This is the “retaliatory regulatory regime” strategy I’ve been advocating as a poison pill measure against any foreign government who fines a US company for hosting free speech online. Fantastic stuff by @prestonjbyrne putting forth a concrete proposal to codify this into law https://t.co/qprMSbFLNwPreston Byrne (@prestonjbyrne):Congress: this is the way"If enacted, it would mean that if Ofcom tried to fine Meta 10 per cent of its $164 billion revenue, as the Online Safety Act allows, Meta could countersue ...

RT auspill (@aus_pill)Our Turning Point chapter decided to ban students from their chat due to their support for Tucker Carlson (who literally spoke at a Turning Point event just weeks ago). They cited “hate speech” as the reason, a nonsensical leftist term used to stifle free debate.My university scored poorly on free speech, I thought it was left-wing students and faculty that shut down debate, but it looks like elements of the right are equally responsible for campus censorship.Hopefully pressure from th ...

RT Joseph D. McBride, Esq. (@McBrideLawNYC)In 2023, the public was still being lied to about @Cobratate and @TateTheTalisman.I reached out to @TuckerCarlson and told him the truth. The charges were fake. The case was fiction. We were preparing to sue their false accuser for defamation. Then I asked him, “Do you want to interview Andrew and Tristan?”A few weeks later, we were in Romania filming. When the interview aired, people lost their minds. There was outrage and noise from those who can’t stand anything ...

Political Commentary - The tweet references a statement by DailyWire alum Brett Cooper suggesting Randy Fine should move to Israel due to his perceived prioritization of Israel over Free Speech [1] - The tweet expresses a sentiment of change and dissatisfaction with the status quo, using the phrase "We are never going back to the way things used to be" [1] - The tweet promotes an "America First" ideology [1]

Political Positioning within the GOP - The report highlights a perceived internal conflict within the Republican Party [1] - It frames the conflict as a choice between "America First" and "Israel First" ideologies [1] - It also contrasts "Christ the King" with a "Judeo-Christian" approach [1] - The report presents a dichotomy between free speech and cancel culture [1]

Joining me now is Jason Stanley, professor of philosophy at the University of Toronto. His work focuses on authoritarianism, on propaganda, on free speech, and on democracy. He's the author of multiple books, including Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future. Jason, thank you for being with us. I You have been very clear on this. You're calling it a coup. You're believe you believe we're watching it happen and unfold in in real time. This is not a conversation about the future t ...

(0:00) Disgraziad Corner: The most disgraceful things of the week! (3:10) Elon on X's new algorithm, why there has been so much Sydney Sweeney content lately (11:35) Creating Grokipedia: Wikipedia's failures, the future of information on the internet, confirmation bias (24:52) Three years of X: Looking back on the Twitter acquisition and how it changed free speech on the internet (42:49) Tesla vote on Elon's compensation, would he leave Tesla if it doesn't pass? (47:40) OpenAI lawsuit, for-profit conversion ...

Once a beacon for democracy and free speech, the US now struggles to live up to its own ideals. From Nepal to Indonesia, a new generation is looking elsewhere for inspiration. https://t.co/WblVV7rEPS ...

Surveillance and Censorship Infrastructure - The report suggests that government agencies, intelligence contractors, and Big Tech have collaboratively built a surveillance, propaganda, and censorship machine reshaping the internet [1] - Child protection measures are allegedly being weaponized against free speech and online privacy [1] - The CIA is implied to have influence within the tech industry [1] - Surveillance is allegedly being turned on Americans [1] - The report mentions Larry Ellison's surveillance "utopia" [1] - Oracle is mentioned as being tied to "shady stuff" [1] Data Privacy and Government Influence - The report emphasizes the importance of protecting personal data, even with so much already online [1] - Elite stakeholders are suggested to shape government [1] - The public needs to be aware of what is happening [1] Specific Topics Discussed - Texas app store age verification law is discussed [1] - How the CIA gathers mass biometric data is explored [1] - The concept of a "limited hangout" is defined [1] - The report claims the CIA doesn't just target villains [1] - The report questions whether technology dehumanizes us [1] - The presumption of innocence is allegedly gone [1]

Once a beacon for democracy and free speech, the US now struggles to live up to its own ideals. From Nepal to Indonesia, a new generation is looking elsewhere for inspiration https://t.co/bBsL75d3HU ...