掀起了不小波澜 最高检在新闻发布会上的一句话 最近 "婚前同居认定属于家庭成员" 不少人疑惑 这难道意味着同居就要"被结婚"？ 分手也要"分家产"？ 最高检为什么要提出这样的认定？ 11月25日，最高检在主题为"依法惩治家庭暴力犯罪"发布会上明确提出： 将具有共同生活事 实的婚前同居关系，认定为家庭成员关系。 最高检党组成员、副检察长、全国妇联副主席葛晓燕介绍，随着社会交往方式的多样化，检察 机关依据刑法、反家庭暴力法等法律规定精神， 将具有共同生活基础事实的婚前同居关系认 定属于家庭成员关系，并将家庭成员身体伤害以外的精神虐待认定为家庭暴力行为，对受害者 的保护更加立体全面。 长期以来，同居关系中的暴力行为处于法律保护的"灰色地带"。比如轰动一时的"包丽案"，正 是因为缺乏"家庭成员"的身份认定，施暴者一度难以被追究刑事责任。 如今，这一认定填补了法律空白， 让精神虐待、情感操控等隐形暴力，也能被认定为家暴， 让施暴者不再逍遥法外。 同居要承担婚姻中的全部权利义务吗？ 这一认定仅限于反家暴领域，并不等同于承认"事实婚姻"。 在财产分割、法定继承、离婚补偿等问题上，法律依然严格区分"婚姻"与"同居"。比如，同 ...

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has recognized premarital cohabitation with common living facts as a family member relationship, aiming to enhance the legal protection against domestic violence [2] - This recognition addresses the legal gray area surrounding violence in cohabiting relationships, allowing for the classification of psychological abuse and emotional manipulation as domestic violence [2] - The recognition is specifically limited to the realm of domestic violence and does not equate to the acknowledgment of "de facto marriage," maintaining a clear distinction in legal matters such as property division and inheritance [3] Group 2 - The recognition aims to provide a more comprehensive protection for victims of domestic violence, filling a legal gap that previously left many cases unaddressed [2] - The legal framework will still differentiate between marriage and cohabitation in terms of rights and obligations, ensuring that property acquired during cohabitation is divided based on agreements or contribution ratios [3]