Group 1 - The article highlights the tragic case of a doctor who committed suicide due to online harassment, raising concerns about the impact of cyberbullying on individuals' lives [1] - It discusses the evolution of online violence, noting that it now includes not only direct insults but also moral coercion and the invasion of privacy [2][3] - The article emphasizes the broad reach of online violence, where victims can be ordinary individuals rather than just public figures, and the reasons for harassment have shifted from factual errors to personal disagreements [2] Group 2 - The phenomenon of group attacks in online violence is noted, where initial harassment by a few can escalate into a collective frenzy, fueled by shared sentiments among users [2] - The article points out that perpetrators often exploit the anonymity of the internet, making it difficult to hold them accountable for their actions [4][7] - It mentions the increasing prevalence of organized online harassment, where individuals or groups may manipulate public sentiment for personal gain, creating a "customized online violence" industry [4][9] Group 3 - The article discusses the challenges in addressing online violence, including the difficulty in gaining attention for clarifications after the initial outrage and the anonymity of perpetrators [7][8] - It highlights the psychological impact of online violence, which can be as severe as physical violence, yet often results in inadequate legal consequences for offenders [8] - The need for improved regulations and accountability from online platforms is emphasized, suggesting that they should take more proactive measures to prevent and address online violence [9]