司法不公
Search documents
美司法部再公开超300万页爱泼斯坦案相关材料
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-31 00:57
已披露材料包括1996年提交给联邦调查局的一份投诉记录、有关潜在同伙调查的细节,以及2019年爱泼斯坦被捕后,联邦调查局在其纽 约及美属维尔京群岛房产中搜查获得的数千张照片。司法部称,后续文件披露将继续在法律允许范围内推进。 爱泼斯坦与大批美国政商名流交往密切,因涉嫌性犯罪被捕后,2019年8月死于狱中,被判定为"自杀"。特朗普2024年竞选总统期间承 诺,上台后将公布爱泼斯坦案相关文件。 2025年11月18日,美国国会以压倒性多数通过一项法案,要求司法部在当年12月19日前公开爱泼斯坦案相关文件。美国总统特朗普11月 19日签署这一法案。司法部自12月19日起开始公布相关文件,但文件一经公布就引发多重争议。多方指责司法部"选择性公布"文件,暴 露出美司法不公、权势干预司法等问题。(央视记者 曹健) △美国司法部(资料图) 转自:央视新闻 当地时间1月30日,美国司法部继续公布已故富商杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案相关调查材料。司法部副部长托德·布兰奇在记者会上表示,司法部 当天额外公布超过300万页相关材料,其中包括约2000段视频和18万张图片,均与爱泼斯坦案件有关。 布兰奇表示,此次披露系根据《爱泼斯坦档案透明法 ...
美司法部:发现超100万份爱泼斯坦案文件 或需数周才能公布
Xin Hua She· 2025-12-25 01:00
Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Justice has discovered over 1 million documents potentially related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's case, which will take weeks to review before publication [1] - The documents were found by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI, and have been handed over to the Department of Justice for examination [1] - The Department of Justice has previously released nearly 30,000 pages of Epstein-related documents, some of which contained allegations against former President Trump, which the DOJ later claimed were false [3] Group 2 - The DOJ has faced criticism for selectively releasing documents, with accusations of obscuring key information under the guise of protecting privacy [4] - The initial batch of released documents prominently featured former President Clinton, leading to allegations that the DOJ is attempting to shift blame [4] - Analysts suggest that the DOJ's actions are merely a formal response to congressional and public demands, with significant information still concealed [4]
美司法部:发现上百万份爱泼斯坦案文件 或需数周才能公布
Xin Hua She· 2025-12-24 22:33
Core Points - The U.S. Department of Justice has discovered over 1 million documents potentially related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's case, requiring several weeks for review before publication [1][2] - The documents were found by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI, and have been transferred to the Department of Justice for examination [1] - The Department of Justice is working diligently to review the documents and will make necessary redactions to protect victims as per legal requirements [1] Legislative Context - On November 18, Congress passed a bill overwhelmingly requiring the Department of Justice to release documents related to the Epstein case by December 19 [2] - President Trump signed the bill into law on November 19, prompting the Department of Justice to begin releasing documents from December 19 [2] - The release of these documents has sparked controversy, with accusations of selective disclosure and concerns over judicial fairness and potential interference by powerful entities [2]
美司法部:发现上百万份爱泼斯坦案文件 或需数周才能公布
Xin Hua She· 2025-12-24 22:18
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Justice has discovered over 1 million documents potentially related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's case, requiring several weeks for review before public release [1]. Group 1: Document Discovery and Review - The documents were found by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI, and have been transferred to the Department of Justice [1]. - The Department of Justice is conducting a thorough review of the documents, working around the clock to redact necessary information to protect victims [1]. - Due to the large volume of documents, the review process may take several weeks before any public disclosure can occur [1]. Group 2: Legislative and Public Response - On November 18, the U.S. Congress passed a bill with overwhelming support, mandating the Department of Justice to release documents related to the Epstein case by December 19 [1]. - President Trump signed the bill into law on November 19, initiating the timeline for document release [1]. - Following the release of the documents on December 19, there has been significant controversy, with accusations of selective disclosure by the Department of Justice, raising concerns about judicial fairness and potential interference [1].
爱泼斯坦案文件背后的龌龊
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-24 17:46
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Justice's release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, which includes allegations against former President Trump, has sparked significant controversy and raised questions about the integrity of the judicial process in the U.S. [2][5] Group 1: Reasons for Document Release - The release of Epstein-related documents was mandated by Congress through the "Epstein Archives Transparency Act," which required the DOJ to publish these files by December 19 [3]. - The DOJ faced political pressure from the upcoming elections, as Trump's supporters expressed dissatisfaction with the administration's inconsistent stance on releasing these documents [3]. - The timing of the document release, just before the Christmas holiday, was seen as a strategy to minimize public scrutiny and media attention [3]. Group 2: Controversies Surrounding the Release - The DOJ's selective release of documents has been criticized for lacking transparency, with significant portions of the files redacted, including at least 550 pages that were initially completely blacked out [5]. - Critics, including Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, pointed out that the released documents did not include internal reports and emails as required by the congressional mandate, raising concerns about compliance [5]. - The focus on former President Bill Clinton in the released documents has led to accusations that the DOJ is attempting to deflect attention from issues related to Trump, further politicizing the judicial process [5]. Group 3: Potential Impact on Political Landscape - Analysts suggest that the DOJ's handling of the Epstein documents could increase discontent among Trump's MAGA supporters, potentially affecting voter turnout in the upcoming midterm elections [6]. - Republican strategist Brian Darling warned that decreased enthusiasm among Trump's base could pose risks for Republican candidates in swing districts during the 2026 midterm elections [6].