Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the increasing unemployment rate in the U.S. and the emergence of "functional unemployment," where individuals are employed but unable to afford basic living costs [1][2][5] - The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development reported over 770,000 homeless individuals, but this figure does not account for those living in cars or with friends, suggesting the actual number may be significantly higher [2][5] - A sociologist's research indicates that the true number of homeless individuals could be around 4 million, many of whom are employed but earn insufficient wages to secure stable housing [5][6] Group 2 - The Ludwig Institute's report indicates that the real unemployment rate, which includes those in functional unemployment, is around 24% to 25%, significantly higher than the official rate of approximately 4.2% [7][9] - The report emphasizes that nearly a quarter of the workforce is in a state of functional unemployment, with no signs of improvement in the current trends [7][9] - A Pew Research Center survey revealed that 40% of respondents consider their financial situation "average," and 17% describe it as "poor," reflecting a broader perception of economic distress [9] Group 3 - Concerns have been raised about the accuracy of government statistics, as the response rate to surveys has declined, leading to calls for alternative data sources to better capture economic realities [10][12] - The Ludwig Institute's methodology for calculating the real unemployment rate includes those who work but struggle financially, contrasting with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' broader definition of employment [12][14] - The articles question whether full-time employment can be considered adequate if it does not provide enough income for housing, nutrition, education, and healthcare [12]