Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the complexities of property division in rural divorce cases, where emotional ties often outweigh financial considerations, and practical solutions are necessary for resolution [4]. Group 1: Case Background - The case involves a divorce property division dispute over 53 poultry, including 29 chickens, 22 geese, and 2 ducks, rather than traditional assets like real estate or savings [2]. - The couple, both rural residents, primarily relied on farming and livestock for income, with no significant assets other than a self-built house [2]. Group 2: Mediation Process - The judge proposed a specific distribution plan for the poultry, suggesting that the geese be divided by size and the ducks split evenly, while addressing the challenge of the odd number of chickens [3]. - The resolution involved cooking the extra chicken together, symbolizing a cooperative approach to their separation [3]. Group 3: Emotional and Social Dynamics - The case reflects a trend in rural divorce cases where property is simple but emotional ties are complex, necessitating a solution that both parties can accept [4]. - Despite the legal proceedings, the couple maintained a basic level of friendship, with the male party offering transportation to the female party after mediation [4].