军事接管

Search documents
以军要求加沙北部医疗机构为加沙城居民南撤作准备
Xin Hua She· 2025-08-21 15:30
据以色列媒体21日报道,以军已向加沙地带北部的医疗机构和国际援助组织发出"初步警告",要求他们 为从加沙城撤离平民至加沙地带南部作好准备。 《以色列时报》当天援引以军提供的通话记录报道,一名以色列军官在与一名加沙地带卫生官员通话时 说:"我正与你讨论以军进入加沙城的可能性。将会有一场从加沙城至加沙南部的全面撤离。" 通话记录显示,以军要求医疗机构制订一个从加沙地带北部向南部转移医疗设备的计划,以便向南部地 带伤病者提供护理,并作好接收北部伤病者的准备。 《以色列时报》21日报道说,以总理内塔尼亚胡在澳大利亚一家电视台当天播放的节目中说,即使巴勒 斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动(哈马斯)同意停火和释放被扣押人员,以色列也会执行军事接管整个加沙地带的 计划。 以色列国防军发言人埃菲·戴弗林20日说,以军目前已控制位于加沙地带北部的加沙城外围,为接管加 沙城作军事准备。 以色列安全内阁8日批准内塔尼亚胡关于"击败哈马斯"的计划,以军准备接管加沙城。此举在以色列国 内外引发反对和谴责。 (文章来源:新华社) ...
“危险举动”“完全错误的方向”……以色列“接管加沙城”决定被多方谴责
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-08-08 22:32
Core Points - Israel's security cabinet approved Prime Minister Netanyahu's proposal to defeat Hamas, with plans for the Israeli Defense Forces to take control of Gaza City [1][4] - The decision has drawn significant criticism globally, with concerns raised by the EU, China, and other nations regarding potential humanitarian crises and increased isolation for Israel [1][6] - The Israeli military leadership expressed strong opposition to the plan, citing risks to hostages and potential humanitarian disasters [3][4] Summary by Sections Decision and Approval - The Israeli security cabinet meeting lasted 10 hours, concluding with a statement early on the 8th, indicating a majority approval for the military action [3] - The plan aims to transfer all Palestinian civilians from Gaza City to central refugee camps while surrounding Hamas militants and launching ground offensives [4][5] Military Strategy - The operation is seen as a potential first phase of a broader military action to occupy Gaza, with expectations of a multi-stage plan lasting approximately five months [4][5] - The terminology used by the Israeli government, opting for "takeover" instead of "occupation," is intended to mitigate legal responsibilities [5] International Reactions - Protests erupted in Israel against the government's decision, with families of hostages expressing their concerns [6] - Global leaders, including those from the EU and UK, have urged Israel to reconsider its military escalation, labeling it as a potential war crime [6][7]