Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a case of intellectual property theft where a newly established company used the works of two AIGC artists without their consent, presenting them as their own client cases, highlighting the challenges faced by creators in protecting their rights [1][2][20]. Group 1 - The company in question was established in August and has been accused of using the works of artists Hai Xin and Awen without authorization [2][3]. - Hai Xin and Awen are recognized AIGC artists whose works have gained significant popularity, including appearances on major platforms [2][5]. - The company created a presentation (PPT) that included a substantial amount of work from these artists, with their contributions occupying nearly half of the total pages [6][10]. Group 2 - The timeline of events indicates that Hai Xin discovered her name associated with a project from the company on September 8, leading to confusion as she had not collaborated with them [15][16]. - Following the discovery, both artists engaged in discussions with lawyers and the company to clarify their position and seek resolution [16][20]. - The company acknowledged the issue, attributing it to a misunderstanding and promising to rectify the situation by apologizing and removing the unauthorized content [20][22]. Group 3 - The article emphasizes the emotional toll on artists who must divert their focus from creation to legal battles, highlighting the disparity in effort between original creation and unauthorized use [30][38]. - It critiques the ease with which works can be stolen compared to the difficulty of pursuing justice, noting that the process often yields no value for the original creators [39][40]. - The author expresses frustration over the industry's culture of allowing such practices to persist, calling for greater awareness and protection for creators [49][51].