Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issues surrounding the improper public disclosure of administrative penalties and the impact on corporate credit, emphasizing the need for timely credit restoration for affected enterprises [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Administrative Penalties and Corporate Credit - The Supreme People's Procuratorate reported that from January last year to June this year, 1,366 cases related to social credit supervision were handled, including 557 cases of improper credit punishment by administrative agencies and 260 cases of breach of trust [1]. - Some administrative agencies have been found to improperly publicize minor penalties, such as a 300 yuan fine, for up to three years, which hinders timely credit restoration for enterprises [2]. - A total of 1,700 million individuals have been pressured to either repay debts or reach settlements due to credit punishment and consumption restrictions [3]. Group 2: Issues in Credit Restoration - The article identifies two main problems in credit restoration: the non-standard collection of breach of trust information by administrative agencies and the untimely notification of credit restoration [2]. - There are instances where companies are wrongfully included in the list of dishonest executors, leading to restrictions on their operations and credit access [3][4]. - The article discusses a case where a company was wrongfully penalized and subsequently placed on the dishonesty list, but after investigation and intervention by the procuratorate, the penalty was revoked, allowing the company to restore its credit [3]. Group 3: Legal Environment and Corporate Rights - The article emphasizes the importance of a lawful business environment, noting that companies should operate legally and protect their credit [4]. - It mentions that companies have the right to apply for credit restoration if they are wrongfully listed as dishonest, and relevant departments should fulfill their obligation to notify about credit restoration [4].