转自：法治日报 □ 本报记者 黄辉 □ 本报通讯员 龚享福 "扫一扫二维码，司法服务马上到！"在位于江西省赣州市赣县区 的赣州高新技术产业开发区，企业负责人只需用手机轻扫"虔法助企"平台二维码，司法服务便可一键直 达。 近年来，赣县区人民法院以"虔法助企"工作站为载体，整合巡回审判、多元解纷、法治宣讲等职 能，汇聚司法助企"一汪清水暖流"，为当地优化法治化营商环境注入源源不断的司法动能。 "从扫码提 交诉求到达成和解，只用了三天！"提及与某科技公司的服务合同纠纷，某技术公司负责人李生连声赞 叹道。 2025年8月，两家企业因技术服务费用支付问题产生争议，原告企业通过"虔法助企"平台提交诉 求后，工作站迅速组织特邀调解员介入，联动商会、工商联开展调解。最终双方达成庭外和解，原告主 动撤诉，纠纷在诉前高效化解。 "企业特别是中小企业，常有'咨询无门'的困扰。"赣县区法院副院长赖 虔国告诉《法治日报》记者，"虔法助企"工作站统筹制定惠企工作措施，集中受理企业法律诉求，推动 涉企矛盾源头预防、前端化解。 此外，为打通司法服务"最后一公里"，该院一方面选派58名干警挂点 结对176家重点企业，就地化解矛盾纠纷；另一方面 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Dalaiteqi People's Court is focused on optimizing the legal business environment, enhancing judicial support for enterprises, and improving the efficiency of handling enterprise-related cases in 2023 [1][2] Group 1: Case Handling Efficiency - In the first half of the year, the court handled 2,575 enterprise-related cases, with 2,181 cases concluded, resulting in a closure rate of 84.7% and an average processing time of 35.12 days [1] - The establishment of a "green channel" for enterprise-related cases in litigation service halls and grassroots courts provides timely services such as litigation guidance, risk alerts, and legal clarifications [1] Group 2: Simplified Procedures - The court applies simplified procedures for enterprise-related cases with clear legal relationships and minor disputes, expediting the resolution process [2] - Cases eligible for small claims procedures are prioritized and directed to rapid adjudication teams to shorten the litigation cycle [2] Group 3: Specialized Handling and Mediation - Complex enterprise-related cases are assigned to specialized courts, which maintain a case ledger and prioritize scheduling for these cases [2] - The court enhances communication with business associations and regulatory bodies to improve mediation mechanisms and reduce the costs of dispute resolution for enterprises [2] Group 4: Execution Practices - The court adheres to a principle of civil execution that emphasizes goodwill and civility, implementing guidelines to prevent excessive asset seizures during civil litigation [2] - When multiple assets are available for seizure, the court considers efficiency and minimal cost, opting for "live seizures" where possible to maximize asset utility [2]