Core Points - The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has exclusive rights to the names "Chinese Academy of Sciences" and "CAS," as well as trademark rights and copyright for its logo [2] - CAS does not engage in the production or operation of specific products, including medical supplies, drugs, or health products, and unauthorized use of its name or logo constitutes a violation of its legal rights [2][3] - CAS has identified 29 instances of infringement where individuals or organizations have misused its name and logo for false advertising, misleading consumers and violating CAS's rights [3] Infringement Cases - Case 1: "Petroleum Soap" claimed to be developed by CAS in newspaper advertisements [4] - Case 2: "North Cordyceps Artificial Cultivation" used CAS's name in online promotions, claiming "CAS ten years of technical breakthroughs" [5] - Case 3: "Henan CAS Treatment for Vitiligo" misused CAS's name in online promotions [6] - Case 4: "All-Net Address" falsely claimed collaboration with CAS in an online project [6] - Case 5: "Banglian High-Efficiency Silver" used CAS's name and logo in print advertisements for false promotion [7] - Case 6: "Synchronizer" misappropriated CAS's name and fabricated speeches for product advertising [8] - Case 7: "Zhongke Tea Gold" falsely claimed to be based on CAS research reports in TV and online promotions [9] - Case 8: "Internship Activities" falsely advertised collaboration with CAS for internship programs [9] - Case 9: "Shenzhen Special Stone Organic Agriculture Co., Ltd." claimed to have established comprehensive cooperation with CAS [9] - Case 10: "Taiyuan Special Stone Ecological Circular Agriculture Co., Ltd." made similar claims of cooperation with CAS [9] - Case 11: "Shenzhen Qianhai Precision Biotechnology Co., Ltd." used CAS's name in unauthorized genetic testing reports [9] - Case 12: "Shanghai Yixue Education Technology Co., Ltd." misused CAS's name in promotional materials [10] - Case 13: "Qitian Sunshine Education Consulting (Beijing) Co., Ltd." used CAS's name in unauthorized advertising [10] - Case 14: "Shanghai Jiasi Environmental Technology Co., Ltd." engaged in false promotion using CAS's name and logo [11] - Case 15: Various educational institutions and agricultural companies misused CAS's name for false advertising [11][12][13] - Case 16: "Liaoning Shengyuan Fertilizer Technology Co., Ltd." used CAS's name for misleading promotions [13] - Case 17: "Zhongke Health Industry Group Co., Ltd." improperly used CAS's brand in product promotions [14]