]. Zacks Rank - The Zacks Rank is a proprietary stock-rating model that leverages earnings estimate revisions to guide investors in building successful portfolios [8]. - Stocks rated 1 (Strong Buy) have historically produced an average annual return of +25.41% since 1988, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 [9]. Stock Selection Strategy - Investors are encouraged to select stocks with a Zacks Rank of 1 or 2 that also possess Style Scores of A or B to maximize potential upside [10]. - The direction of earnings estimate revisions is crucial; stocks with lower ranks but high Style Scores may still face downward price pressure [11]. Company Spotlight: American Electric Power (AEP) - American Electric Power is a major public utility holding company serving approximately 5.6 million customers across 11 states, with a generating capacity of about 23,200 megawatts [12]. - The company has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) and a VGM Score of B, indicating a stable position in the market [12]. - AEP is projected to experience year-over-year earnings growth of 4.3% for the current fiscal year, with a recent upward revision in earnings estimates [13].

Core Insights - Zacks Premium provides various tools for investors to enhance their stock market strategies and confidence [1] - The Zacks Style Scores are designed to help investors select stocks with the highest potential to outperform the market in the short term [2] Zacks Style Scores Overview - Stocks are rated from A to F based on value, growth, and momentum characteristics, with A being the highest score [3] - The Style Scores are categorized into four types: Value Score, Growth Score, Momentum Score, and VGM Score [3][4][5][6] Value Score - The Value Score identifies attractive stocks using ratios such as P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, and Price/Cash Flow, appealing to value investors [3] Growth Score - The Growth Score focuses on a company's financial health and future outlook, analyzing projected and historical earnings, sales, and cash flow [4] Momentum Score - The Momentum Score helps investors capitalize on price trends by evaluating recent price changes and earnings estimate revisions [5] VGM Score - The VGM Score combines the three Style Scores to identify stocks with the best value, growth potential, and momentum [6] Zacks Rank Integration - The Zacks Rank uses earnings estimate revisions to simplify portfolio building, with 1 (Strong Buy) stocks historically yielding an average annual return of +25.41% since 1988 [7][8] - Investors are encouraged to select stocks with a Zacks Rank of 1 or 2 and Style Scores of A or B for optimal success [9] Company Spotlight: Vail Resorts - Vail Resorts, Inc. operates in three segments: Mountain, Lodging, and Real Estate, and currently holds a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) with a VGM Score of A [11] - The company has a forward P/E ratio of 19.95, making it attractive for value investors [11] - Recent upward revisions in earnings estimates have increased the Zacks Consensus Estimate for fiscal 2025 to $7.77 per share, with an average earnings surprise of 2.7% [12]

Here at Zacks, we focus on our proven ranking system, which places an emphasis on earnings estimates and estimate revisions, to find winning stocks. But we also understand that investors develop their own strategies, so we are constantly looking at the latest trends in value, growth, and momentum to find strong companies for our readers.Of these, perhaps no stock market trend is more popular than value investing, which is a strategy that has proven to be successful in all sorts of market environments. Value ...

Asia Value & Moat Stocks is a research service for value investors seeking Asia-listed stocks with a huge gap between price and intrinsic value, leaning towards deep value balance sheet bargains (i.e. buying assets at a discount e.g. net cash stocks, net-nets, low P/B stocks, sum-of-the-parts discounts) and wide moat stocks (i.e. buying earnings power at a discount in great companies like "Magic Formula" stocks, high-quality businesses, hidden champions and wide moat compounders). Sign up here to get starte ...

Group 1 - The broader real estate markets have underperformed compared to the S&P 500, with the Vanguard Real Estate Index (VNQ) closely tracking the S&P 500 before 2022 [1] - The article highlights the importance of data analytics in identifying investment opportunities within the equity markets, particularly in the context of real estate [1] - The focus is on value investing, emphasizing high-quality, long/short mid and small-cap companies as potential investment targets [1] Group 2 - The article does not provide any specific stock recommendations or investment advice, maintaining a neutral stance on the suitability of investments for individual investors [2][3] - There is a clear distinction made regarding the lack of any business relationships with the companies mentioned, ensuring an unbiased perspective [2] - The content reflects the author's personal opinions and experiences without any external compensation influencing the analysis [2]