Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that low price and low cost are fundamentally different competitive dimensions, where low price is a marketing tactic that undermines profits, while low cost is rooted in supply chain optimization, technological innovation, and management upgrades [1][2]. Group 1: Market Competition Dynamics - Recent trends show that disorderly competition in certain industries has weakened development capabilities and led to low-quality products, negatively impacting both companies and consumers [1]. - Price competition is a significant aspect of market competition, but disorderly price competition indicates market failure, which cannot be resolved quickly through spontaneous market adjustments [1][2]. - The recent announcement by the National Development and Reform Commission and the State Administration for Market Regulation highlights the urgency of addressing price disorder in the market [1]. Group 2: Policy Responses - A series of policy measures have been introduced to address price disorder, reminding the market that low prices are often a temporary illusion, while true competitive strength lies in solid low-cost capabilities [2]. - The revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law aims to provide stronger legal protection for fair competition and consumer rights in the digital economy era [1][2]. Group 3: Long-term Strategies - To effectively govern price disorder, it is crucial to balance market resource allocation with government intervention, ensuring that businesses can set prices autonomously while adhering to existing laws [3]. - Key industries facing severe price competition should conduct assessments of average industry costs to provide a scientific reflection of operational conditions and competitive dynamics [3]. - Establishing a monitoring mechanism for abnormal price fluctuations and implementing credit penalties for companies engaging in unfair low-price competition are essential steps to maintain a fair market environment [3].