Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit alleging tax fraud and bribery by the company's defendants during the specified class period [1][2]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint alleges that during the class period from December 15, 2021, to September 16, 2025, the defendants engaged in tax fraud and bribery to conceal this fraud. This resulted in an understatement of the legal risks facing the company, leading to materially false and misleading statements about its business and operations [1]. Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased shares of RCI Hospitality Holdings during the class period are encouraged to register for the class action. The deadline for seeking lead plaintiff status is November 20, 2025, and there is no cost or obligation to participate [2]. Firm's Mission - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud. The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions [3].

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) is facing allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its financial performance and project costs during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint claims that Fluor's costs for infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, were increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [1]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and hesitance due to economic uncertainty, were significantly impacting Fluor's business and financial results [1]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategy and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [1]. Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased FLR shares during the specified class period are encouraged to register for potential lead plaintiff appointment, with a deadline set for November 14, 2025 [2]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]. Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of DexCom, Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements and undisclosed material changes to their glucose monitoring products, the G6 and G7, which may pose health risks to users [1]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint alleges that DexCom made unauthorized design changes to the G6 and G7 glucose monitoring products, which rendered them less reliable than previous versions, posing a material health risk to users [1]. - It is claimed that the enhancements to the G7's reliability, accuracy, and functionality were overstated, and the company downplayed the severity of the issues related to the G7 devices [1]. - The allegations suggest that these actions increased the risk of regulatory scrutiny and potential legal, reputational, and financial harm to DexCom [1]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from July 26, 2024, to September 17, 2025, and shareholders are encouraged to register for participation [2]. - The deadline for shareholders to seek lead plaintiff status is December 26, 2025, with no cost or obligation to participate in the case [2]. Firm's Mission - The Gross Law Firm aims to protect the rights of investors affected by deceit and illegal business practices, ensuring companies adhere to responsible business practices [3].

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential violations of federal securities laws by F5, Inc. and its officers regarding misrepresentation or failure to disclose material information to investors [1][2] Group 1: Company Disclosure - On October 15, 2025, F5 disclosed that a nation-state threat actor gained unauthorized access to its internal systems on August 9, 2025, maintaining persistent access to the BIG-IP product development environment [2] - The threat actor exfiltrated files, including portions of BIG-IP source code and information about undisclosed vulnerabilities, leading to a decline in F5's share price following the disclosure [2] Group 2: Legal Investigation - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is conducting an investigation for investors who purchased F5 securities and suffered losses, inviting them to join the investigation [3] - The firm specializes in representing individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits [4] Group 3: Firm Achievements - In 2024, Johnson Fistel was ranked in the Top 10 Plaintiff Law Firms by ISS Securities Class Action Services, recovering approximately $90.725 million for investors in cases where it served as lead or co-lead counsel [5]

Core Viewpoint - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, alleging that the company and its executives made false statements regarding its business and financial prospects, leading to inflated stock prices prior to a merger [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled "City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation" and was filed in the Northern District of Ohio [1]. - Investors who purchased Six Flags stock in connection with the merger have until January 5, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit claims that the registration statement for the merger failed to disclose significant underinvestment in Legacy Six Flags, which required millions in additional capital to maintain operations [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On the merger closing date, July 1, 2024, Six Flags stock was trading above $55 per share, but subsequently fell to as low as $20 per share, representing a nearly 64% decline [4]. - The lawsuit alleges that the company's executives misrepresented the financial health of Legacy Six Flags, which undermined the rationale for the merger [3][4]. Group 3: Company Background - Six Flags is identified as an amusement park operator, and the lawsuit highlights the operational challenges faced by the company, including a reduction in employee headcount that negatively impacted operational competence and guest experience [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc for securities fraud, following a significant drop in stock price attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, representing investors in James Hardie common stock [4]. - Investors have until December 23, 2025, to request to lead the case in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois [4]. Group 2: Company Background - James Hardie is a producer and marketer of high-performance fiber cement building solutions, primarily used in external siding for the residential building industry in the U.S. and Canada [5]. Group 3: Allegations of Misrepresentation - During the relevant period, James Hardie claimed strong performance in its North American fiber cement segment, asserting "inherent strength" and "underlying momentum" in its strategy [6]. - The lawsuit alleges that the reported sales were due to inventory loading by channel partners rather than genuine customer demand, indicating potential fraudulent practices [6]. Group 4: Stock Performance Impact - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie disclosed a 12% decline in North American fiber cement sales, attributed to destocking efforts by customers [7]. - Following this announcement, the stock price plummeted by $9.79 per share, a decrease of over 34%, from $28.43 to $18.64 [7].

Core Viewpoint - The James Hardie Industries plc is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly misleading investors about the strength of its North America Fiber Cement segment, which experienced significant inventory destocking and a subsequent decline in sales [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled "Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc" and is filed in the Northern District of Illinois [1]. - Investors who purchased James Hardie common stock between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025, have until December 23, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that James Hardie and its executives violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making false statements regarding the company's performance [1][3]. Group 2: Allegations Against James Hardie - The lawsuit claims that despite early signs of inventory destocking in April and May 2025, James Hardie continued to assure investors of strong demand, misleading them about the actual market conditions [3]. - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in sales for its North America Fiber Cement segment, which led to a stock price drop of over 34% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased James Hardie common stock during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status, representing the interests of the class [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - The James Hardie Industries plc is facing a class action lawsuit alleging securities fraud due to misleading statements about its North America Fiber Cement segment, which experienced significant inventory destocking and a subsequent decline in sales [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled "Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc" and is filed in the Northern District of Illinois [1]. - Investors who purchased James Hardie common stock between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025, have until December 23, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1][5]. - The lawsuit alleges that James Hardie and its executives violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making false assurances about the strength of their business segment during a challenging market [3]. Group 2: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that despite early signs of inventory destocking in April and May 2025, James Hardie continued to mislead investors about the health of its sales [3]. - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in sales for its North America Fiber Cement segment, which led to a stock price drop of over 34% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased James Hardie common stock during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status, representing the interests of the class [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm handling the case, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc for securities fraud following a significant stock drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [2][4]. Company Overview - James Hardie Industries plc is a producer and marketer of high-performance fiber cement building solutions, primarily used in external siding for the residential building industry in the U.S. and Canada [5]. Allegations and Financial Performance - The lawsuit claims that during the relevant period, James Hardie misrepresented the strength and momentum of its North American fiber cement segment, suggesting that sales were driven by sustainable customer demand rather than inventory loading by channel partners [6]. - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in North American fiber cement sales, revealing that customers were destocking inventory, which was first identified in April and May [7]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the disclosure of the sales decline, James Hardie's stock price fell by $9.79 per share, a decrease of over 34%, from $28.43 on August 19, 2025, to $18.64 on August 20, 2025 [7].

Core Viewpoint - The James Hardie Industries plc is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company misled investors about the strength of its North America Fiber Cement segment during a period of inventory destocking [1][4]. Company Overview - James Hardie designs and manufactures a variety of fiber cement building products, operating manufacturing plants in both the United States and Australia [3]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that despite early signs of inventory destocking by customers in April and May 2025, James Hardie executives made false assurances to investors about the segment's strength and denied any inventory destocking was occurring [4]. - It is alleged that the company engaged in fraudulent channel stuffing, misleading investors about sustainable customer demand [4]. - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in sales for the North America Fiber Cement segment due to the previously undisclosed customer destocking, leading to a stock price drop of over 34% [5]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased James Hardie common stock during the specified class period (May 20, 2025, to August 18, 2025) have until December 23, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [1][6]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [6]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7].