Workflow
Large Cap Value
icon
Search documents
Should iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) Be on Your Investing Radar?
ZACKS· 2025-07-21 11:21
Launched on 05/22/2000, the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a passively managed exchange traded fund designed to provide a broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market. The fund is sponsored by Blackrock. It has amassed assets over $62.49 billion, making it one of the largest ETFs attempting to match the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market. Why Large Cap Value Large cap companies usually have a market capitalization above $10 billion. Overall, they are usually a ...
Should Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) Be on Your Investing Radar?
ZACKS· 2025-07-21 11:21
Companies that fall in the large cap category tend to have a market capitalization above $10 billion. Considered a more stable option, large cap companies boast more predictable cash flows and are less volatile than their mid and small cap counterparts. Value stocks have lower than average price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios. They also have lower than average sales and earnings growth rates. While value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in nearly all markets when you consider long-term performan ...
Should Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) Be on Your Investing Radar?
ZACKS· 2025-07-17 11:21
Core Viewpoint - The Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on stable, lower-risk investments [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Overview - The Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF was launched on December 19, 2005, and has accumulated over $7.83 billion in assets, making it one of the larger ETFs in its category [1]. - The ETF targets companies with a market capitalization above $10 billion, which are generally considered stable with more reliable cash flows compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Value stocks, which the ETF primarily invests in, typically have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, as well as lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. - Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may underperform during strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.33% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.76%, which is competitive within its peer group [4]. - As of July 17, 2025, the ETF has returned approximately 6.18% year-to-date and 8.97% over the past year, with a trading range between $35.77 and $43.05 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 21.80% of the portfolio, followed by Information Technology and Healthcare [5]. - Microsoft Corp (MSFT) represents about 2.39% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 19.42% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk Profile - The ETF has a beta of 0.91 and a standard deviation of 15.22% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. - With around 1,092 holdings, the ETF effectively diversifies company-specific risk [8]. Group 6: Alternatives - The Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Large Cap Value segment [9]. - Alternative ETFs in this space include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have larger asset bases and lower expense ratios [10]. Group 7: Conclusion - Passively managed ETFs like the Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency [11].
Should Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) Be on Your Investing Radar?
ZACKS· 2025-07-16 11:20
Core Insights - The Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is a passively managed ETF launched on September 12, 2016, with assets exceeding $976.98 million, targeting the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market [1] Group 1: Large Cap Value Overview - Large cap companies are defined as those with a market capitalization above $10 billion, offering more stability and predictable cash flows compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks are characterized by lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but they also exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates. Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance, although growth stocks tend to perform better in strong bull markets [3] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for FVAL are 0.16%, making it one of the cheaper ETFs in its category, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.55% [4] - FVAL aims to match the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, which includes large and mid-cap U.S. companies with attractive valuations. As of July 16, 2025, FVAL has gained approximately 5.16% year-to-date and 10.10% over the past year, trading between $52.80 and $65 in the last 52 weeks [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising about 31.50% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Microsoft Corp (MSFT) represents approximately 7.22% of total assets, with Nvidia Corp (NVDA) and Apple Inc (AAPL) also among the top holdings. The top 10 holdings account for about 38.51% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - FVAL has a beta of 0.96 and a standard deviation of 16.59% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification of company-specific risk with around 130 holdings [8] - Alternatives to FVAL include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger asset bases of $70.24 billion and $138.31 billion, respectively, with lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04% [11]
Should First Trust Value Line Dividend ETF (FVD) Be on Your Investing Radar?
ZACKS· 2025-07-14 11:21
Core Viewpoint - The First Trust Value Line Dividend ETF (FVD) offers broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on dividend-paying companies [1][7]. Group 1: Fund Overview - FVD is a passively managed ETF launched on August 19, 2003, and is sponsored by First Trust Advisors, with assets exceeding $9.08 billion [1]. - The ETF targets large cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations above $10 billion, which are generally considered stable investments [2]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - FVD aims to match the performance of the Value Line Dividend Index, which includes U.S. securities that pay above-average dividends and have potential for capital appreciation [7]. - The ETF has recorded a year-to-date increase of approximately 4.71% and a one-year increase of about 11.62% as of July 14, 2025 [7]. - Over the past 52 weeks, FVD has traded between $40.62 and $46.70 [7]. Group 3: Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for FVD are 0.61%, making it one of the more expensive ETFs in its category, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.26% [4]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 21.70% of the portfolio, followed by Utilities and Consumer Staples [5]. - Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) represents about 0.49% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 4.8% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk Profile - FVD has a beta of 0.72 and a standard deviation of 13.07% over the trailing three-year period, categorizing it as a medium-risk investment [8]. - The ETF consists of about 226 holdings, which helps to diversify company-specific risk [8]. Group 6: Alternatives - Alternatives to FVD include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger assets under management and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10].