Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the alleged misconduct of former executives at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Angli Co., Ltd. (交大昂立), who are accused of misappropriating company funds through improper insurance transactions, resulting in significant financial losses for the company [2][10]. Group 1: Allegations of Misconduct - Five former executives, including the former chairman and president, are accused of using company funds to purchase insurance policies for themselves and subsequently cashing out the premiums into personal accounts, totaling approximately 16.94 million yuan (about 2.4 million USD) [2][5][9]. - The company has filed a criminal complaint against these executives for "damaging company interests" and has reported the case to the local police, although initial investigations did not lead to formal charges [2][4]. Group 2: Discovery of Irregularities - The irregularities were discovered during a self-audit initiated after a tax authority inquiry in November 2022, which revealed that the company had made significant insurance payments without proper documentation [4][5]. - The company found that in 2018 alone, it had made insurance payments totaling 12.84 million yuan (about 1.8 million USD) without corresponding insurance contracts, raising red flags about the legitimacy of these transactions [4][8]. Group 3: Lack of Compliance and Documentation - The company highlighted the absence of necessary approvals and documentation for the insurance transactions, including a lack of records from the compensation and assessment committee, board resolutions, and public disclosures [2][9]. - The former executives claimed that the insurance purchases and subsequent refunds were part of their compensation, but this assertion lacks legal backing as such remuneration requires board and shareholder approval [5][9]. Group 4: Legal and Regulatory Implications - Legal experts suggest that the actions of the former executives could constitute a breach of fiduciary duty, potentially leading to personal liability for the losses incurred by the company [11][12]. - The article also discusses the regulatory framework surrounding group insurance policies, indicating that refunds should typically be returned to the company rather than individual accounts unless specific legal procedures are followed [14][15].