Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the innovative mechanisms and digital empowerment initiatives taken by the Lianjiang County Procuratorate in Fujian Province to enhance criminal prosecution and supervision, establishing a new collaborative framework with law enforcement agencies [1][2] Group 2 - The Lianjiang County Procuratorate has implemented an "early intervention + consultation" mechanism to strengthen the collaboration between prosecutorial supervision and internal police oversight, resulting in the review of 87 cases this year, including two significant drug trafficking cases leading to the seizure of 1.77 tons of drugs and the prosecution of 13 suspects [1] - The integration of digital tools has significantly improved the precision of supervision, utilizing self-developed big data legal supervision models to identify clues for monitoring investigative activities, thereby promoting standardized law enforcement practices [1] Group 3 - The office for collaborative supervision has played a crucial role in expanding the effectiveness of oversight, working with police to implement measures to clear and prevent "hanging cases," employing big data models to investigate and verify these cases systematically [2]

Group 1 - The Harbin Songbei District People's Procuratorate has optimized its supervisory functions and extended the supervisory chain, actively exploring a "cross-departmental linkage + substantive stationed" work model, achieving phased results [1] - The focus is on improving the "entry gate" of cases by establishing and improving institutional mechanisms, addressing issues such as supervision lag and poor collaboration [1] - The core measure is the substantive stationing of prosecutors, with a joint mechanism established with the district police bureau to enhance criminal case supervision and collaboration [1] Group 2 - Prosecutors are assigned to specific police precincts to strengthen cooperation, using various methods such as on-site lectures and discussions to facilitate timely communication on key case aspects [2] - Regular reporting is implemented to promptly correct issues, with a focus on common problems in evidence collection and legal application in high-frequency crime categories [2] - The aim is to foster a closer supervisory collaboration between prosecutors and police, ensuring alignment in law enforcement concepts and evidence acceptance standards [2] Group 3 - A special task for clearing backlog cases has been initiated, reviewing 505 cases from 2021 to 2024, identifying 40 backlog cases, and prompting the police to handle 19 cases effectively [3] - A long-term prevention mechanism for backlog cases has been established to dynamically track ongoing cases and prevent the accumulation of new backlogs [3] - This initiative aims to optimize judicial resource allocation and ensure the legal rights of involved parties are protected while allowing police to focus on new cases [3]