Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) is a passively managed fund that provides broad exposure to the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $2.73 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1]. Group 1: Fund Overview - SPGP was launched on June 17, 2011, and is sponsored by Invesco [1]. - The ETF aims to match the performance of the S&P 500 Growth at a Reasonable Price Index, which includes securities with strong growth characteristics selected from the Russell Top 200 Index [7]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion, are stable, and exhibit predictable cash flows, resulting in lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Growth stocks, while having higher sales and earnings growth rates, also come with higher valuations and volatility, often outperforming value stocks in bull markets but lagging in long-term returns [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.36% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.41% [4]. - As of August 13, 2025, SPGP has gained approximately 5.37% year-to-date and 12.24% over the past year, with a trading range between $86.05 and $112.52 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 21.5% of the portfolio, followed by Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology [5]. - Super Micro Computer Inc (SMCI) represents about 2.88% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 23.82% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk and Diversification - SPGP has a beta of 1.00 and a standard deviation of 18.95% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification of company-specific risk with around 77 holdings [8]. Group 6: Alternatives - Other ETFs in the same space include the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ), with VUG having $186.22 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04%, while QQQ has $366.77 billion in assets and charges 0.2% [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is a significant player in the Mid Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with over $4.16 billion in assets, providing investors with a diversified investment option in this sector [1][10]. Group 1: Mid Cap Growth Characteristics - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, typically exhibit higher growth prospects compared to large cap companies while being less volatile than small cap companies, offering a balance of stability and growth potential [2]. - Growth stocks generally have higher sales and earnings growth rates, expected to outpace the wider market, but they also come with higher valuations and volatility, performing well in strong bull markets but struggling in other market conditions [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - The Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.39% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.67%, which is competitive within its peer group [4]. - The ETF aims to match the performance of the S&P MIDCAP 400 MOMENTUM INDEX, achieving a return of approximately 5.34% year-to-date and 15.38% over the past year, with a trading range between $101.93 and $136.30 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 27.6% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Consumer Staples [5]. - The top holding, Interactive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR), represents about 5.18% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 29.67% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - The ETF has a beta of 1.03 and a standard deviation of 20.44% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification of company-specific risk with around 79 holdings [8]. - Alternatives in the Mid Cap Growth ETF space include the Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) with $17.34 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.07%, and the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) with $19.77 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23% [11]. Group 5: Market Trends - There is a growing trend among retail and institutional investors towards passively managed ETFs due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].

Core Viewpoint - The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a leading investment option for exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the U.S. equity market, with significant assets and low expense ratios, making it attractive for long-term investors [1][4][10]. Group 1: ETF Overview - SCHD is a passively managed ETF launched on October 20, 2011, and is sponsored by Charles Schwab, with assets exceeding $69.99 billion [1]. - The ETF aims to match the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which focuses on high dividend yielding stocks with a strong record of dividend payments [7]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are generally more stable and exhibit predictable cash flows compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which typically have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, have historically outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance, although growth stocks may excel in strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - SCHD has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.06%, positioning it among the least expensive ETFs in its category, and it offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 3.81% [4]. - As of August 11, 2025, SCHD has gained approximately 0.25% year-to-date and 4.36% over the past year, with a trading range between $24.32 and $29.53 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Consumer Staples sector, comprising about 19.8% of the portfolio, followed by Energy and Healthcare [5]. - Texas Instruments Inc (TXN) is the largest holding at approximately 4.33% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 40.3% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - SCHD holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong expected returns based on various factors, making it a compelling choice for investors interested in the Large Cap Value segment [10]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), with VYM having $62.20 billion in assets and VTV at $139.70 billion, both with competitive expense ratios [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) provides broad exposure to the Small Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with a focus on companies that typically have higher growth potential but also higher risk [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Overview - VTWG is a passively managed ETF launched on September 22, 2010, and is sponsored by Vanguard [1]. - The fund has accumulated over $1.01 billion in assets, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.1%, making it one of the least expensive options available [4]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, are generally considered to have higher growth potential compared to larger companies, albeit with increased risk [2]. - Growth stocks, which VTWG primarily invests in, are characterized by faster growth rates, higher valuations, and above-average sales and earnings growth [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising about 22% of the portfolio, followed by Healthcare and Industrials [5]. - Individual holdings include Slbbh1142 at approximately 1.19% of total assets, with Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Fabrinet (FN) also among the top holdings [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - VTWG aims to match the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index, which includes companies with higher price/book ratios and growth rates [7]. - As of August 8, 2025, the ETF has gained about 1.32% year-to-date and approximately 14.35% over the past year, with a trading range between $163.60 and $229.76 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 1.15 and a standard deviation of 23.07% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a higher risk profile [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - VTWG holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Small Cap Growth segment [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) with $11.67 billion in assets and the Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) with $19.21 billion, each with different expense ratios [10]. Group 6: Market Trends - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Viewpoint - The WisdomTree U.S. MidCap ETF (EZM) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the U.S. equity market, with assets exceeding $772 million, making it a mid-sized ETF in this category [1] Group 1: ETF Overview - Launched on February 23, 2007, EZM is a passively managed ETF sponsored by WisdomTree [1] - The ETF targets mid cap companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, which are perceived to have higher growth prospects compared to large cap companies while being less risky than small cap firms [2] Group 2: Financial Metrics - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.38%, which is competitive within its peer group [4] - It offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.33% [4] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Energy sector, with the top three sectors being Energy, Industrials, and Materials [5] - The top 10 holdings account for approximately 107.03% of total assets under management, indicating a concentrated investment strategy [6] Group 4: Performance Analysis - EZM aims to match the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Index, having gained about 0.7% year-to-date and 10.18% over the past year as of August 7, 2025 [7] - The ETF has traded between $51.81 and $68.19 in the past 52 weeks [7] - It has a beta of 1.07 and a standard deviation of 20.67% over the trailing three-year period, categorizing it as a medium risk investment [8] Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - EZM holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating a moderate outlook based on expected returns, expense ratios, and momentum [9] - Other comparable ETFs include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) with $13.43 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) with $18.16 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [10] Group 6: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like EZM are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is a significant player in the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with over $13.43 billion in assets, and aims to provide broad exposure to this sector [1]. Group 1: ETF Overview - IWS was launched on July 17, 2001, and is passively managed by Blackrock [1]. - The ETF targets mid-cap companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, balancing stability and growth potential [2]. Group 2: Value Stocks Characteristics - Value stocks, which IWS focuses on, typically have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. - Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance, although growth stocks may excel in strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for IWS are 0.23%, which is competitive within its peer group, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.57% [4]. - IWS aims to match the performance of the Russell MidCap Value Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 4.18% and a one-year return of about 11.37% as of August 7, 2025 [7]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 17.7% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Real Estate [5]. - Coinbase Global Inc Class A (COIN) represents about 0.72% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 6.08% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk and Alternatives - IWS has a beta of 1.00 and a standard deviation of 17.35% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. - Alternatives to IWS include the First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (SDVY) and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE), with respective assets of $8.36 billion and $18.16 billion [10].

Core Viewpoint - The iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is a passively managed fund that aims to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $727.04 million, making it an average-sized ETF in this category [1] Group 1: Fund Overview - Launched on June 28, 2004, IMCV is sponsored by Blackrock and focuses on mid-cap companies with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, which are seen as having higher growth prospects compared to large-cap companies while being less risky than small-cap firms [1][2] - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.06%, making it one of the least expensive options in its category, and it offers a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.5% [4] Group 2: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 19.8% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Utilities [5] - Capital One Financial Corp (COF) is the largest individual holding at approximately 2.41% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 12.21% of total assets under management [6] Group 3: Performance Metrics - IMCV aims to match the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 5.32% and a one-year return of about 12.7% as of August 6, 2025 [7] - The ETF has a beta of 0.95 and a standard deviation of 16.7% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification with around 286 holdings [8] Group 4: Alternatives and Market Position - IMCV carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a reasonable option for investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment [10] - Other alternatives in the market include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) with $13.44 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) with $18.18 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.07% [11]

Core Viewpoint - The ALPS (OUSA) ETF offers broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $804.12 million since its launch in July 2015 [1] Group 1: Large Cap Value Characteristics - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion, characterized by stability and predictable cash flows, resulting in lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance [3] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.48% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.33%, aligning with peer products [4] - OUSA aims to match the performance of the FTSE US Qual / Vol / Yield Factor 5% Capped Index, having gained approximately 2.46% year-to-date and 12.04% over the past year as of August 6, 2025 [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest allocation is to the Financials sector at about 26.6%, followed by Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Microsoft Corp. constitutes approximately 5.74% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 43.56% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - OUSA has a beta of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 13.53% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 101 holdings [8] - Alternatives include Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger asset bases and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10] Group 5: Bottom Line - Passively managed ETFs like OUSA are favored by both institutional and retail investors for their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is a large-cap value ETF that aims to provide broad exposure to the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on dividend-paying stocks [1][11]. Group 1: ETF Overview - Launched on November 8, 2005, SDY has over $20.17 billion in assets, making it one of the largest ETFs in its category [1]. - The ETF is passively managed and sponsored by State Street Investment Management [1]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large-cap companies typically have market capitalizations above $10 billion, offering more stability and reliable cash flows compared to mid and small-cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which SDY focuses on, generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but they also exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - SDY has an expense ratio of 0.35% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.58% [4]. - The ETF has gained approximately 5.64% year-to-date and 5.23% over the past year, with a trading range between $121.58 and $144.00 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is to Industrials at about 21%, followed by Consumer Staples and Utilities [5]. - Microchip Technology Inc accounts for approximately 2.49% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 17.82% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk and Alternatives - SDY seeks to match the performance of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, which includes companies that have consistently increased dividends for at least 20 years [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 0.78 and a standard deviation of 14.28% over the trailing three years, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. - Alternatives to SDY include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares Global Industrial (GIC) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) to determine which stock represents a better undervalued investment opportunity for investors in the Industrial Services sector [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - GIC currently holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while GWW has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive earnings estimate revisions, suggesting that GIC is likely experiencing a more favorable earnings outlook compared to GWW [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - GIC has a forward P/E ratio of 16.94, significantly lower than GWW's forward P/E of 23.04, indicating that GIC may be undervalued relative to GWW [5]. - The PEG ratio for GIC is 1.06, while GWW's PEG ratio is 2.44, further suggesting that GIC is a more attractive value option when considering expected earnings growth [5]. - GIC's P/B ratio stands at 4.18, compared to GWW's P/B of 10.97, reinforcing the notion that GIC is undervalued based on its market value relative to book value [6]. - These valuation metrics contribute to GIC's Value grade of B, while GWW has a Value grade of C, indicating a stronger value proposition for GIC [6]. Group 3: Conclusion on Investment Opportunity - Given the improving earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics, GIC is positioned as the superior value option in the current market [7].