Core Points - Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian expressed skepticism about the U.S. commitment to rebuilding and supporting Gaza, citing a lack of stability in U.S. actions in recent years [1] - He emphasized the need to observe the actual actions of the U.S. and Israel, stating that any subsequent phases of agreements will serve as a true test of U.S. sincerity [1] - Abdollahian denied direct communication with U.S. Middle East envoy Hochstein, indicating that information was exchanged only through intermediaries [1] - The U.S. has requested direct negotiations with Iran but rejected Iran's proposal to include the UK, France, Germany, and the International Atomic Energy Agency in discussions [1] - Iran firmly stated it will not accept any unreasonable preconditions, insisting that negotiations must resume on the basis of equality and respect [1]

Core Points - Iran's Foreign Minister, Amir-Abdollahian, stated that the agreement reached with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last month is no longer a basis for cooperation due to changing circumstances [1] - The military actions by the US and Israel, along with the activation of the "snapback sanctions" mechanism by European countries, have altered the situation significantly [1] - Following airstrikes in June, Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA, but an agreement was made in September to restore cooperation, which is now under reconsideration [1] Summary by Sections - **Iran-IAEA Cooperation**: The agreement made in September to restore cooperation with the IAEA is now deemed invalid by Iran's Foreign Minister due to recent geopolitical developments [1] - **Impact of Military Actions**: The military actions from the US and Israel, as well as the European countries' decision to reinstate sanctions, have led to a reevaluation of Iran's stance on cooperation with the IAEA [1] - **Previous Cooperation Status**: Iran had previously suspended its cooperation with the IAEA after airstrikes in June, but had reached an agreement in September to resume discussions on nuclear issues [1]

Core Points - Iranian President Pezeshkian stated that U.S. officials' actions regarding the nuclear issue indicate a lack of intention to resolve problems through negotiation and fair logic, instead aiming to increase pressure on the Iranian people through the activation of the "snapback sanctions" mechanism [1] - Pezeshkian emphasized the importance of unity and cooperation among Iranian factions to prioritize the well-being of citizens, while also focusing on reducing expenditures, optimizing energy management, and expanding trade with neighboring countries [1] - On September 27, the U.S., U.K., France, and Germany announced the completion of the "snapback sanctions" process, with the relevant sanctions against Iran being restored as of 8 PM Eastern Time on the same day [1] - The United Nations confirmed on September 28 that the Security Council's sanctions resolution concerning Iran had been reactivated, and the European Union announced on September 29 the reimplementation of a series of sanctions against Iran [1]

Core Points - Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei stated that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons and that negotiations with the U.S. are not beneficial for national interests [1] - Khamenei emphasized that Iran's uranium enrichment activities are beneficial for improving living standards and have applications in agriculture, industry, healthcare, and energy [1] - The enrichment purity of Iran can reach 60%, but it does not seek the 90% purity required for nuclear weapons [1] - Khamenei asserted that Iran has not yielded to pressure and will not do so in the future [1] - He criticized U.S. demands during negotiations, claiming they are unreasonable and akin to imposed orders rather than genuine negotiations [1] - Khamenei highlighted the U.S. withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear agreement and its failure to lift sanctions as significant issues [1] Negotiation Context - Since April, the U.S. and Iran have engaged in five rounds of indirect negotiations mediated by Oman, with significant disagreements on key issues like uranium enrichment [2] - The sixth round of talks scheduled for June 15 was canceled due to Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities [2] - During the conflict, Iran retaliated by striking a U.S. military base in Qatar [2] - In an effort to pressure Iran to resume negotiations, the UK, France, and Germany initiated a "snapback" mechanism at the UN Security Council citing Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement [2] - On September 19, the Security Council failed to pass a resolution aimed at continuing the lifting of sanctions on Iran [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Leader of Iran, Khamenei, stated that negotiations with the U.S. are not beneficial for Iran and would lead to irreparable losses [1] Group 1: Negotiation Stance - Khamenei emphasized that U.S. demands, such as shutting down Iran's nuclear industry and halting uranium enrichment, are not negotiations but impositions [1] - He expressed distrust towards the U.S., claiming that they lie and betray in all matters, making negotiations impossible [1] Group 2: Nuclear Program - Iran has increased the uranium enrichment level to 60% to meet national needs, reaffirming that it does not intend to develop or use nuclear weapons [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei stated that negotiating with the United States is not in Iran's interest and will ultimately lead to a "dead end" [1][4] - Khamenei emphasized that Iran will not yield to pressure regarding uranium enrichment and reiterated Iran's long-standing position that it does not need or intend to develop nuclear weapons [4] - Khamenei criticized the U.S. for preemptively announcing the outcome of negotiations, claiming that the result would be to force Iran to halt its nuclear activities, which he described as an imposition rather than a negotiation [4] Group 2 - Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian met with foreign ministers from the UK, France, and Germany in New York, indicating that Iran will continue discussions with all relevant parties [4] - The UK, France, and Germany accused Iran of violating its nuclear commitments, and Iran is making final efforts to prevent the re-imposition of UN sanctions on Tehran [4]

Core Points - The U.S. government is imposing strict restrictions on the Iranian delegation attending the 80th United Nations General Assembly, limiting their movement and access to certain locations [1][3] - Iranian officials are only allowed to travel between their hotel and the UN headquarters for necessary official activities, with additional restrictions on shopping at wholesale stores [3][5] - The U.S. aims to protect public safety and prevent Iranian officials from using the UN event to promote terrorism [3][5] Summary by Sections - **U.S. Restrictions on Iranian Delegation** - The Iranian delegation is subjected to movement limitations, only permitted to travel between their hotel and the UN headquarters [1][3] - Shopping at wholesale stores like Costco and Sam's Club requires prior approval from the U.S. government [3][5] - **Luxury Goods and Vehicle Purchases** - Iranian officials need U.S. permission to purchase luxury items valued over $1,000 and vehicles exceeding $60,000 [5] - Defined luxury items include watches, jewelry, perfumes, alcohol, and electronics [5] - **Diplomatic Engagements** - Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian is scheduled to meet with foreign ministers from the UK, France, and Germany to discuss Iran's nuclear issues [6]

Core Points - Iran's Supreme National Security Council announced the suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) due to the push by the UK, France, and Germany to restore UN sanctions against Iran [1][3] - The Iranian government views the actions of the European countries as inappropriate and detrimental to ongoing diplomatic efforts [2][3] - Iran's Foreign Ministry is tasked with continuing negotiations within the framework of the Supreme National Security Council to protect national interests [3] Summary by Sections - **Iran's Response to European Actions** - Iran's Supreme National Security Council held a meeting to discuss the regional situation and the recent actions of the UK, France, and Germany regarding Iran's nuclear issue [2] - The Council stated that despite ongoing cooperation with the IAEA, the actions of the European countries would lead to a practical suspension of cooperation [3] - **UN Sanctions Mechanism** - The UK, France, and Germany initiated a "snapback" mechanism to restore sanctions based on Iran's non-compliance with the nuclear agreement [4] - If the UN Security Council does not pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions within 30 days, the sanctions will automatically be reinstated [4] - **Diplomatic Efforts and Future Meetings** - Iran's permanent representative to the UN condemned the actions of the European countries and the US but indicated that diplomatic channels remain open [6] - Iran's Foreign Minister is scheduled to meet with the foreign ministers of the European countries in New York next week [6]

伊朗最高国家安全委员会20日宣布，由于英国、法国和德国强行推动联合国安理会恢复对伊制裁，伊朗 将暂停与国际原子能机构的合作。据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社当晚报道，在总统佩泽希齐扬主持下，伊 朗最高国家安全委员会召开会议，讨论地区局势和英法德三国近期在伊朗核问题上的举措等。会议宣 布，尽管伊朗外交部正在与国际原子能机构合作、并提出解决伊朗核问题的方案，但这些欧洲国家 的"不当行动"将导致伊朗与该机构的合作"实际上暂停"。 （文章来源：新华社） ...

Core Points - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Council discussed positive progress in Iran's cooperation with the IAEA regarding safeguards supervision [1][2] - China emphasized the need for diplomatic efforts to address the Iranian nuclear issue and condemned military actions by the US and Israel against Iran's nuclear facilities [1] - China opposes the rapid reinstatement of sanctions by the European trio (France, UK, Germany), arguing it undermines trust and diplomatic negotiations [1][2] Group 1 - China’s representative at the IAEA, Li Song, called for increased diplomatic efforts regarding the Iranian nuclear issue [1] - Li highlighted that military strikes by the US and Israel in June severely disrupted diplomatic efforts and cooperation between Iran and the IAEA [1] - China aims to play a constructive role in preventing escalation and promoting dialogue [1] Group 2 - Li stated that the resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue requires respect for Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy and strict international verification under the IAEA framework [2] - The international community should reach a new consensus on resolving the Iranian nuclear issue through political and diplomatic means [2] - The IAEA Director General, Grossi, reported an agreement with Iran's Foreign Minister on the restoration of safeguards cooperation [2]