智通财经7月3日电，据央视新闻报道，当地时间7月2日，四名共和党众议员在大规模税收与支出法案的 程序性投票中投出反对票，至少在目前阻止了该法案进入最后通过阶段。据悉，众议院议长约翰逊需要 至少说服四名共和党反对者中的一名才能通过这一程序性步骤。这四人目前都投了反对票，但他们仍然 可以改变主意。当地时间7月2日，美国国会众议院为推进美国总统特朗普的大规模税收与支出法案，也 就是所谓"大而美"法案进行多轮程序性投票，这是该法案能否进入正式辩论与表决程序前的关键门槛。 如果程序性投票全部通过，众议院将就该法案进入正式辩论与表决程序。 美四名共和党众议员对"大而美"法案投出反对票 ...

美国众议院议长约翰逊：只要有必要，关于"大而美法案"的讨论将继续进行。 ...

当地时间7月2日，美国国会众议院为推进美国总统特朗普的大规模税收与支出法案，也就是所谓"大而 美"法案进行多轮程序性投票，这是该法案能否进入正式辩论与表决程序前的关键门槛。如果程序性投 票全部通过，众议院将就该法案进入正式辩论与表决程序。目前上述程序性投票尚未有结果。7月1日， 美国国会参议院以微弱多数通过了美国总统特朗普力推的所谓"大而美"法案，并提交至众议院。由于较 众议院此前通过的版本有较大修改，因此该法案需要得到众议院的再次通过才能提交给美国总统签字并 成为法律。(央视新闻) ...

参议院惊险过关共和党内部矛盾显现 当地时间1日上午，美国参议院历经22小时通宵"马拉松"投票，最终以副总统万斯投下决定性一票，以 51票对50票的结果，惊险通过美国总统特朗普力推的"大而美"法案。 肯塔基州参议员兰德·保罗、北卡罗来纳州参议员汤姆·蒂利斯和缅因州参议员苏珊·柯林斯三位共和党人 投下反对票，而此前持保留态度的阿拉斯加州参议员丽莎·穆尔科夫斯基最终选择支持法案。 英国《金融时报》在报道中指出，投票结果显示出共和党内部存在明显分歧。 报告特别指出，法案中关于乡村医院关停的条款可能导致部分地区的医疗服务可及性下降。 法案的争议性还体现在其立法程序上。民主党人提出的多项修正案，包括删除乡村医院关停条款、恢复 食品援助等内容，均被共和党以党派票数否决，这种强硬立场进一步激化了两党对立。 引发美政坛激烈争斗马斯克反对增添变数 另一方面，民主党方面则保持高度团结，该党47名参议员一致反对该法案。 法案通过后，特朗普立即在"真相社交"平台发声，敦促众议院共和党人"无视作秀者"，争取在7月4日独 立日假期前完成表决。他写道："按计划推进——在你们和家人享受7月4日假期前完成它！" 白宫方面对法案前景表示乐观，发言 ...

Core Points - The "One Big Beautiful Bills" tax and spending proposal by President Trump has passed the Senate by a narrow margin, moving closer to becoming law [1][3] - Supporters claim the bill will positively impact the U.S. economy by stimulating demand and increasing employment, while critics argue it will harm low-income Americans by cutting funding for poverty programs to offset tax cuts [1][4] Legislative Details - The Senate passed the bill with a vote of 51 in favor and 50 against, with Vice President Kamala Harris casting the tie-breaking vote [3] - The bill aims to reduce taxes by $4 trillion and cut spending by at least $1.5 trillion over the next decade [4][5] - It includes various tax relief measures, such as exemptions for overtime pay and tips, while increasing the exemption thresholds for estate and gift taxes [3][4] Impact on Social Programs - The bill plans to cut nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid and tighten eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), raising the age limit for food assistance from 54 to 64 years [4][5] - Experts indicate that the distribution of benefits from the bill is highly uneven, with the lowest-income Americans expected to see a decrease in after-tax income by approximately 2.3% over the next decade [5][6] Economic Implications - The bill is projected to increase the national debt by $3.3 trillion over the next ten years, with conflicting assessments from both parties regarding its fiscal impact [7][8] - Critics, including Senator Chuck Schumer, argue that the bill disproportionately benefits the wealthy while harming the poor, labeling it as a "Robin Hood in reverse" [5][6] Political Context - The passage of the bill highlights the deep partisan divide in U.S. politics, with all Democratic senators opposing it and divisions within the Republican party regarding the extent of spending cuts [6][9] - The bill's future is uncertain as it must return to the House for another vote due to significant amendments made in the Senate [4][6]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the U.S. is poised for significant economic growth this year, contingent upon the passage of the "Big and Beautiful" bill, which is expected to be one of the most successful pieces of legislation in history [1] Economic Growth - The article claims that unprecedented levels of investment, amounting to trillions of dollars, are currently being funneled into the U.S. economy, surpassing any previous records [1] - It also mentions that hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs are contributing to the U.S. Treasury, indicating a robust fiscal environment [1] Political Context - The narrative suggests a contrast between the current administration's economic performance and the previous administration, portraying the current situation as a rapid recovery from the challenges left by the Democratic Party [1] - The article calls for Republican unity against what it describes as radical leftist influences, urging them to leverage their political advantages [1] National Sentiment - The article reflects a sentiment shift, stating that the U.S. has transformed from a "dead" country with no hope to "the hottest country in the world" within a year [1]

中国人民大学经济学院教授 王晋斌：从法案本身内容来讲，可以看出"大而美"法案首先是一个不顾财 政赤字的法案，不管是5万亿还是4万亿，债务上限提高都会增加美国的债务。这个法案也是一个不顾民 生的法案，大量的民生支出被削减，尤其是医疗保险，贫富差距会进一步扩大。此外，这个法案不鼓励 技术进步，也不鼓励绿色发展，削减了新能源补贴，增加了传统化石能源补贴。法案还增加了军费支 出，希望能够继续维持美国的军事霸权。所以"大而美"法案的通过，将对美国未来10年的经济发展有很 大影响。 当地时间7月1日，美国国会参议院以51票赞成、50票反对的表决结果通过了美国总统特朗普力推的所 谓"大而美"法案，并提交众议院。这背后反映了美国当前怎样的政治现状？接下来，"大而美"法案如果 被特朗普签署成为一项法律，会对美国产生什么影响？ 中国人民大学经济学院教授 王晋斌：法案凭借万斯的一票惊险通过，实际上反映出民主党和共和党之 间对"大而美"法案存在非常大的意见分歧，使得该法案不具备普惠性，最终结果可能会使其仅体现出某 一个党派的价值取向。原本共和党拥有票数优势，但后来共和党内部有人投了不赞成票，这个法案在共 和党内部本身就未达成一致，所 ...

Group 1: Legislative Progress - The "Big and Beautiful Act" narrowly passed in the Senate with a vote of 51:50 and will be sent to the House for a final vote[1] - The Senate version of the bill differs significantly from the House version submitted in May, necessitating a return to the House for a new vote[1] - House Speaker Mike Johnson aims to pass the bill before July 4[1] Group 2: Budgetary Differences - The Senate's revised budget plan is projected to increase the deficit by $3.4 trillion, compared to the House's $2.4 trillion increase[2] - Including interest costs, the Senate's total potential debt impact is $3.94 trillion, while the House's is $2.97 trillion[2] - The Senate version proposes a $5 trillion increase in the debt ceiling, while the House version suggests a $4 trillion increase[2] Group 3: Key Issues and Risks - Major points of contention between the two chambers include Medicaid cuts, SNAP reductions, and the SALT deduction cap[2] - Internal divisions within the Republican Party may affect the speed and success of the bill's passage[4] - The potential for the House to reject the revised Senate version remains, depending on the extent of disagreements[3]

相关链接 财料 一图看懂风口浪尖上的《大而美法案》 ...

特朗普7月1日在社交媒体上发帖称，美方代表当天与以色列方面就加沙地带局势进行长时间会谈，以方 同意与巴勒斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动（哈马斯）达成60天停火协议的必要条件，卡塔尔和埃及将提交协议的 最终文本。特朗普还称，他希望哈马斯能够接受这项协议。 【环球网报道】美国总统特朗普与企业家埃隆·马斯克近期围绕"大而美"税收与支出法案的"口水战"激 化。在此背景下，马斯克7月2日在社交平台X上发帖，"称赞"特朗普在解决地区冲突中发挥的作用。 在马斯克帖子评论区，有网友表示迷惑，"老兄，你一会儿批评他，一会儿又称赞他？"还有网友 称，"又成朋友了？"另有网友称，"不懂特朗普与马斯克之间'爱恨交织的关系'"。 在马斯克批评特朗普政府所力推大规模税收与支出的"大而美"法案之际，特朗普7月1日在社交媒体上发 帖称，"埃隆获得的补贴可能远多于历史上任何一个人。如果没有补贴，埃隆可能不得不关门，回到南 非老家。不再有火箭发射、卫星或电动汽车生产，我们的国家将节省一大笔钱。或许我们应该让政府效 率部好好调查一下？这能节省一大笔钱！"马斯克随后称，"我说把它（补贴）都砍掉吧。就现在"。 美国国会参议院7月1日通过了"大而美"法案，马斯克此 ...