Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the comprehensive assessment reform in Jiangxi since 2022, which aims to accurately evaluate the performance of officials through three key assessments focusing on party leadership, development effectiveness, and public evaluation, thereby promoting high-quality development [2] Group 1: Comprehensive Assessment Reform - Jiangxi has implemented a comprehensive assessment reform that includes "three assessment papers" to evaluate party leadership, development effectiveness, and public evaluation, ensuring precise indicators and detailed scheduling [2] - The assessment results are used to promote capable officials and demote ineffective ones, with continuous improvements in assessment orientation, methods, and result application over three years [2] Group 2: Addressing Performance Issues - To prevent deviations in officials' performance perspectives, Jiangxi has established a list of eight major issues related to performance deviations, which are included in the assessment criteria [2] - In 2024, a significant fire incident in Xinyu led to a "one-vote veto" in the annual comprehensive assessment, resulting in a drop in assessment ranking from second to third [2] Group 3: Cadre Adjustments and Recognition - In 2024, approximately 60% of the newly promoted provincial leaders in Jiangxi had an annual assessment rating of excellent, while 24 officials were adjusted for being unsuitable for their current positions [2][3] - Since the implementation of the "Regulations on the Ability of Leading Cadres to Rise and Fall" in 2022, Jiangxi has adjusted 55 unsuitable provincial-level officials and 12 county-level leaders, demonstrating a proactive approach to performance management [3] Group 4: Practical Evaluation and Feedback - Jiangxi integrates comprehensive assessments with cadre evaluations, promoting 2,226 capable officials in 2024 and rewarding 239 excellent provincial officials [4] - The annual comprehensive assessment summary meeting provides feedback to evaluated units, enhancing clarity on strengths and weaknesses, and motivating further efforts [4] - The assessment has strengthened the commitment of officials to their responsibilities and fostered a more robust atmosphere for practical work and high-quality development [4]