Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DeFi Technologies Inc. due to alleged securities fraud affecting investors between May 12, 2025, and November 14, 2025 [1][2]. Summary by Sections Class Definition - The lawsuit aims to recover losses for investors adversely affected by alleged securities fraud during the specified period [2]. Case Details - On November 13, 2025, DeFi Technologies announced its third-quarter financial results, revealing a nearly 20% decline in revenue, significantly below market expectations. The company also revised its 2025 revenue forecast from $218.6 million to approximately $116.6 million, citing delays in executing DeFi Alpha arbitrage opportunities due to increased competition and consolidation in digital asset price movements [3]. - Following this announcement, DeFi's share price dropped by $0.40, or 27.59%, closing at $1.05 per share on November 17, 2025 [3]. Legal Information - The case is identified as Linkedto Partners LLC v. DeFi Technologies Inc., et al., No. 25-cv-06637. Investors have until January 30, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this status [4]. About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC - Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC is a prominent boutique securities litigation law firm, recognized among the top 10 firms nationally based on total settlement value. The firm represents a diverse range of clients, including institutional and retail investors, in seeking recoveries for investment losses due to corporate fraud [4].

NEW YORK, Dec. 19, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Coupang, Inc. (NYSE: CPNG) between August 6, 2025 and December 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 17, 2026 in the securities class action first filed by the Firm. So what: If y ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its financial health and growth prospects during a specified class period from June 4, 2025, to October 29, 2025 [1][2]. Allegations Against Defendants - The lawsuit claims that Sprouts' reports of growth and stability were overly optimistic and did not reflect the reality of its financial situation [2]. - It is alleged that Sprouts' consumer base was not as resilient to macroeconomic pressures as claimed, leading to reduced spending [2]. - The anticipated benefits from macroeconomic pressures did not materialize, resulting in Sprouts failing to meet its growth projections [2]. - Consequently, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false and misleading [2]. Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors in Sprouts have until January 26, 2026, to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff representative for the class [3]. - A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all class members and typically has the largest financial interest in the case [3]. - The decision to serve as a lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery from the lawsuit [3]. Law Firm Background - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is a prominent U.S. law firm specializing in securities-fraud class actions and investor protection [4]. - The firm has a history of leading significant recoveries in securities litigation and has received numerous accolades for its work [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. on behalf of investors who purchased shares during the specified Class Period, alleging that the merger with Cedar Fair L.P. was misrepresented regarding the company's operational and capital needs [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that the registration statement for the merger did not accurately reflect Six Flags' true operational and capital requirements, despite public assertions of significant investments [3]. - Investors who acquired Six Flags securities during the Class Period have until January 5, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. Group 2: Stock Performance - Following the merger's closure on July 1, 2024, Six Flags' stock price initially traded above $55 per share but subsequently plummeted to as low as $20, marking a decline of nearly 64% [4]. Group 3: Company Background - Six Flags, headquartered in Arlington, Texas, operates one of the largest networks of theme and water parks in North America [2].

Core Viewpoint - Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP has initiated an investigation into Above Food Ingredients Inc. regarding potential violations of federal securities laws affecting investors [1] Company Summary - Above Food Ingredients Inc. is listed on NASDAQ under the ticker ABVE [1] - The investigation is aimed at assessing the company's compliance with federal securities regulations [1] Investor Implications - Investors who have incurred losses on Above Food Ingredients Inc. are encouraged to inquire about pursuing claims to recover their losses [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. due to significant stock price decline following disappointing financial results and guidance revisions, indicating potential misrepresentation of the company's performance and outlook [1][2][3]. Group 1: Financial Performance - On October 29, 2025, Sprouts reported third-quarter results with comparable-store sales growth of 5.9%, which was below the company's prior guidance [2]. - The company revised its full-year comparable store growth expectations to flat to 2%, attributing this to "challenging year-on-year comparisons" and signs of a softening consumer [2]. - Following the announcement, Sprouts' stock price dropped by $27.3, or 26.1%, closing at $77.25 per share on October 30, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that during the class period, Sprouts made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations [3]. - Specific claims include that Sprouts' customer base was not as resilient as claimed, and the company was not adequately positioned to handle economic changes [3]. - The lawsuit also contends that the reported sales growth figures did not reflect a sustainable trajectory, as the company faced a significant slowdown in sales growth due to cautious consumer behavior [3].

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential derivative claims on behalf of Five Below, Inc. regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and violations of state and federal law by certain officers and directors [1] Shareholder Actions - Current shareholders of Five Below, Inc. who held shares continuously before July 16, 2024, may seek corporate governance reforms, return of funds to the Company, and a court-approved incentive award at no cost [2] Background of the Investigation - On July 16, 2024, Five Below, Inc. reported a 5.0% year-over-year decline in comparable sales and reduced fiscal second-quarter 2024 sales expectations, projecting revenue between $820 million and $826 million with an anticipated 6%–7% decrease in comparable sales [2] - The announcement also included the sudden departure of the Company's President and CEO [2] Legal Proceedings - Following the disclosures, Five Below and certain executives were named as defendants in a federal securities class action lawsuit for failing to disclose material adverse information to investors [3] - The court overseeing the case denied the Company's motion to dismiss in part, allowing significant portions of the case to proceed [3] Investigation Focus - Johnson Fistel's investigation is centered on whether Five Below's board of directors and senior management failed to oversee operations and disclosures properly, permitted misleading statements regarding financial performance and sales trends, and exposed the Company to legal, financial, and reputational harm [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Perrigo Company plc, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between February 27, 2023, and November 4, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Perrigo's infant formula business, acquired from Nestlé, suffered from significant underinvestment in maintenance and operational improvements [2] - It is alleged that Perrigo needed to make substantial capital and operational expenditures beyond previously stated cost estimates to remediate issues in the infant formula business [2] - The complaint states that there were significant manufacturing deficiencies in the facility for the infant formula business [2] - As a result of these issues, Perrigo's financial results, including earnings and cash flow, were overstated [2] - The positive statements made by the defendants regarding the Company's business and prospects were materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [2] Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the relevant time frame have until January 16, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff [3] - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has extensive expertise in complex securities litigation [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Blue Owl Capital Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The complaint alleges that Blue Owl Capital Inc. faced significant pressure on its asset base due to redemptions from business development companies, leading to undisclosed liquidity issues [2]. - It is claimed that the company was likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain business development companies, which contradicts the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects [2]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until February 2, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, with no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Legal Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securing significant recoveries for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop due to potential violations of federal securities laws [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, captioned Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc, et al., No. 1:25-cv-13018 [3]. - Investors have until December 23, 2025, to request to be appointed to lead the case [3]. Group 2: Company Background - James Hardie is a producer and marketer of high-performance fiber cement building solutions, primarily used in external siding for the residential building industry in the U.S. and Canada [4]. Group 3: Allegations of Fraud - During the relevant period, James Hardie claimed that its North American fiber cement segment showed "inherent strength" and "underlying momentum," while in reality, sales were driven by inventory loading rather than sustainable customer demand [5]. - The company reported a 12% decline in North American fiber cement sales during the quarter, attributed to destocking efforts by customers [6]. Group 4: Stock Performance - Following the revelation of declining sales, James Hardie's stock price fell by $9.79 per share, or over 34%, from $28.43 on August 19, 2025, to $18.64 on August 20, 2025 [6].